Jano "The ultimate Con-man and Liar?" thread...You be the judge

I know exactly what his reply will be to my post too. That's what makes this very sad.

mands
Jano stated the tracking showed that customs seized the parcel. doesn't look like that to me.

I was curious to see if I could retroactively see my tracking on international shipping. I can. that tells me Jano should be able to see his.

@jano, would you be so kind as to show us the seizure notice? no more defections as I'm sure that's what will be coming in short order.
 
You are trying to gain mass credibility on the highest traffic board. Stop fucking acting like you are doing favors fuck boy.

After Mands answers the question of how much he had paid me for the testing, therefore explaining how big was the financial gain I got from this...


Where exactly was my test of #17 made public for gain/loss of me or anybody at all?
Can anybody point that out to me please?

Please, do that and I'll stuff a traffic cone up my ass.


The test I done for free out of my interest, to see if the testing conducted by Mands and JIM really does suck balls as I assumed it to.

It does, but based on the privacy between me and Mands, contrary to copypasting our discussion, I did not share that anywhere and did not use it as evidence against them.

Huh.
 
2.11.2016 The consignment was sent back to the sender - refused acceptance by the addressee.

Lol... It looks like he was too much of a pussy to even get the package the first time, let alone take it back to them.
NOT the picture jano painted... His version sounded like he actually had some balls. Thanks for confirming that he does not. :)
 
Last edited:
After Mands answers the question of how much he had paid me for the testing, therefore explaining how big was the financial gain I got from this...


Where exactly was my test of #17 made public for gain/loss of me or anybody at all?
Can anybody point that out to me please?

Please, do that and I'll stuff a traffic cone up my ass.


The test I done for free out of my interest, to see if the testing conducted by Mands and JIM really does suck balls as I assumed it to.

It does, but based on the privacy between me and Mands, contrary to copypasting our discussion, I did not share that anywhere and did not use it as evidence against them.

Huh.
 
where's jano's number one fanboy muscle and all his PM buddies, shouldn't they be defending him and all the great testing they've done over there. only to come here and shit on everything we do
 
Just an update for everyone here and at any other board @muscle96ss @Buck1973

I'm so pissed the package I had from them sending it back was thrown out in the trash. I have to apologize... haha Oh but wait. I took pics of it. :)

I decided to examine the pics and realized when you send to the another country they assign a new consignment code#. I tracked it and what do you think I found...?

Start from the bottom and work up :)

3.11.2016 The consignment was sent to the country of origin.

3.11.2016 Consignment posting number (reference code) assigned in the country of origin: CH*********US. Edited for safety.

2.11.2016 The consignment was sent back to the sender - refused acceptance by the addressee.

18.10.2016 Communication with the addressee about the consignment being deposited in interim warehouse - asked to prove the value of the goods.

18.10.2016 The consignment was deposited at post office of exchange.

17.10.2016 The consignment is being prepared for customs clearance.

17.10.2016 The consignment was accepted by post office of exchange.

13.10.2016 The consignment was sent to the Czech Republic.

11.10.2016 The consignment was posted.


As my one year old daughter would say, see you later bye bye.

mands

Damn you totally got me with that one. I never wanted buck or m96ss to see that.
 
You are trying to gain mass credibility on the highest traffic board. Stop fucking acting like you are doing favors fuck boy.

Agreed you BRUTE !

Unless the word INTEGRITY has no meaning, just because someone conducts testing for "nothing" does not mean folk should receive NOTHING, yet they should NEVER receive something MUCH WORSE, FABRICATED DATA!

Jim
 
I always thought something was fishy the way all his purity tests came back either 96% or 98%, even from raw sources known for sending out bunk.
 
I always thought something was fishy the way all his purity tests came back either 96% or 98%, even from raw sources known for sending out bunk.

And you should be, especially when supportive documentation is omitted, and the inclusion of such information is considered a routine practice by conventional lab standards.
 
That the answer you had foreseen?

How prophetic you're so flippant about this entire situation relying upon mockery as a means of minimizing the seriousness of these accusations.

To that end one things clear, you're proud of the testing you DIDNT conduct, and that is absolutely disgraceful Jano!
 
Back
Top