Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

It's okay to send it in like that, but we love when people ask
Jano the results I'm getting are not the one that I should. Can you have a look at it, it will probably reduce the work you gotta have to go back and forth fixing the reports afterwards.
 
Jano the results I'm getting are not the one that I should. Can you have a look at it, it will probably reduce the work you gotta have to go back and forth fixing the reports afterwards.
As far as I am aware, the only issue is that some of your reports were missing raw data and us not authorizing some additional custom requests, am I mistaken?

Thank you.
 
As far as I am aware, the only issue is that some of your reports were missing raw data and us not authorizing some additional custom requests, am I mistaken?

Thank you.
Yeah I was referring to the raw data not being attached, I'm a bit unhappy about the "custom request" because I had requested the specific purity of the RAWS since the first time I ordered the tests and I wasn't challenged on it so I assumed it was going to be provided as I requested and now when the results are coming in I'm being told I won't get it that way.

Anyway I guess I'll have to suck it up, hopefully at least I'll get all the results sooner than later.
 
Understandable.

I've scolded the mailbox team both for not refusing that outright request and for not clearing the raw data with me first.
I have few quite important questions to be answered on the raw data just received on the purity tests of raw, I would prefer for now to do it in private, so please check your private messages here.
 
I have few quite important questions to be answered on the raw data just received on the purity tests of raw, I would prefer for now to do it in private, so please check your private messages here.
Please, mind it is not necessary to mirror the questions in DMs, email and urge about them in the thread as well. Thank you.
 
Please, mind it is not necessary to mirror the questions in DMs, email and urge about them in the thread as well. Thank you.

I never know with who I speak with on the email, and only you can explain to me the data I receive Jano.

You should have a personal email just for technical questions.
 
I'm working out with Jano some stuff but I gotta say that he was kind enough to not charge me twice for a mistake I made in ordering a test that gave the wrong result as I understood wrong something and due to that I received an useless result even so he ran the lab test properly.

He will run again the test for free and on that I have to give him credit 100%.
 
We always sign ourselves in the email and only I sign as "Janoshik."

Before any email gets to me, my team tries to handle it first.

Our email shows 30000 conversations ( I could estimate average to be 5 emails per conversation ) in past 365 days.

If there was no filter between me and people, I couldn't handle it.

I'm on verge of handling the demand as it is and we're refusing a lot of business due to that already. Unfortunately.
 
We always sign ourselves in the email and only I sign as "Janoshik."

Before any email gets to me, my team tries to handle it first.

Our email shows 30000 conversations ( I could estimate average to be 5 emails per conversation ) in past 365 days.

If there was no filter between me and people, I couldn't handle it.

I'm on verge of handling the demand as it is and we're refusing a lot of business due to that already. Unfortunately.
You gotta expand Jano, create an empire. You are young you can definitely do it.
 
We're taking people in as fast as we can, but if we take in too many too fast, the service will start noticeably deteriorating, which I'd like to avoid.

Right now we are 3 seniors overseeing 5 juniors (on top of our usual workload) in the lab and I feel like my face will melt and our PhD forgot her name a couple of times and had trouble remembering at this point.

But we're working on it.
 
@janoshik are you able to identify & quantify excipients in HGH? I would be curious to see the testing between Serostim vs popular chinese UGL hgh since the "anabolic bodybuilding" crew and "experts" over there discuss UGL containing "polymers" probably just mannitol...
We can tell whether something is there or not usually. Other stuff we cannot afford to take on right now.

Mannitol is not a polymer.

If they can name (an existing) polymer, we should be able to detect it.
I had trouble figuring out what Biloxone could be. Didn't manage to find out CAS etc.


"its all the additives added to UGL hgh that change the daltons, molecular weight of the hgh, that effect absorption" - Big Paul

"when you then add Biloxone, polymers and all these other fillers it doesnt seem to absorb at the same rate, and youve changed the molecular weight of the whole thing" -Kurt Havens
1) I strongly don't believe it is so.
2) We have LCMS, we can detect the molecular mass of HGH and we've never seen anything suspicious.


Apologies, cannot listen to the video rn, but I hope my reaction is sufficient.
 
Sorry if this has already been answered. I had a look and I couldn’t find the answer.

As different compounds cost different amounts to test, how does blind testing work?
 
Sorry if this has already been answered. I had a look and I couldn’t find the answer.

As different compounds cost different amounts to test, how does blind testing work?
No problem, that's actually a good question that deserves to be reiterated here and there.

Blind testing is offered only for particular groups of samples, eg. blind test for common anabolic steroids only or blind test only for peptides that we routinely test etc.

Blind testing, as in you send something completely unknown doesn't exist and no laboratory in the world will accept something like that.

Cheers
 
No problem, that's actually a good question that deserves to be reiterated here and there.

Blind testing is offered only for particular groups of samples, eg. blind test for common anabolic steroids only or blind test only for peptides that we routinely test etc.

Blind testing, as in you send something completely unknown doesn't exist and no laboratory in the world will accept something like that.

Cheers
Thanks for the spoon feeding. It’s very tasty. Does that mean no blind testing for aromatase inhibitors or pde5is?
 
Thanks for the spoon feeding. It’s very tasty. Does that mean no blind testing for aromatase inhibitors or pde5is?
Common AI's (letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane) are actually included in the AAS test.

1x Blind common anabolic steroid and aromatase inhibitors screening - orals (pills, tablets, capsules) x 120 USD = 120 USD
1x Blind common anabolic steroid and aromatase inhibitors screening - raws x 120 USD = 120 USD



PDE5s are too complicated - there's a different test for tadalafil, different one for sildenafil and different one for vardenafil. Not even talking about anavafil, amino tadalafil etc etc.
There's very litlle demand for blind testing those so any demand for such will get a personalized offer, but expect it to be much more expensive, solely due to amount of additional work necessary.
 
Common AI's (letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane) are actually included in the AAS test.

1x Blind common anabolic steroid and aromatase inhibitors screening - orals (pills, tablets, capsules) x 120 USD = 120 USD
1x Blind common anabolic steroid and aromatase inhibitors screening - raws x 120 USD = 120 USD



PDE5s are too complicated - there's a different test for tadalafil, different one for sildenafil and different one for vardenafil. Not even talking about anavafil, amino tadalafil etc etc.
There's very litlle demand for blind testing those so any demand for such will get a personalized offer, but expect it to be much more expensive, solely due to amount of additional work necessary.
Thanks, man. I’ll be making an order when my raws get here.
 
Has anyone had multiple pieces in a sample tested? Just wondering what the extra cost would be to have all 3 pills of a sample tested.
 
Back
Top