Labmax test results

When I do UV light I do under day light and I watch it also in washroom in complete darkness to get better idea.

I do not see point wasting test vials, just look for another primo. This is some shit you have. There still might be same primo inside mixed with other steroids, this is why it looks under UV like some shit.

If you have access to GC/MS they would show you all inside but it is not definitely primo so no point to pay for GC/MS anyway to find out what you have inside, you already know that some shit.
 
NPP testing

Guys -

I've been trying to test NPP, and I'm having difficulty interpreting the results.

According to the labmax chart, NPPs reaction to vial A should be "nil". The liquid in vial A before testing looks like a minty green to me. Every alleged NPP I've added to vial A (I've tried 3 different ones) has turned it brown or red or some combo of brown and red. But wouldn't I expect an oil with color to turn a minty green vial more brownish? Some cells in that chart explicitly say "no color change" while others say "nil" - so what exactly do they mean by nil?

As for vial B, for a few seconds after adding the drop, it does appear to be a yellowish-orange (which is how it should appear), but within 10 seconds it's orange. And after a minute, it's brownish orange. How do I interpret that? Does that "pass" the vial B test for NPP?

Swishing vial B around makes the sides flouresce green under the light in all three tests.

So what I end up with is every test I've run, after a minute or so, ends up looking like nandrolone decanoate, not NPP.

I've only looked at the compiled results that are posted here occasionally and I don't see any NPP test results there, was hoping someone could help me out.

This is exactly what I experienced with my 3 brands of NPP.
I had the same colors like jose_chung (compare also: https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/labmax-test-results.134347835/page-67#post-1003600)

I think this means just that we added to less off NPP. I just got the greenish color when I threw in more NPP. See https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/dragon-pharma-npp-labmax-2014-11-by-enigma.134359935/
 
Anyone aware of a coupon code for labmax?

I was trying to find a coupon code today, through the Google Machine, and came across other inquisitive minds looking for the answer waaaay back when I was still in diapers....

Looks like you hit up the site but no savings on the kit, just random single testing tubes...I'm not mentally able to justify $280 yet...

Anyone else stike gold with a promo code???

I luv me some bargain shopping...
 
I was trying to find a coupon code today, through the Google Machine, and came across other inquisitive minds looking for the answer waaaay back when I was still in diapers....

Looks like you hit up the site but no savings on the kit, just random single testing tubes...I'm not mentally able to justify $280 yet...

Anyone else stike gold with a promo code???

I luv me some bargain shopping...
Haven't seen one yet. People should stop paying full price and they might cut us a break. ;)
 
Whats the problem ? Just buy what you need . I paid $19 a piece for each test . 3 test + $30 UV light + shipping was $89 .......~Ogh

I hear you OGH, I just need a bit more than 3 tests... But after I read your post I'll probably just go with the mass refill deal and buy the light... Thanks for the idea, my brain is very much all or none... Bad habit...
 
I picked up a light off ebay....8.50
battery and charger for it ...7.11

So if your not in a hurry the light can be had for 1/2 the price with free shipping from China. Not a ton of savings buy hey every dollar!
 
I picked up a light off ebay....8.50
battery and charger for it ...7.11

So if your not in a hurry the light can be had for 1/2 the price with free shipping from China. Not a ton of savings buy hey every dollar!

I have been looking around to find out what is going on.

The light you get on ebay is not 365 nm but 395 nm, this is why it is so cheap.

They say something 365 - 405 nm UV light, in fact it is cheap shit 395 or over.

395 nm will not show you all the colors.

365 nm is expensive.

if they say it is 365 nm they lie.
 
What purity does a sample have to have
in order to show the correct colors,
and will it show correct colors for one product
if another product is also present?
 
This is the one I grabbed. How do you happen to know that it is not the right wavelength?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/3W-LED-UV-flashlight-WF-501b-ultraviolet-lamp-365nm-Purple-light-WLF13-/271638231539?pt=US_Flashlights&hash=item3f3ee679f3

it says 365nm....
 
This is the one I grabbed. How do you happen to know that it is not the right wavelength?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/3W-LED-UV-flashlight-WF-501b-ultraviolet-lamp-365nm-Purple-light-WLF13-/271638231539?pt=US_Flashlights&hash=item3f3ee679f3

it says 365nm....

it is misadvertised by the seller it is in fact 395 nm, this is why so cheap.

do not believe in everything on ebay.
 
Code:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/365nm-UV-light-LED-woods-lamp-keychain-flashlight-/161349547542?pt=US_LED_Light_Key_Chains&hash=item25912eb616
 
not doubting you ebola but how is it you know this? Are you involved in lighting spectrums in any way?

If Labmax is selling the lights for 29.00 and they are simply a reseller and are charging a markup as well...then the lights they have must be not 365nm either as they must be buying them very cheaply too
 
Based ON HPLC absorbance DATA essentially all known AAS absorb UVL at wave lengths approximating 210 and 240 nm.

However Tren with it's exclusive THREE polycyclic double bonds also absorb UVL in the 340 SPECTRA.

The answer to MW question is VERY important because the presence of contaminants can remarkably alter the absorbance of "pure substances" and that is WHY HPLC is so useful, because the very process of HPLC involves SEPARATING mixtures into "pure" individual samples which may then be further analyzed to identify the INDIVIDUAL components of a sample mixture.

This distinction is HUGE bc once this separation is achieved the UV spectra of each compound may be determined when compared to a "pure" standard.

Find a "match" for the standard and the "unknown/s" can now be identified.

Obviously it's not that easy bc EVERY substance has it's own absorbance spectra and some have several such as AAS. So you need to have a reasonable idea of what your looking for, otherwise HPLC becomes a crap shoot itself.

Of course the process is simplified considerably if what your searching for is a class of substances such as AAS with readily available "pure" RESEARCH STANDARDS.
 
Last edited:
Flenser....I tried taking some pics of the labmax flourescing (sp) but I think the flash on the camera was lighting up so much you could not see the true color under the UV. Any hints on taking the pics to accurately show the color?
 
not doubting you ebola but how is it you know this? Are you involved in lighting spectrums in any way?

If Labmax is selling the lights for 29.00 and they are simply a reseller and are charging a markup as well...then the lights they have must be not 365nm either as they must be buying them very cheaply too

I have used UV lights before for detecting fake documents, notes, blood stains etc. and there is a big difference when you use real 365 nm and 395 nm or 405 nm. I have UV lights, I have 365 nm (for which I paid a lot) and 395 which are cheaper.

395 nm and over will not show you all colors on the money for example. 395 nm and over works to some degree only but you will not see all patterns on money etc.
 
Flenser....I tried taking some pics of the labmax flourescing (sp) but I think the flash on the camera was lighting up so much you could not see the true color under the UV. Any hints on taking the pics to accurately show the color?
You need to turn off the flash - and the lights - to get the UV color.
 
Back
Top