Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

[Sampei]

Has anyone had multiple pieces in a sample tested? Just wondering what the extra cost would be to have all 3 pills of a sample tested.

30 extra each pill

 

[readalot]

Great work by Jano purchasing the reference standard for Test E to chase this question down and put it to rest. Working on the weekend to answer these important questions for the community here (man after my own heart) .

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Nov 11, 2024

This too. Not clear to me if your HPLC method as is can discern -ene (missing one H) impurities from test ester.

I don't think so. I think it's two H's though.

Two carbons have to loose one to free themselves up for the loving embrace of a double bond.

Which purity above is closer to reality? GCMS or HPLC?

Impossible to tell without running GCMS on the reference standard as well.

I didn't see you consider the heat induced dehydrogenation possibility for the delta-6 TE example.

Not entirely confident I did.

But guess what I just did?

...

• janoshik

• 
• 

Thank you. It's been a pleasure interacting with you Sir. Appreciate all the support and unfortunate the legal issues around all of this stifles more free collaboration.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

If AAS oil samples crash during transit to you, due to low temperatures, does that create a problem with testing? Or do you have a protocol for heating crashed vials?

 

[Sampei]

If AAS oil samples crash during transit to you, due to low temperatures, does that create a problem with testing? Or do you have a protocol for heating crashed vials?

I believe Jano is able to heat a crashed vial xD But it's a nice question I'm curious of the answer too

 

[janoshik]

If we can see it's crashed we always heat it up to dissolve it completely. (aas oils)

 

[janoshik]

Quick note: We've ran an aggregate test on a tirzepatide and found no detectable aggregates.

*shrug*

 

[Sampei]

Quick note: We've ran an aggregate test on a tirzepatide and found no detectable aggregates.

*shrug*

@Ghoul

 

[Ghoul]

@Ghoul

Quick note: We've ran an aggregate test on a tirzepatide and found no detectable aggregates.

*shrug*

Aggregates take time to form, post reconstitution. "Incubate" is the term I believe. The analysis I've seen of semaglutide had none immediately after reconstitution, detectable amounts after 3 days in the refrigerator and continued to increase in number and size with time.

Density ("viscosity") is another factor that determines the rate of aggregate formation, so how thoroughly the sample is diluted will play a role.

I'm sure Janoshik doesn't intend this to be taken to mean "tirz is aggregate free", case closed, since aggregates are formed dynamically, not "it's present or not" like other contaminants.

Think of very slowly forming crystals as an analogy.

I'm thinking of saving a vial of Tesamorelin from a batch I have for posterity which appears to go from clear to visible particulates forming after a few hours at room temperature. After being filtered again (.2) half a day later more visibile particles appear.

 

[RintintinRedRocket]

Two questions regarding testing of AAS.

First what volume of an AAS is needed to perform testing? For instance, can I place 3ml from a 10ml vial into a sterile vial for testing.

Second, is my understanding regarding AAS screening quantitative and AAS screening identification, correct? AAS screening quantitative identifies the amount of an AAS per ml and that it is the AAS, while screening identification testing only test if the substance is the AAS.

 

[iris]

Quick note: We've ran an aggregate test on a tirzepatide and found no detectable aggregates.

*shrug*

@readalot

 

[janoshik]

I know nothing of all that, we just accidentally put tirzepatide sample though SEC and thought it might interest someone. We usually test samples as soon as reasonably possible after dissolution.

Two questions regarding testing of AAS.

First what volume of an AAS is needed to perform testing? For instance, can I place 3ml from a 10ml vial into a sterile vial for testing.

Second, is my understanding regarding AAS screening quantitative and AAS screening identification, correct? AAS screening quantitative identifies the amount of an AAS per ml and that it is the AAS, while screening identification testing only test if the substance is the AAS.

0.5 ml is plenty enough.

Sterile vial is not necessary for AAS quantity / identity test.

AAS screening quantitative give you the common AAS present + their quantity while ID only only the list of present AAS.

Cheers

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

What's the typical turnaround time for endotoxin testing (of AAS oils or peptides)?

 

[Sampei]

What's the typical turnaround time for endotoxin testing (of AAS oils or peptides)?

2 weeks

 

[AJDC]

We can tell whether something is there or not usually. Other stuff we cannot afford to take on right now.

Mannitol is not a polymer.

If they can name (an existing) polymer, we should be able to detect it.
I had trouble figuring out what Biloxone could be. Didn't manage to find out CAS etc.



1) I strongly don't believe it is so.
2) We have LCMS, we can detect the molecular mass of HGH and we've never seen anything suspicious.


Apologies, cannot listen to the video rn, but I hope my reaction is sufficient.

This is very interesting.

Would Chinese UGL with 99% purity and low dimer would yield the same (or better) results in terms of muscle gain, fat loss, etc. compared to something like Serostim?

In other words, is Serostim or other pharma HGH a waste of money when we have very high quality Chinese HGH for much much cheaper?

 

[Ghoul]

This is very interesting.

Would Chinese UGL with 99% purity and low dimer would yield the same (or better) results in terms of muscle gain, fat loss, etc. compared to something like Serostim?

In other words, is Serostim or other pharma HGH a waste of money when we have very high quality Chinese HGH for much much cheaper?

If money's no object than Pharma is still going to be superior for a myriad of reasons. Is it worth the premium for the vast majority? No.

Getting 95% of the benefit for 10% of the cost makes UGL the better choice in most in instances.