Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

Hello Jano i have a question i´d like to test something i have here, regular compounds, so i´m planning on drawing oils from amps and tranfering it to sterile vials, thing is amps usually have under 1 ml, is this enough or should i make sure the vial contains over 1 ml, for further instructions i´ll send email
It will be 2 samples, thanks.
 
Hello Jano i have a question i´d like to test something i have here, regular compounds, so i´m planning on drawing oils from amps and tranfering it to sterile vials, thing is amps usually have under 1 ml, is this enough or should i make sure the vial contains over 1 ml, for further instructions i´ll send email
It will be 2 samples, thanks.
Plenty enough. 0.5 ml is good if it doesn't leak.
 
Hello Jano i have a question i´d like to test something i have here, regular compounds, so i´m planning on drawing oils from amps and tranfering it to sterile vials, thing is amps usually have under 1 ml, is this enough or should i make sure the vial contains over 1 ml, for further instructions i´ll send email
It will be 2 samples, thanks.

I always send 2 ml to be sure that the oily solution is sufficient to perform the lab test ..
 
I always send 2 ml to be sure that the oily solution is sufficient to perform the lab test ..
Yes, it's better, but if sample is shipped in a good container (such as HPLC vials) it's not necessary and 0.5 ml is plenty.

In your case, there is a tiny small contamination with what looks like water in your sample. The fact that you sent 2 ml will help me with centrifuging the water out and getting a good result to you, so it's good you sent a little more.
 
Yes, it's better, but if sample is shipped in a good container (such as HPLC vials) it's not necessary and 0.5 ml is plenty.

In your case, there is a tiny small contamination with what looks like water in your sample. The fact that you sent 2 ml will help me with centrifuging the water out and getting a good result to you, so it's good you sent a little more.

Yes because I Put the oil in a used mini vial of hcg that I buy In local pharmacy. there is certainly some microscopic drop of physiological water inside the vial. I need to get some fragrance vials for future test.. I find it on amazon, I will buy it soon.
 
Yes, it's better, but if sample is shipped in a good container (such as HPLC vials) it's not necessary and 0.5 ml is plenty.

In your case, there is a tiny small contamination with what looks like water in your sample. The fact that you sent 2 ml will help me with centrifuging the water out and getting a good result to you, so it's good you sent a little more.

Sent you Email asking for further instructions, no reply yet, so if you please.
To this Email
info@janoshik.com
 
Only 7 days since i went to the post office to send samples i got results today from blind samples, results as expected.
At least in my personal opinion this guy is very legit, i´ll be sending more samples in the near future, did not do it before cause of the fear of sending AAS via postal services but everything was smooth.
Thanks a lot and i´m very happy with jano´s work, didn´t have to ask for results or anything i was shocked of how fast this was done.
 
Only 7 days since i went to the post office to send samples i got results today from blind samples, results as expected.
At least in my personal opinion this guy is very legit, i´ll be sending more samples in the near future, did not do it before cause of the fear of sending AAS via postal services but everything was smooth.
Thanks a lot and i´m very happy with jano´s work, didn´t have to ask for results or anything i was shocked of how fast this was done.
This was also my experience with him.
Instead of typing stupid things here send blind samples to him incl. a controle sample with pharmacy testosterone to proof his accuracy and you will see it fits
 
I have not tested DES yet. Regarding LR3 i i think 4/6 were on point, 1/6 underdosed, 1/6 bunk.

TP had legit stuff tested with me year or two (or three lol) ago, not sure if he still sells it.
Where are these results at with the lr3? (With DAC)
 
Where are these results at with the lr3? (With DAC)
With the customers. I am not sure whether they made it public.

TP did, I believe. Looking through his posts of ProfessionalMuscle might yield the result.

I am not sure what you mean by (With DAC). LR3 has nothing to do with drug affinity complex, which is a trademarked technology with similar purpose, but ultimately different.
 
I bough one kit of Godtropin 240iu, I took the label, I sent to jano for lab analysis, I didn't tell him where come from this vial, so the result should be more accurate.

so this is result:

its 191aa, legit gh.
purity is 97.058%, which is not bad as generic
dimer and related protein is 0.006%,which is very very little, its very good as generic.
dose is 21.49iu, not 24iu

so what do u think ?
 

Attachments

  • Test Report #03490.png
    Test Report #03490.png
    212 KB · Views: 38
I bough one kit of Godtropin 240iu, I took the label, I sent to jano for lab analysis, I didn't tell him where come from this vial, so the result should be more accurate.

so this is result:

its 191aa, legit gh.
purity is 97.058%, which is not bad as generic
dimer and related protein is 0.006%,which is very very little, its very good as generic.
dose is 21.49iu, not 24iu

so what do u think ?

Not bad as a generic hgh. how much did you pay for this kit of 240 ui ?

Thank you for sharing
 
Back
Top