Not sure where letro was designed to be ran as a method to remove PG, considering it's most common and "intended" use is hormone positive breast cancer in women. As is every AI/Serm used in this fashion.
See that's the hypocrisy of the "harm reduction" aspect. That itself is a strange mindset considering the basis. Also Ironically using the term, castration. Lol. Because you're chemically castrating yourself on AAS, in a sense. Destroy natural test, suppress sperm/semen, etc. Still got your nuts but they ain't doin much without HCG or Gonadorelin. Increased risk of hereditary prostate cancer, all sorts of fun stuff. Harm reduction yet proponents of using off market chemicals (you have no idea what's in it or how pure or sterile it is). So it's a bit hypocritical per se in terms of being against using proven pharmaceutical grade medication for an intended use. All this carry risks. Guys will use tren (not even designed for humans originally), full well knowing it's side effects, but then make a claim for how bad some AIs are, which, guess, you wouldn't be taking if you didn't risk the sides in the first place of the drugs that caused you to need a potent Ai/Serm. Short stints of drugs like letro, is a form of harm reduction. As is using any AI/Serm. Not sure where I mentioned, blast 2-3mg daily (ironically the dosage for the women with breast cancer) for a year, or anything along the lines of that, that would be overkill and not worth it at that point in avoiding surgery. I suggested it be "looked into".
For a surgical mammaplasty You'll have to come off any cycle or cruise you're on, go real low dose if you actually have TRT script, get put on an AI anyway, deal with recovery, scarring, muscle tissue missing if it's real bad, etc. Going to tank your hormone levels as it is. It's not about the few grand in cash lol. So yes in a sense, giving it a shot depending on how advanced the gynecomastia is, "could" be worth looking into. Typically if you've had it for longer than 2 years they won't suggest chemical methods anyway.
I'm not saying you're wrong. All drugs carry risks. It always seems that the disagreements tend to bear the most useful fruit for people to make decisions with. Appreciate the neutral response you gave earlier.