Gun control nfw

[NovaFlex]

Nice find brutus!

The charter bulldog .44 special looks pretty good for concealed carry. Can be had for less than $400 which makes it a value and a big bore at that!

I may have to give wheel guns a second look.

Imo, if you're looking for a revolver, especially for self defense, you can't get better than The Judge. For anyone unfamiliar, it shoots .45 long colts AND 410 shells. It's a fucking monster. Dont personally own it, but my uncle does. I've shot it enough times to be familiar with it. By far the best close quarters defense pistol.

5 rnd cylinder. You load that thing every other, LC / 410 and nothing within 15 / 20 feet will be standing.

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

I'm slow to carry a semi- seen too many jam.

Pick up one of these milsurp babies. They go bang every time.

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

Anyone remember when Hollywood's leading actors were REAL men? Pajama boys like George Clooney weren't always the norm.

 

[brutus79]

Pick up one of these milsurp babies. They go bang every time.

1911's are so frigging big... I love them so... Kimberly has some nice compact 1911's but my hands are too big- my Palm slides up the beavertail and I get bit by the fucking slide half way through the clip. Catches me on the knuckle of my index finger.

 

[brutus79]

Imo, if you're looking for a revolver, especially for self defense, you can't get better than The Judge. For anyone unfamiliar, it shoots .45 long colts AND 410 shells. It's a fucking monster. Dont personally own it, but my uncle does. I've shot it enough times to be familiar with it. By far the best close quarters defense pistol.

5 rnd cylinder. You load that thing every other, LC / 410 and nothing within 15 / 20 feet will be standing.

They have a raging judge that pops off .454 casulls - now that's a fucking monster. Heavy guns for carry.

I own zero guns for a while now- I sold them all to pay for my custody battle fun. Dual purpose since I didn't want to be the guy with my history with guns, feel me? I look pretty bad on paper. I'm looking to pick up a carry piece (..4 special, glock 42 or glock 43), a full size piece (1911 and/or s&w m&p .40) and an 18" 12g mossberg tactical. Start the collection back up and those are some of the faves I owned previously.

 

[ironwill1951]

I don't know you but I do think you are full of shit,
men that see people die in the streets or any where else seldom speak of it , your trash talk is just that , your a pathetic wannabe, i have no respect for you..

That's interesting cause when I running the streets in my hay day we robbed everybody rich and poor.

We especially enjoyed robbing crack dealers, but that was over 20 years ago.
That's my past. What your hollering Brutus is nothing special.

It's funny to me that people make accusations about others without really knowing them.

I grew up in west Philadelphia it was about as hoody as it gets.
I have seen people shot right in front me, I have seen people fall out right in front of with heroin needles still in there arm.

I have seen more shit than most!

 

[NovaFlex]

They have a raging judge that pops off .454 casulls - now that's a fucking monster. Heavy guns for carry.

I own zero guns for a while now- I sold them all to pay for my custody battle fun. Dual purpose since I didn't want to be the guy with my history with guns, feel me? I look pretty bad on paper. I'm looking to pick up a carry piece (..4 special, glock 42 or glock 43), a full size piece (1911 and/or s&w m&p .40) and an 18" 12g mossberg tactical. Start the collection back up and those are some of the faves I owned previously.

I hear you man. 3 year probation. I own nothing on paper.

1911 is solid and proven, but it's heavy when compared to a glock. It comes down to preference though. Personally, when i lived in less restricted states, my EDC was always a G17. Picked one up real cheap when i lived down south. Loved that little thing.


I feel u on the shotty tip too. Definitely can't go wrong with a pump by the nightstand.

 

[jaymaximus]

This thread took a turn...

 

[Morefyah]

Finally thank you Jay!
These fucking faggot vampires sucked the life out of me today!

I don't know you but I do think you are full of shit,
men that see people die in the streets or any where else seldom speak of it , your trash talk is just that , your a pathetic wannabe, i have no respect for you..

I have no respect for you mom.
She didn't tip me after I fucked her brains out tonight! Cheap sluttt!!
Don't fuck with me faggot or get comfortable with me calling your mom a whore like she is!!!

 

[Morefyah]

I don't know you but I do think you are full of shit,
men that see people die in the streets or any where else seldom speak of it , your trash talk is just that , your a pathetic wannabe, i have no respect for you..

Go back to the meth farm you clueless red neck faggot!

 

[Morefyah]

They have a raging judge that pops off .454 casulls - now that's a fucking monster. Heavy guns for carry.

I own zero guns for a while now- I sold them all to pay for my custody battle fun. Dual purpose since I didn't want to be the guy with my history with guns, feel me? I look pretty bad on paper. I'm looking to pick up a carry piece (..4 special, glock 42 or glock 43), a full size piece (1911 and/or s&w m&p .40) and an 18" 12g mossberg tactical. Start the collection back up and those are some of the faves I owned previously.

Stfu faggot!!

 

[Gramps]

^^^ Typical fucking liberal... Do they all really just only hate guns or do they all simpy hate *everything*?

 

[DTdr2]

 

[Superfly]

My kind of table

 

[Superfly]

 

[Ach3r0n]

How many of my brothers are sick and tired of left wing talking monkeys trying to take the weapons away from law abiding citzens. I include the vast majority of members here as being law abiding citzens in every other way other than aas.

Mental illness is the true problem but the cocksuckers in Washington blame their own failed ideology.

I'm for back ground checks and other measures that protects the public from lunes, but to take weapons from people who need to protect their families is not the answer.

I am deeply sadend from this last mass killing, but it is because mental illness has been on the back burner since that worthless pos Reagen was in office.

The rooster has come home to roost. Big fucking surprise.

I'm tired of hearing that the 2nd Amendment is to blame for every shooting spree that occurs. If someone is determined to kill a bunch of people, they're going to do it regardless of whether they or you have a gun. That is part of the price we pay for living in a free society. That said, I am even more tired of the uneducated right wingnuts who hear "gun control" and think someone is trying to take all of their guns away. You sound like a bunch of misguided leprechauns. We DO need better gun control. When I applied for my LCF, I waited on line in the courthouse, completed some forms, paid a fee and went home. Ten days later I had a permit and no one had called either of my two references. In fact, after speaking to dozens of my friends and co-workers (everyone carries here) I learned that not one of them had their references checked. You would have to be a complete moron in order to think a system like that doesn't need improvement. Bottom line: The far left and far right both need to get their heads out of their asses on this issue and focus on the REALITY.

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

That said, I am even more tired of the uneducated right wingnuts who hear "gun control" and think someone is trying to take all of their guns away. You sound like a bunch of misguided leprechauns. We DO need better gun control.

Why? Those on the left DO want to take all the guns away. That's their ultimate goal, even if they're unwilling to admit it publicly. Occasionally - either due to pandering or emotion or some other reason, politicians slip and reveal their true agenda, just as Obama did in the immediate aftermath of the latest shooting spree when he used the gun bans in Australia and the UK as an example of what could be done in the US.

The reason the NRA and the "uneducated right wingnuts" are opposed to any gun control measure is because they know what a slippery slope it will become. If they submit to a few insignificant controls today, they'll be asked to submit to a few more, slightly more significant controls next year, and even more significant controls the year after that, and so on and so forth.

I'm not saying the system doesn't need improvement but the left isn't interested in improvement. There will never be enough gun control to satisfy the left, so they won't stop their push for more until they've eliminated all private firearm ownership. That's the goal and it's a lot easier and much less painful to achieve when it's done piecemeal rather than all at once. That's what they've been doing in Canada. The Canadians haven't banned gun ownership yet (they came close to a complete handgun ban a few years ago under a liberal government) but they do have some of the strictest gun control laws in the world. There has been some loosening under the Conservative government however, if the Conservative Party loses the upcoming election, you can expect the march for more gun control legislation to start immediately and they probably will be successful in banning handguns this time.

The bottom line is that the left has given the NRA and those pesky "uneducated right wingnuts" no other option but to oppose any and all attempts to impose gun control.

 

[NovaFlex]

Acheron, there's no middle ground when it comes to gun control.

It all boils down to the fact that keeping law abiding citizens away from firearms is not going to prevent criminals from obtaining them. More legislation will be futile in regards to preventing homicides.

 

[Gramps]

I haven't kept up - how many laws did the gunman ignore in the last incident that already limit the law abiders? And which newly proposed law which would limit us even more would have prevented this? Some of you don't get it. The insane aren't going to be troubled by a new law or restriction. AAS is illegal right? That's good to know so no one has any means of obtaining any since the law says so.

 

[flenser]

Armed civilians are a threat to government, not each other. Both the left and right will eventually take them away given the chance. The NRA practically wrote the first gun laws, banning automatic weapons in the aftermath of prohibition. This wasn't to protect civilians, but the police. Both the left and right supported the ban, even though the reason police were threatened, prohibition, had been removed.

Don't think for a second the politicians on either side wouldn't vote to further restrict firearms if events and propaganda made it seem reasonable to do so. And don't think a political lobby will protect you. Under the right circumstances the NRA will back additional 2nd amendment infringement, just as it did in 1934.