MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services
- Thread starter janoshik
- Start date
janoshik
Subscriber
Turnaround of routine in-house tests after the receipt:
Average: 5 days,
Guaranteed: 21 days for in-house tests. Full refund and free results if exceeded.
Expedited testing - rush fee:
100% surcharge, results within 2 working days of receipt
Rush fee can be applied only to in-house tests.
Cheers
That's my thinking.
If you see reports on it from us daily it's usually 5% or less. With AAS eg. we usually hover around 2% for common ones in oils and it's pretty much impossible to achieve any less.
10% on less common peptides usually (because we test almost a hundred of those).
HCG can have incredible variety. It's not a specific chemical, but usually a mixture, so with same content, the activity IU may vary. Immunoassay has a stated margin of error like that and we sort of made the number up based on experience with HCG here. However, the formula we're using *somehow* almost always ends up being right about good quality HCG.
Btw, in recent months, it seems like many manufacturers of HCG finally hit the jackpot and can consistently produce HCG that tests on point with me - so it might be worth it to inquire about their secret
Heavy Metals right now uses EDX, which is semiquantitative measurement. It's more of a non-concern, concern, throw it away kind of thing unless specifically calibrated for the specific kind of a sample.
GCMS screening is a screening ID test - just provides identification, margin of error [quatitative] is not really applicable here.
Calculation of margin of error is based on your confidence level (usually 95%), times standard deviation over number of measurements squared, but I admit, with some of the tests with the dataset I have it is outright impossible to calculate (like HPLC HCG) so we pretty much guess a maximum possible ballpark.
janoshik
Subscriber
Yes, but unfortunately we'd charge pretty outrageously for that, as we'd pretty much have to develop a method for it.
janoshik
Subscriber
We hire models from the company budget to lip sync my commentary and look fabulous.
Cheers
carbon adams
Banned
That wouldn’t even tell us how much bacterium nitrates are in the oil ?
It would just tell us , it has bacterium nitrate ?
Where is the test that would give us the percentage or detection limit of each unsterile thingy majiggy that may be In the product ?
Or do you have the whole nsit library set for pharma standards detection limit for each and every one in the library based on what they are ?
Is the sterility testing he mentions even referring to your GCSM one ?
Because I was under the impression if I send you a sample and it turns out to have fecal matter in it , I would get the percentage or calculation of the fecal matter and see if it above or below the pharma detection limit , but instead I will just get a test that says “fecal matter detected”?
But how do you calculate this ? What made you arrive at such calculations?
Cheers
bigboy420
Member
Hope you will in the future
bighunanballs
Well-known Member
This would be nice to see oils normally tested for EO, guaiacol, maybe even % BB and main carrier oil ID and percentage.
bighunanballs
Well-known Member
Ballpark idea of costs? This would be a particularly useful test
bigboy420
Member
This should be standard!
bighunanballs
Well-known Member
I agree. After a standard is created it would be commonplace to add these to typical oil testing
bighunanballs
Well-known Member
Ive asked this in one of my other forums with access to vendors with analytical labs or in house analytics in the cannabis industry. will see if they have any thoughts on this type of testing
Grey Spartan
Member
Take my money!I could have retired years ago my friend, I've been lucky with investing my income, but I can't imagine what else I could be doing and don't want to let people down
More sources should be testing for guac since he provides it
janoshik
Subscriber
>EO
qualitatively we already can with GCMS screening
>guaiacol
offered
>% BB
offered along with BA
>main carrier oil ID and percentage
just a guesswork. Oils are mixes of fatty acids in different ratios that vary with season, type, etc etc etc etc.
qualitatively we already can with GCMS screening
>guaiacol
offered
>% BB
offered along with BA
>main carrier oil ID and percentage
just a guesswork. Oils are mixes of fatty acids in different ratios that vary with season, type, etc etc etc etc.
bighunanballs
Well-known Member
Could we get those tests on your pricing page? Unless I'm not seeing them?
janoshik
Subscriber
1x GCMS screening x 170 USD = 170 USD
1x Guaiacol in AAS oil x 15 USD = 15 USD
1x BA/BB testing x 30 USD = 30 USD
Not everything is on the website.
1x Guaiacol in AAS oil x 15 USD = 15 USD
1x BA/BB testing x 30 USD = 30 USD
Not everything is on the website.
Jano do you have the time to check email? You sent me a result without the raw data (paid and requested) attached.1x GCMS screening x 170 USD = 170 USD
1x Guaiacol in AAS oil x 15 USD = 15 USD
1x BA/BB testing x 30 USD = 30 USD
Not everything is on the website.
bighunanballs
Well-known Member
1x GCMS screening x 170 USD = 170 USD
1x Guaiacol in AAS oil x 15 USD = 15 USD
1x BA/BB testing x 30 USD = 30 USD
Not everything is on the website.
Thanks man, is gcms already done on normal aas qualitative and quantitative screening or is that hplc and this gcms would be an Adder on top to identify these additional solvents?
Thanks
janoshik
Subscriber
My friend, when we get to it in the mailbox, we will get to it.
I feel it is not nice to expect of us (and me especially) to check and reply emails when we have it clearly stated we don't work mailbox on the weekends. It's not like I can do anything on the weekend either, as the EDX machine and computer are off, so I'm not getting to the raw data until after the weekend and national holiday anyway.
Thank you for your understanding.
