Broskie
Member
I'd ask how long you've had it and how bad it is to try and be more helpful but I get the sense suggesting protocols and medications to reduce existing gynecomastia isn't falling in line with "harm reduction".
My guy what are you smoking? Where have I ever said anything against the use of any other AI or SERM? I even suggested myself you can take letro or aromasin for a day or two and swap over to a SERM for aas induced gyno symptoms.
Stop reading my bash on LETRO as if I was condeming anyone taking any AI or SERM.
If you feel compelled to start taking a SERM or AI for ANY type of gyno, which is perfectly fine since you are seeking to actually treat something medically, all im saying is to avoid LETRO when other compounds can provide the same benefits without cleaning out your entire system of your estrogens and their derivatives.
You understand estrogen plays many roles in the male body's physiology other than to grow your breasts right?
It's just common sense if NOTHING else that if you essentially remove the entire essence of estrogen, you're going to starve your breast tissue ALONG WITH EVERY OTHER TISSUE IN THE BODY THAT ULTILIZES ESTROGEN and should be a compound taken in desperation, not willy nilly. And absolutely not for pubertal gyno where you need to stay on for longer periods of time to do your "course".
SERMs can work for pubertal gyno to some extent and are also much healthier than an AI for that use case.
This entire conversation is regarding LETRO. I started by advising against LETRO both short and long term use. I have not told anyone to avoid anything else but LETRO.
I don't like LETRO as an AI in regards to health when healthier alternatives exist.
Stop reading my bash on LETRO as if I was condeming anyone taking any AI or SERM.
Have I said LETRO enough?
Last edited: