Karius - ALP / BAL Lists -

I look at it like this- can I go over to ab and post negative feedback on any source over there? No! That includes provisional sources. Them guys paid the 400.00 for the month to be there, so best believe negative feedback will quickly be pushed to the side and either the thread will be told to, "get back on track" or the naysayer will possibly be banned. That's just the reality of it. Like I said earlier I like ab, but refuse to be naive to the big picture.
When a source pays good money to be on a board they expect to be protected and that includes removing any negative reviews or any posts critical of the source.
 
you guys can believe what you want. anyone who knows me will tell you that I'm very fair when it comes to managing issues with board/people. I have to wonder how many underdosed/fake crap you guys must've encountered to be so distrusting, even going as far as accusing me for working for a source(I don't btw). I guess I'm lucky that I had very few experiences with bad gear since the 90's when everything was HG. As for the pic request, if you've been to any local shows or even pro shows, you'll know what I'm talking about. I actually like GP because few of their stuff I've used actually worked great for me. I know a famous IFBB guru who puts all his athletes on GP this is not a lie. obviously there are a lot of haters everywhere and a lot especially here. it's hard to believe someone praising the gear when they hardly look like they workout, let alone juice. the brands I trust I have either experienced it or seen through positive evidence. somehow people are brainwashed that there are no legit gear around... well not my problem...
as for brutus, he deserved the ban. if you read that thread carefully you'll know. it was clear his motive was to just badmouth K even when he offered to compensate for it. again, not my problem, but I gotta moderate my board. just because you dont moderate this board, dont think everywhere else is.
and mindlesswork, no worries for thinking the way you're. you'll soon realize I'm not the bad guy they're trying to make me look like. my conscience is always clear.
 
@myosaurus, thanks for telling your side of the story and clarifying your viewpoint. As you may already know, Meso is an uncensored board and no one really calls the shots on here (of course Millard only steps in if things got waaaayy out of hand)
 
as for brutus, he deserved the ban. if you read that thread carefully you'll know. it was clear his motive was to just badmouth K even when he offered to compensate for it. again, not my problem, but I gotta moderate my board.

Bullshit. Your post wasn't that of an unbiased moderator, it was vindictive and childish. And it had nothing to do with Brutus' statements about Karius. It was because Brutus was arguing with that sexual deviant, ItalianMuscle and you were protecting your buddy.

You succeeded in making Regular look like a liar, though. Reg gave Brutus and Johnny his assurances that they could leave a negative review at AB without fear retaliation or of being banned. Too bad Regular refused to intervene. It proved his assurances were bullshit all along.
 
Bullshit. Your post wasn't that of an unbiased moderator, it was vindictive and childish. And it had nothing to do with Brutus' statements about Karius. It was because Brutus was arguing with that sexual deviant, ItalianMuscle and you were protecting your buddy.

You succeeded in making Regular look like a liar, though. Reg gave Brutus and Johnny his assurances that they could leave a negative review at AB without fear retaliation or of being banned. Too bad Regular refused to intervene. It proved his assurances were bullshit all along.
A very good reason why censored boards are a problem. Not to defend him, but I can see why Myosaurus had to do what he had to because of the pressure from the board admin and owners. They call the shots and direct the mods on the rules of the road on such boards.
 
There uptite over there.its just like a tren show.everyone was jumping on band wagon throwing accusations at my thread.it was under ugl reviews and source check.....I guess I was schilling in there opinion.
 
anyone who knows me will tell you that I'm very fair when it comes to managing issues with board/people.

Does a "very fair" moderator call people opportunistic scumbags, meth addicts, and wish them to burn in hell? I'm curious because that kind of behavior falls way outside my definition of fair.

it was clear his motive was to just badmouth K even when he offered to compensate for it.

If Brutus just wanted to "badmouth K," how does that make him an opportunistic scumbag?

As you said, he already had an offer for a refund from K so I'm not sure what opportunity you're accusing him of seeking.

It's clear that you weren't interested in being "very fair," and by calling Brutus an "opportunistic scumbag," you certainly weren't interested in being factual. In fact, your post does more to make you sound like the "bad guy" you say we're accusing you of being than anything that's been written by anyone here.
 
Not to defend him, but I can see why Myosaurus had to do what he had to because of the pressure from the board admin and owners. They call the shots and direct the mods on the rules of the road on such boards.

You can see why a moderator had to say this to a member?

proxy.php


That^^^ abuse is what you consider the "rules of the road"?
 
You can see why a moderator had to say this to a member?

proxy.php


That^^^ abuse is what you consider the "rules of the road"?
Sorry if I worded things wrong


I agree Myo is in the wrong for making that sort of a post and not making an effort to be reasonable in that case. As I don't have an account over there to read the whole thread and form my own judgment I have to say Myo is pretty much rather being unfair in that case. That's what I call bad moderating, agreed. If Myo had to defend Karius despite the evidence that makes K look bad it could been better handled.

For him to go off on Brutus like that is wrong IMO. And the rules of the road need to be changed over there I feel.
 
I think you got banned for posting pics of your stash. It seemed like you were trying to source on a board where sources pay to be there. Gk just has a sense of humor.
 
I think you got banned for posting pics of your stash. It seemed like you were trying to source on a board where sources pay to be there. Gk just has a sense of humor.
Craziest reason ever. It could be that he got banned for posting pics of gear not sold by any of the sponsors there so mods got miffed.
 
Bullshit. Your post wasn't that of an unbiased moderator, it was vindictive and childish. And it had nothing to do with Brutus' statements about Karius. It was because Brutus was arguing with that sexual deviant, ItalianMuscle and you were protecting your buddy.

You succeeded in making Regular look like a liar, though. Reg gave Brutus and Johnny his assurances that they could leave a negative review at AB without fear retaliation or of being banned. Too bad Regular refused to intervene. It proved his assurances were bullshit all along.

I was under the impression that it was Brutus who was a sexual predator and IM was the accuser. That wasn't my reason for banning him but then again I don't have to explain myself here.
 
It may seem that was but oftentimes people who post pics of large stash try to sell through PM syatem. Not good... either scammer or LE.
I never tried to sell anything I attempted to see the route of adding to your sources and never got a answer....
 
Jolter the problem is the lab you were trying to push had no idea you were calling your self their rep. And you got banned at SF for the same reason. Stay out of big people Conversation. You are in no way or shape helping anyone. You are the worst troll I ever encountered, you believe your own bullshit
 
You guys(especially you CBS), have no idea how AB is ran at all. K or Admin never step in and tell us or ask us to do anything. It's never been that way, and never will be. I've been a member of AB since the very beginning, so I DO know how it's ran. There is absolutely no influence from K or Admin in the decisions us mods make.

You're assessment of AB couldn't be further from the truth and is pure speculation. You think you know everything about AB, because someone told you so? He doesn't know shit about AB, so your source is not credible.

Brutus did not get banned for simply just leaving a review. Get real. You know that is not true. You guys made some very bold claims, that came back to be complete bullshit. Who was doing your testing? Oh yeah, Dr. Jim. lol. Didn't his tests get exposed as BS?

You can clearly see if you look through sponsor threads over there, that plenty of people leave reviews, negative and positive without being edited or that person getting banned.

I actually pride myself in hardly ever banning anyone. I personally don't think it's the best solution most of the time.
 
Back
Top