Hard to say, it's more complicated than just height/weight/lean body mass/body fat percentage. Muscle insertions, bone size and etc. play a major role.
So I'm almost identical in stats to this guy, give or take ~2% body fat difference. Yet we look different. My back, arms, hams, glutes dominate compared to other body parts. His traps and upper body in general dominate and I can't see his back to compare more. We have different muscle insertions, ie. His chest wins, yet my arms especially forearms win and so on.
To reach those stats for 5'10 person, I'd estimate about 200-210lbs 12-16% body fat (again depends on how you distribute body fat). I store on my legs and ass more, so I can get away being a bit heavier and look similar. Note that this person is right around 12% body fat, it is lighting and pump advantage that makes him look leaner to the untrained eye.
Tlder;
I'm not him, he's not me. You are neither of us. You're just you and we all have different genetics.
Totally agree with lukiss. Even the same height, weight and bodyfat can differ a lot between them.
One example can be different structure for the one to have a long torso and short legs and vice versa. Another example could be the weight and fat distribution between upper and lower body.
Personally i have no glute muscles (they just don't grow) and if i was a woman nobody would look at me lol, also my legs tend to hold a small amount of fat compared with my upper body. I see quad veins even at 25% bodyfat while my upper body is full on fat on belly, love handles, chest etc. I've seen guys in real life with same bodyfat and weight as me and their stomach was flat but their hips and thighs were enormous.
But to answer your hypothetical question i'd say probably 215.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.