janoshik
Subscriber
Apparently after another set of terrible results for a certain unnamed sponsor on a different forum, suddenly DWBO started thinking about me a lot after half a year of no interaction and he also began reading scientific literature which enabled him to figure out that I am a scammer and unable to test anything. So he made a thread about me in the Scammers forum.
Seems plausible, right?
Unfortunately, as I am banned I am unable to answer there, which is quite convenient.
Otherwise I might be able to point out that DWBO's arguments are outright stupid and made up to fit a certain narrative he is trying to push now:
1. you still need to weight the standards for GC/MS. Every undergrad can tell you that.
2. what he hopelessly attempted to describe is identification part of GC/MS, not quantitation (getting mg/ml). Again, undergrad knowledge.
3. I don't even use GC/MS and everybody knows that I do HPLC only.
You don't even need to be an undergrad for that, people who have nothing to do with chemistry around here all know I use HPLC, not GC.
Real good job trying to prove something about me by failing to interpret a publication about a technique I don't even use.
I hope that an alchemist with an advanced mortar and pestel degree made it clear enough now. Or maybe he could get some undergrad to explain it for him - I'm sure that certain sponsors would gladly pay for those lessons
Seems plausible, right?
Unfortunately, as I am banned I am unable to answer there, which is quite convenient.
Otherwise I might be able to point out that DWBO's arguments are outright stupid and made up to fit a certain narrative he is trying to push now:
1. you still need to weight the standards for GC/MS. Every undergrad can tell you that.
2. what he hopelessly attempted to describe is identification part of GC/MS, not quantitation (getting mg/ml). Again, undergrad knowledge.
3. I don't even use GC/MS and everybody knows that I do HPLC only.
You don't even need to be an undergrad for that, people who have nothing to do with chemistry around here all know I use HPLC, not GC.
Real good job trying to prove something about me by failing to interpret a publication about a technique I don't even use.
I hope that an alchemist with an advanced mortar and pestel degree made it clear enough now. Or maybe he could get some undergrad to explain it for him - I'm sure that certain sponsors would gladly pay for those lessons
Last edited: