Labmax test results

it is not supposed to look like this go to labmax site and compare the pictures

it is supposed to be nice orange under normal light

I see some residue on the bottom, some black shit

I would not touch it
 
Does anyone know if the labmax test kit will be able to test proviron in the future?
I have had bad luck getting proviron worth sending to them for testing. If you have some you think is legit, they will probably MS it for free so they can publish labmax results.
 
Clearly the test cyp is test cyp but I am thinking the pro is actually TEST E, let me know what you guys think
cyp 2.jpg

CYP 1.jpg

pro 1.jpg
pro 2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20140905_234430.jpg
    20140905_234430.jpg
    81.2 KB · Views: 54
Clearly the test cyp is test cyp but I am thinking the pro is actually TEST E, let me know what you guys think
View attachment 16351

View attachment 16350

View attachment 16352
View attachment 16353
The raws alone are easly distinguishable between Test P and Test E. we'd be able to tell the difference just by texture and smell alone. Not knocking the labmax it's been good sometimes but the raw alone is just a give away. Test E clumps especially with it being summer, Test p doesn't it stays fine or coarse and doesn't smell where test e smells very sweet. I know wierd but its habbit to smell the raw. Test e is one of the only raws that would be easy to spot for any brewer with history. And if it had a pink top its Prop Green is TE
 
Out of ten test pro from you this is the only one that didn't color right. But when I test I put every result out there. Usually I run it twice but I wanted flenser to give his opinion also. I was mainly going for the cyp from Bio because I have tested the pro three times from the same batch and no problems.

And also Astro it is why I asked second opinions as the spectrum of colors is hard to tell on some of the test.




The raws alone are easly distinguishable between Test P and Test E. we'd be able to tell the difference just by texture and smell alone. Not knocking the labmax it's been good sometimes but the raw alone is just a give away. Test E clumps especially with it being summer, Test p doesn't it stays fine or coarse and doesn't smell where test e smells very sweet. I know wierd but its habbit to smell the raw. Test e is one of the only raws that would be easy to spot for any brewer with history. And if it had a pink top its Prop Green is TE
 
Last edited:
The UV color was correct and dead on but the side by side I couldn't tell. Thank you as I remember fumbling the A vial and focusing on it while trying to situate for the photo lol.

You have to be quick and watch the initial color change of prop closely. It changes to a dark color which is similar to test e rather quickly.
 
This is the A test only. Notice in the labmax video how the color is darker than the B test. I tested these because I have them so don't give me any flak about the lab. Results are good for Bio Primo.
View attachment 12959

Next up is Test B for Geneza Primo which is good:
View attachment 12960 View attachment 12961

And now Test B from Astro which is good:
View attachment 12964 View attachment 12966

Feel free to discuss and tear apart my opinions. Keep in mind my camera and the lighting aren't very good. The two UV lights don't show that well but they are clearly good when seen in person.

Sorry for the reply to such an old post. I had the exact same results with the GP Primo and was suspect of the results. My B sample looked exacly like Gunrunner's, which looks light orangish-yellow, the A sample was predominately yellow with a hint of green. The B sample under the UV light was tough to tell - had hints of yellow/orange/light green. I didn't think it passed because the A and B samples are supposed to be dark orange-brown - after repeated tests, I was unable to get any result that remotely resembled dark orange-brown. I contacted Naps-Support via pm and he promptly replied that the difference in color could be due to the MCT oil that is used in the manufacture of the Primo. What do you guys think? I'd love for Gunrunner to be correct as this stuff wasn't cheap.
 
Post some pictures, the color does not have to be 100% exact, the way you hold the UV light, surrounding light etc. so it might look a little different.

Under UV is most important, from you description I would say pass.

orangish-yellow is almost pass

it is explained on labmax site if you drop more then the color will be darker orange - brown

but under UV really matters most.
 
Take a look at the attached pics of the GP Primo referenced in a previous tread. I know the pics aren't great - but they were only for my reference and I hadn't planned to post them. The A sample is on the left and the B sample is on the right. To my eye, the A vial is yellowish-green and the B vial is light orange. Under the UV, it was a mix of yellow/green/orange with blue/purple scenting. The colors in the photos are true to what they looked like in person. What do you all think?

Primo1 - Copy.jpg Primo2 - Copy.jpg

Post some pictures, the color does not have to be 100% exact, the way you hold the UV light, surrounding light etc. so it might look a little different.

Under UV is most important, from you description I would say pass.

orangish-yellow is almost pass

it is explained on labmax site if you drop more then the color will be darker orange - brown

but under UV really matters most.
 
What UV light do you use, 365 nm ?

It does not look right, the substance in vial A looks like some jelly, which is definitely not right.

My guess would be that it is test prop but under UV it is yellow not blue - greenish, so it is not pure test prop. You can also eliminate bold from the list.

I am not sure if there is any fluorescence on that picture hard to see. If there is fluorescence it looks to me that there is a lot of shit mixed together.
 
I used the UV light supplied with the Labmax test. I think the "jelly" appearance in vial A is mostly due to some of the substance on the vial walls creating an optical effect. I don't recall it being gelatinous.

It's definitely not bold as I have tested that before and it produces a very distinct color.

It does seem like there is a mixture of something. Under the UV light, there were clumps of blue/purple fluorescence that floated to the top and sides of the vial, with a light greenish-yellow liquid collecting at the bottom that takes on a a light orange-ish tinge with time.

I've tested several times and keep getting the same results whether using 1, 2, or 4 drops, so this is not a concentration issue. I have tested many other substances successfully and this one has me stumped. I have almost a grand into 10 vials, so needless to say - I'm concerned.

I could burn another test and try to get better pictures, but at this point - I'm afraid it would be a waste of time and $.

What UV light do you use, 365 nm ?

It does not look right, the substance in vial A looks like some jelly, which is definitely not right.

My guess would be that it is test prop but under UV it is yellow not blue - greenish, so it is not pure test prop. You can also eliminate bold from the list.

I am not sure if there is any fluorescence on that picture hard to see. If there is fluorescence it looks to me that there is a lot of shit mixed together.
 
Back
Top