Readalots Enhanced Testing

you saw the sterility tests? why is not shared in here :(
This thread reviews the testing i paid for.

Nice job on the sterility tests. Good work.

Also read the thread. I've given you plenty of credit on the forum including here.

 
you saw the sterility tests? why is not shared in here :(

Yeah, it's really bad you' ve come on this thread, that has nothing to do with you and what you sell just to spite OP.
This is about products that were provided by someone else, in order to put OP's project in practice.

You have been praised by OP and many other members here (myself included, if I may say) for the testing you have conducted.

We know that it has brought a lot of good attention onto you.
Yet, that it is not something you mention.

Through a bit of extra testing and the offering of a superior product, which the tests have also helped highlight, I have seen members that were permanent residents in other threads now buying from you.
People that were so assiduously attentive and obsequious to other sources that I honestly thought were some kind of admin/staff for them.

A couple from the Qsc thread come to mind.
But now there they are, buying from you for themselves, their bfs and mates.

You go and do your thing without the spectacle you are attempting, here.
The tests you have just reposted on OP's thread are on your analytical thread and they don't belong here.

Delete the post above mine, if you care to look a little less pathetic.
 
Last edited:
Like I said, these tests are not applicable to the title of thread. What do you think @Sampei? A little much?

But it is refreshing and commendable for a vendor to test their products above the current Meso standard. Well done on the testing. Feel free to come here and post your endotoxin results on finished oils as well.

I'll also mention this vendor tested his finished oils for metals. So you are a good way through the enhanced testing panel GA. Keep up the great work on the testing. Once you complete the testing I'll happily recognize you to be the first vendor to accomplish the feat.
 
Last edited:
this vendor kept his word for sterility test and heavy metal test, got accused of false accusations as well and never got an sorry, despite proofing the claims wrong repeatedly.

Stop the mass spamming of your endotoxin results, it is getting out of hand. If the sources would consider testing the endotoxin they will, but not the way you keep digging into the same question over and over.

i didnt want to ruin this place, but you keep commenting about the same stuff despite i gave you the answer of it.

GA kept his word for providing sterility and heavy metal test, which have been done and available for yall to see.

have an fantastic day everyone.
 
Project 3. Forthcoming.

Project Code Name:
An Honest and Ethical Vendor can make a difference.

Why GCMS (along with HPLC) is your friend. Of course some vendors will continue to not test their raws.

Test C and Test E raws are very pure and g2g, right? "Don't look behind the curtain, we'll go back and dial in the concentrations; everything A-ok. Extra stuff on the house!"

View attachment 301207View attachment 301208
Project 3 cont.

Comparison between GCMS purity (area counts approximation) and HPLC purity. Use drop down above to see the previously shared GCMS TIC tables for Test C and Test E.


Test E:

ZS9FQXAG2LKITE7M6J0B.webp

Vs.



Test C:


09NCAYGLT4MB2HZP835S.webp

Vs.


Major discrepancy on relative volatilities / ionization, or is HPLC picking up more than just the API and counting as API? Jano did mention the possibility of a testosterone impurity (-ene form missing one hydrogen) being a potential false positive with HPLC.

There isn't going to be any significant difference between the test ester and the test ester impurities on volatility or ionization in the MS.


Love to discuss this. Is reported HPLC purity accurate for these two raws?

UHPLC to the rescue?

 
Last edited:
There isn't going to be any significant difference between the test ester and the test ester impurities on volatility or ionization in the MS.
Correct, I agree, but we can't be (yet) 100% sure whether the changes are not induced by the heat from the GCMS causing loss of hydrogen.

UHPLC to the rescue?

The HPLC used for anabolic steroids is actually UHPLC (Shimadzu as well!).

Generally, in the industry you don't differentiate the two, UHPLC (and UPLC) are subset of HPLC, but generally, it does *not* play a role in the quality of the separation.

The main differences are in solvent consumption, speed, easiness to link it to LCMS etc.
 
Correct, I agree, but we can't be (yet) 100% sure whether the changes are not induced by the heat from the GCMS causing loss of hydrogen.


The HPLC used for anabolic steroids is actually UHPLC (Shimadzu as well!).

Generally, in the industry you don't differentiate the two, UHPLC (and UPLC) are subset of HPLC, but generally, it does *not* play a role in the quality of the separation.

The main differences are in solvent consumption, speed, easiness to link it to LCMS etc.
Thanks for the comments.

So we are back to this:

can you detect this impurity with your standard HPLC method?



As always, I appreciate and admire your scientific curiosity and willingness to discuss all these intricacies. It's the weekend after all. Well done!

Great question whether these alkene variants of Test Cyp/Enan (USP testosterone impurities, etc) are typically counted in the Test Cyp/Enan pile for HPLC.
 
Last edited:
Might have missed it. But it’s implied that SHA has already tested for heavy metal contamination, or is now testing?
 
Thanks for the comments.

So we are back to this:

can you detect this impurity with your standard HPLC method?



As always, I appreciate and admire your scientific curiosity and willingness to discuss all these intricacies. It's the weekend after all. Well done!

Great question whether these alkene variants of Test Cyp/Enan (USP testosterone impurities, etc) are typically counted in the Test Cyp/Enan pile for HPLC.

For comparison...



TE and impurity.webp

TC impurities.webp


Would be funny if in a few months everyone wants to join the class action lawsuit against the AAS suppliers wanting a refund on that 10-20% of the their test ester they thought they were getting but weren't.

200 mg/ml [Test Cyp | Test E] becomes 160-180 mg/ml. With API concentration in play, that would get folks attention again. I look forward to learning more.

And that pharma COA one more time:




See those testosterone impurity values?
 
Last edited:
For comparison...



View attachment 302164

View attachment 302166


Would be funny if in a few months everyone wants to join the class action lawsuit against the AAS suppliers wanting a refund on that 10-20% of the their test ester they thought they were getting but weren't.

200 mg/ml [Test Cyp | Test E] becomes 160-180 mg/ml. With API concentration in play, that would get folks attention again. I look forward to learning more.

And that pharma COA one more time:




See those testosterone impurity values?
I like the discussion that gentleman, Mcflyfast, was having with Jano and when he asked whether he knew how/if these different variants were metabolised differently.
I am going to read a little more through that thread later on.

Thank you.
 
I like the discussion that gentleman, Mcflyfast, was having with Jano and when he asked whether he knew how/if these different variants were metabolised differently.
I am going to read a little more through that thread later on.

Thank you.
Yes they are USP impurities and not active hormone (or at the least don't possess the same effect at the androgen receptor) once the ester is cleaved.

My pleasure.
 
I'm pretty new to this world, started legit TRT this year, and have been lurking this forum, and sources for awhile to determine whether I could go UGL and save some money.

Not going to lie readalot, I saw you in a ton of source forums I thought you were just trolling. Just reading the entirety of this thread and the fact you threw up that money shows how genuine the concern is, a thanks for your time and effort this has all been a good read.
 
I'm pretty new to this world, started legit TRT this year, and have been lurking this forum, and sources for awhile to determine whether I could go UGL and save some money.

Not going to lie readalot, I saw you in a ton of source forums I thought you were just trolling. Just reading the entirety of this thread and the fact you threw up that money shows how genuine the concern is, a thanks for your time and effort this has all been a good read.
Thanks very much for taking the time to share that. It's the love of learning and feedback like yours that makes all this work worthwhile. I appreciate it.

saw you in a ton of source forums

That is a useful data point. I didn't know I had an
impersonator (?).

In my time I have been on TNation (banned twice and now on "mute"), ExcelMale (banned x 3 or 4), MesoRx (2x soft ban, still here), SST (still there), and ProMuscle (don't post, what's the point? LoL).

So I wouldn't say a ton. The first two aren't source forums. If there are other ones I am on please let me know haha.

Take care.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top