Jano "The ultimate Con-man and Liar?" thread...You be the judge

[MindlessWork]

The saddest part is that PM/anasci is now using Jano to test anabolics more similar to anaboliclab


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What a scam indeed!

 

[Dr JIM]

It seems Jano defines "test and testing" much differently than the rest of us, as in ANY "result" will do, LMAO!

And at least "anabolic labs" actually exists as a PED testing facility in Switzerland known as Simec AG!

I only mention this bc in my mind Jano has NEVER proven he legitimately "tests" ANYTHING!

 

[MindlessWork]

It seems Jano defines "test and testing" much differently than the rest of us, as in ANY "result" will do, LMAO!

And at least "anabolic labs" actually exists as a PED testing facility in Switzerland known as Simec AG!

I only mention this bc in my mind Jano has NEVER proven he legitimately "tests" ANYTHING!

Jano's "lab" isn't accredited I am sure...so no one should ever deal with him. Testing results factor into decisions by people to buy, so fake test results = buyer beware.

 

[Dr JIM]

Jano's "lab" isn't accredited I am sure...so no one should ever deal with him. Testing results factor into decisions by people to buy, so fake test results = buyer beware.

Is accreditation needed if a "lab" doesn't even exist, and I'd LOVE to see ANY evidence to the contrary.

We have no idea how deep this rabbit hole goes mate!

 

[Dr JIM]

If Jano is testing AAS why won't he post any evidence to that end, such as pic revealing some of his "fifty anabolic standards"?


Such as these;

Oh that's right, it's a "customs issue" lol

Bottom line; there is NO TESTING bc there is NO LAB!

 

[Dr JIM]

Or for those naysayers who need more proof. And to think I DONT test AAS!

 

[G.I. Bro]

The saddest part is that PM/anasci is now using Jano to test anabolics more similar to anaboliclab


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They should probably be made aware...if they choose to accept it.

Rather disturbing and disappointing.

 

[Dr JIM]

I hope I'm in error but doubt much, if any, of the adversarial content on this thread will be allowed on PM.

If that is the case, such benign neglect on behalf of PM speaks for itself!

 

[Dr JIM]

Oh and for those who believe they can simply place an order for RESEARCH STANDARDS as an AAS substitute, don't waste the time since your order won't make it off the printed page of the involved facility.

Because this is what is required in the U.S. at present with some exceptions for "HPLC, LC/MS etc ready" Testosterone which will contain ACN or some other solvent that you darn sure DONT want in your arse!

- a CURRENT DEA NUMBER

- an addy that coincides with what is listed on the DEA website

- transfer of such info to the involved STANDARD vendor who WILL perform a "background check"

AND IF YOUR PACKAGE made it out the front door for THAT addy on the certificate

- you will be REQUIRED to sign
a several page legally binding document attesting to ..... bla, bla, bla

- reveal the ORIGINAL DEA certificate

- a current DL or PASSPORT

There's probably a few other requirements I'm overlooking, but suffice it to say standard aquisition is such a huge pain in the arse very few facilities are willing to test AAS.

Jim
-

 

[CdnGuy]

At least we're both remaining consistent, bud

Oh the irony Mr Brolloks lol You're definitely holding up true to your end of this ^^^ statement .Trying to do some homework on Canada now? Shady is as Shady does lol Step ahead of you sir... tick tock tick tock

 

[Dr JIM]

Oh the irony Mr Brolloks lol You're definitely holding up true to your end of this ^^^ statement .Trying to do some homework on Canada now? Shady is as Shady does lol Step ahead of you sir... tick tock tick tock
View attachment 55979

AAS are schedule IV substances in Canada and as such would require some form of documentation for standard acquisition.
That being said, I can't imagine it would be as ridiculous as what is required in the U.S.!

More importantly US AAS "research standard" manufacturers must comply with existing U.S. law which limits the sale of such products to within the U.S., with few exceptions.

That being said some are able to bypass US law by producing AAS standards abroad, Europe in particular.

 

[Brolloks]

Oh the irony Mr Brolloks lol You're definitely holding up true to your end of this ^^^ statement in reply to being called out. Trying to do some homework on Canada now? lol Step ahead of you sir... tick tock tick tock

I had a mate with a coke problem. He also saw monsters under every rock. Your behaviour reminds me of him. Are you taking pain meds at the mo? When you're better, you'll blush at these paranoid posts of yours, but like with my buddy, I won't judge you

The Canadians talks domestic thread was on top of the UG subforum. I didn't realise it is frowned upon to browse it, and clicked on it because I'm curious by nature.

My offer still stands - rather than fill threads with our banter, why don't you rather PM me so that we can address your concerns? I'm keen to know what you suspect me of

 

[Brolloks]

AAS are schedule IV substances in Canada and as would require some form of documentation for standard aquisition.

More importantly US AAS research standard manufacturers must comply with U.S. law which limits the sale of such products to within the U.S., with few exceptions.

That being said some are able to bypass US law by producing AAS standards abroad, Europe in particular.

I believe the thread in question discusses UGLs in Canada. I'm neither in the US nor Canadia though, so struggling to follow what your point is.

 

[CdnGuy]

AAS are schedule IV substances in Canada and as such would require some form of documentation for standard acquisition.
That being said, I can't imagine it would be as ridiculous as what is required in the U.S.!

More importantly US AAS "research standard" manufacturers must comply with existing U.S. law which limits the sale of such products to within the U.S., with few exceptions.

That being said some are able to bypass US law by producing AAS standards abroad, Europe in particular.

Hmmm ok and apologies for sounding like a simpleton Dr Jim. But how does your post relate to mine?

 

[Dr JIM]

Nope you are CORRECT my error as my response was intended for another thread. Such efforts can be cumbersome when on an Iphone mate

 

[Brolloks]

Nope you are CORRECT my error as my response was intended for another thread. Such efforts can be cumbersome when on an Iphone mate

Out of interest, which thread was it intended for, Jim?

 

[CdnGuy]

Nope you are CORRECT my error as my response was intended for another thread. Such efforts can be cumbersome when on an Iphone mate

No harm no foul sir haha Just thought I was possibly going madd for a second lol

 

[CdnGuy]

Out of interest, which thread was it intended for, Jim?

LOL Priceless!!!!! That just put the cherry on top to end Christmas lol

 

[Dr JIM]

Actually for what its worth same thread different location, but this will do.

If you wanna know where such a response would have the greatest impact check out
where Jano states he has "FIFTY AAS STANDARDS" yet has since been disclosed by Mands he resides in Canada. lol

---- Heck 20 standards covers the overwhelming majority of AAS in use today

------ And Jano would have a limited access to legit standards bc THEY ARE SCHEDULED SUBSTANCES in CANADA

--- And worse yet Jano asked where he could acquire a GH standard a non-scheduled compound!

----- NO STANDARDS ===== NO TESTING ======= NO LAB!!!

 

[Brolloks]

Actually for what its worth same thread different location, but this will do.

Okay, Happy to blame the eggnog for the confusion.