HYB (Best Service and Product - International Shipping)

[readalot]

You have shitty raws

Thanks for the confirmation. They aren't mine but I'm sure someone will enjoy them.

 

[narta]

Thanks for the confirmation. They aren't mine but I'm sure someone will enjoy them.

You could figure that out by simply testing for purity.

 

[iris]

Thanks for the confirmation. They aren't mine but I'm sure someone will enjoy them.

You should have gotten from them Qsc, don't you know

 

[readalot]

You could figure that out by simply testing for purity.

No, you wouldn't know what the contaminants were. Some more dastardly than others.

 

[readalot]

You should have gotten from them Qsc, don't you know

That seems to be the correct answer to any question at this point haha.

 

[readalot]

You could figure that out by simply testing for purity.

Look at the Test C vs the Test E. Anyway, I asked Jano whether the tibolone hit is legit or should be followed up with targeted analysis for confirmation.

 

[readalot]

Which test is this one of janoship?

the one that has the word “pass” written in the little box?

Could you elaborate? Not following.

 

[iris]

You could figure that out by simply testing for purity.

Can I ask why you are so against him?
He hasn't spent a lot of time in your hq, the qsc thread.
Nice to see you are venturing out of your source's home.

He has paid for testing and sharing the results.
You can say he shouldn't give a damn because he does not make his own oils or use any of this.
Conversely, I think his search for data makes me appreciate his findings even more.

As a homebrewer, I would have thought this is of interest to you, even if the substances do not come from where you buy yours from.
The thought that they have never damaged and killed anyone, which is always brought up, is fair enough.
I see how it can make sense.

But why should someone who shows an interest that comes from a different angle be necessarily shot down, in virtue of the "it's never been a problem so shut up" view?

I have asked Readalot to explain for us ignorant jackasses (me, number 1 here) what endotoxins are in relation to what goes on, on Meso.
And so I want to learn and be told why I should care about it.
Then we can all make our mind up.
Once I understand, I can decide whether I support the idea or not.

But to you, specifically, I want to ask why this is annoying you so much.

 

[Cipio]

@Yura(HYB) It would be nice to add Cialis in a 5mg pill dose, for those of us who take daily low doses for blood pressure and pre-workout pumps.

 

[Dirthand]

You have shitty raws

And overpriced

 

[readalot]

And overpriced

I think people will get confused now. I never identified the vendor for these raws.

 

[Dirthand]

I think people will get confused now. I never identified the vendor for these raws.

Yes thanks for clarifying.. its deffo not your oligation to.. Hopefully at some point you will see fit to.. as to not have any confusion on the board.. either way Godspeed friend!
Peace
D

 

[readalot]

Yes thanks for clarifying.. its deffo not your oligation to.. Hopefully at some point you will see fit to.. as to not have any confusion on the board.. either way Godspeed friend!
Peace
D

You as well. I was just giving an example to Narta of utility for the GCMS screening. As long as source gets his concentrations right the unsuspecting customer would never know what else is in the finished oil without GCMS analysis.

I'd want to know if there was a SERM/other synthetic androgen/estrogen added to my test C vial.

Tibolone, desacetylenyl-

Tibolone, desacetylenyl- | C19H26O2 | CID 91741016 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, safety/hazards/toxicity information, supplier lists, and more.

pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Tibolone

Tibolone | C21H28O2 | CID 444008 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, safety/hazards/toxicity information, supplier lists, and more.

pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[readalot]

what endotoxins are in relation to what goes on, on Meso

On my list. Data on the way I hope. Thanks.

 

[iris]

You as well. I was just giving an example to Narta of utility for the GCMS screening. As long as source gets his concentrations right the unsuspecting customer would never know what he is in the finished oil without GCMS analysis.

I'd want to know if there was a SERM/other androgen added to my test C vial.

Tibolone, desacetylenyl-

Tibolone, desacetylenyl- | C19H26O2 | CID 91741016 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, safety/hazards/toxicity information, supplier lists, and more.

pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Tibolone

Tibolone | C21H28O2 | CID 444008 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, safety/hazards/toxicity information, supplier lists, and more.

pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

May or may not help keep your bones nice and hard.
Fab

 

[iris]

On my list. Data on the way I hope. Thanks.

Make it short and simple for us peasants, lol.
Thank you

 

[narta]

Can I ask why you are so against him?
He hasn't spent a lot of time in your hq, the qsc thread.
Nice to see you are venturing out of your source's home.

He has paid for testing and sharing the results.
You can say he shouldn't give a damn because he does not make his own oils or use any of this.
Conversely, I think his search for data makes me appreciate his findings even more.

As a homebrewer, I would have thought this is of interest to you, even if the substances do not come from where you buy yours from.
The thought that they have never damaged and killed anyone, which is always brought up, is fair enough.
I see how it can make sense.

But why should someone who shows an interest that comes from a different angle be necessarily shot down, in virtue of the "it's never been a problem so shut up" view?

I have asked Readalot to explain for us ignorant jackasses (me, number 1 here) what endotoxins are in relation to what goes on, on Meso.
And so I want to learn and be told why I should care about it.
Then we can all make our mind up.
Once I understand, I can decide whether I support the idea or not.

But to you, specifically, I want to ask why this is annoying you so much.

I used to use qsc for raws, not anymore. I use him for peptides only. I 've already sent a friend who resides in another country to GA for finished oils and made an order for tabs on SSA. I like HYB for their tablet testing and readying an order. I spent some of my time on qsc because I treat it like a public square for chit chat, fun and serious talk when the occasion arises. I am not friends with any source whatsoever, they are all drug dealers.

Now for the enhanced testing that readalot is pursuing. Academically I don't disagree its interesting. But I am first and foremost a practical man, it ain't gonna fly. People look for cheap, reliable product. In order for such endeavor to succeed you will need to pursue the big fish (not the 100gr orders of us homebrewers) to stop buying for their UGLS and that is not going to happen. You know how many labs are out there that they don't even know, or give a flying f for the matter, Meso and Jano exist? And make thousand of $ each week? Many. I know atleast 3 that use qsc raws.

So how are readalot, or anyone for that matter is going to make any of the sources comply? He ain't. In the meantime its just become an endless chatter and noise in the board. When he started the whole ordeal in qsc I was reluctunt to even read the thread cause of the clutter. Now it spreads like a cancer.

This VERY POST is noise, has nothing to do with ordering, delivering or real problems.

Time to hit the stop button.

 

[iris]

I used to use qsc for raws, not anymore. I use him for peptides only. I 've already sent a friend who resides in another country to GA for finished oils and made an order for tabs on SSA. I like HYB for their tablet testing and readying an order. I spent some of my time on qsc because I treat it like a public square for chit chat, fun and serious talk when the occasion arises. I am not friends with any source whatsoever, they are all drug dealers.

Now for the enhanced testing that readalot is pursuing. Academically I don't disagree its interesting. But I am first and foremost a practical man, it ain't gonna fly. People look for cheap, reliable product. In order for such endeavor to succeed you will need to pursue the big fish (not the 100gr orders of us homebrewers) to stop buying for their UGLS and that is not going to happen. You know how many labs are out there that they don't even know, or give a flying f for the matter, Meso and Jano exist? And make thousand of $ each week? Many. I know atleast 3 that use qsc raws.

So how are readalot, or anyone for that matter is going to make any of the sources comply? He ain't. In the meantime its just become an endless chatter and noise in the board. When he started the whole ordeal in qsc I was reluctunt to even read the thread cause of the clutter. Now it spreads like a cancer.

This VERY POST is noise, has nothing to do with ordering, delivering or real problems.

Time to hit the stop button.

Go and report, the ordeal spreading like cancer.
I am sure the owner of the site does not want that and needs to be aware of it.

There is nothing I can personally do, apart from apologising for creating clutter that irks you because I may be interested in people's opinion about this, you included, involving you with my bullshit questions and adding to the ordeal.
It won't happen again.
Waste of oxygen, that I am, I know.

 

[readalot]

I used to use qsc for raws, not anymore. I use him for peptides only. I 've already sent a friend who resides in another country to GA for finished oils and made an order for tabs on SSA. I like HYB for their tablet testing and readying an order. I spent some of my time on qsc because I treat it like a public square for chit chat, fun and serious talk when the occasion arises. I am not friends with any source whatsoever, they are all drug dealers.

Now for the enhanced testing that readalot is pursuing. Academically I don't disagree its interesting. But I am first and foremost a practical man, it ain't gonna fly. People look for cheap, reliable product. In order for such endeavor to succeed you will need to pursue the big fish (not the 100gr orders of us homebrewers) to stop buying for their UGLS and that is not going to happen. You know how many labs are out there that they don't even know, or give a flying f for the matter, Meso and Jano exist? And make thousand of $ each week? Many. I know atleast 3 that use qsc raws.

So how are readalot, or anyone for that matter is going to make any of the sources comply? He ain't. In the meantime its just become an endless chatter and noise in the board. When he started the whole ordeal in qsc I was reluctunt to even read the thread cause of the clutter. Now it spreads like a cancer.

This VERY POST is noise, has nothing to do with ordering, delivering or real problems.

Time to hit the stop button.

Hence you'd agree the scope of this forum should be limited to procuring PEDs offered with the current HPLC standard. No attempts should be made to improve the standard?

In your opinion, it is sufficient.
The harm reduction component of this forum was met when HPLC testing for label API was adopted? The impurity portion of harm reduction is out of scope? Get your API and be happy? F the rest?

If that's the case why the continued ruse of harm reduction marketing here? The job is complete, yes?

 

[readalot]

I used to use qsc for raws, not anymore. I use him for peptides only. I 've already sent a friend who resides in another country to GA for finished oils and made an order for tabs on SSA. I like HYB for their tablet testing and readying an order. I spent some of my time on qsc because I treat it like a public square for chit chat, fun and serious talk when the occasion arises. I am not friends with any source whatsoever, they are all drug dealers.

Now for the enhanced testing that readalot is pursuing. Academically I don't disagree its interesting. But I am first and foremost a practical man, it ain't gonna fly. People look for cheap, reliable product. In order for such endeavor to succeed you will need to pursue the big fish (not the 100gr orders of us homebrewers) to stop buying for their UGLS and that is not going to happen. You know how many labs are out there that they don't even know, or give a flying f for the matter, Meso and Jano exist? And make thousand of $ each week? Many. I know atleast 3 that use qsc raws.

So how are readalot, or anyone for that matter is going to make any of the sources comply? He ain't. In the meantime its just become an endless chatter and noise in the board. When he started the whole ordeal in qsc I was reluctunt to even read the thread cause of the clutter. Now it spreads like a cancer.

This VERY POST is noise, has nothing to do with ordering, delivering or real problems.

Time to hit the stop button.

Post in thread 'Source QC and C of A (do you have one?)'

Jan 23, 2024

I’m not against adding more testing. My stance is that unfortunately I don’t think it’ll change anything. Let’s say a sample comes back with slight amounts of heavy metals, what are customers gunna do? There’s no other options besides going intl for pharma. Majority of guys don’t want do deal with customs which is why the UGL market is so big. You would think this would make guys second guess what they’re injecting but who knows. I’ve seen dudes buy vials of Tren from some guy brewing on a hot plate in a tent.

I tend to agree with you. But that does nothing to change the harm...

• Millard

• 
• 

I fucked up everyone. Got confused somehow. Millard got in my head and messed me up good. I wish he would quit teasing us. Now I see how the error of my ways!

My apologies. I won't waste another second of anyone's time having to click past all my bullshit. What a fool to waste my money and time. Everything is just fine. First it was "shut up and spend your own money". Now it's "you spent your money and are wasting everyone's time".

Sorry everyone. My bad.

A really big apology to @Excel.exe... sorry bro, I am going to let you down.