Labmax test results

[fit2beking]

I strongly suspect those UGLs which are GTG will be supportive of these endeavors those whom are selling BUNK NOT! It seems we have already seen that happen with the AMA lab posting their preference the essence of which is; "hey dudes what ya posting this for man ya know I'm just a PM away", LMAO!

I will try to obtain some more details on the analytical test specifics thru LM.

Guys also remember these tests, presumably, are ONLY searching for the presence of a particular AAS yet at an UNKNOWN concentration, and chances are the required concentration for a POSITIVE STUDY IS LOW.

Ergo, if indeed an AAS test result is negative (no color change) that lab is selling PURE BUNK, IMO!

What would that mean to me? I would NOT trust ANY of that labs products, period!!!

Why you ask? If you really need an answer to that question, perhaps you should start another thread, lol!

Jim

^^^ This is golden! :notworthy:

 

[Dr JIM]

Goodness pardon that iPhone generated verbiage.

That first sentence should read: Do I suspect those UGLs which are selling BUNK and have already "earned" that "negative study" crucible to be supportive of these assays and those whom are performing them, NOT. We have already ......

 

[fit2beking]

Goodness pardon that iPhone generated verbiage.

That first sentence should read: Do I suspect those UGLs which are selling BUNK and have already "earned" that "negative study" crucible to be supportive of these assays and those whom are performing them, NOT. We have already ......

Yep, I believe you addressed the AMA rep earlier on...The funny thing Doc is he hasn't been back. I wonder why? [)]

 

[flenser]

I did think about PMing that AMA rep and asking him to replace the 50ml of fake mast p he sold me. But even if he came through, I don't think I would risk using whatever showed up in the mail.

 

[fit2beking]

I did think about PMing that AMA rep and asking him to replace the 50ml of fake mast p he sold me. But even if he came through, I don't think I would risk using whatever showed up in the mail.

Nope dont do it. You have to let this go under the bridge like water. Im sure he wont be back though after that lashing he received.

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

I did think about PMing that AMA rep and asking him to replace the 50ml of fake mast p he sold me. But even if he came through, I don't think I would risk using whatever showed up in the mail.

Nope dont do it. You have to let this go under the bridge like water. Im sure he wont be back though after that lashing he received.

What thread is this in? I must have missed this AMA thing because I've never heard of him.

 

[fit2beking]

What thread is this in? I must have missed this AMA thing because I've never heard of him.

It was post #395 on see doc's post #400.

Edit- look at Gunnrunner's post 396 also.

 

[Gunrunner]

What thread is this in? I must have missed this AMA thing because I've never heard of him.

Post #112 on this thread. He only waited too long for taking the pic, but got the results.

AMA Mast P - fail

I waited too long with this one as well, but it started out red and just got darker. I didn't waste a test b vial, since AMA is closed and I'm the only one I know who has any.

 

[Raider72]

Dumb question - How much product is needed to run a test?

 

[Zaphod]

Very little...as I have learned Haha

 

[Gunrunner]

Dumb question - How much product is needed to run a test?

A couple drops or a very little powder like a small chip off the tablet and then crunch it to powder. You can go to the Labmax website and watch their videos to get a better idea.

 

[flenser]

I was surfing some of the other boards earlier and came across an apology thread from a member for, get this, posting the test results from Meso showing Sx var and AMA mast are not what they claim. Sx and AMA reps actually made I-forgive-you posts as if they had been planning to refuse his business. Numerous members agreed with them and told the apologizer he was doing the right thing. If that ever happens here on Meso, I think I will go back to being a natty.

 

[fit2beking]

I was surfing some of the other boards earlier and came across an apology thread from a member for, get this, posting the test results from Meso showing Sx var and AMA mast are not what they claim. Sx and AMA reps actually made I-forgive-you posts as if they had been planning to refuse his business. Numerous members agreed with them and told the apologizer he was doing the right thing. If that ever happens here on Meso, I think I will go back to being a natty.

I with you on this flenser!

 

[Mike Oxbig]

I was surfing some of the other boards earlier and came across an apology thread from a member for, get this, posting the test results from Meso showing Sx var and AMA mast are not what they claim. Sx and AMA reps actually made I-forgive-you posts as if they had been planning to refuse his business. Numerous members agreed with them and told the apologizer he was doing the right thing. If that ever happens here on Meso, I think I will go back to being a natty.

Link?

 

[jets]

I called them out on IML when someone asked how good SX var was. I posted a link to meso to one of the labmax threads and they were saying its a fake test. I definitely ruffled a lot of feathers on that site lol. I don't even go on those forums anymore to help people out, if they can't research and realize all those sponsors are garbage and selling vegie oil, they deserve to waste their money. I'm pretty sure that thread I was in got deleted too..what else in new on those sites

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

I was surfing some of the other boards earlier and came across an apology thread from a member for, get this, posting the test results from Meso showing Sx var and AMA mast are not what they claim. Sx and AMA reps actually made I-forgive-you posts as if they had been planning to refuse his business. Numerous members agreed with them and told the apologizer he was doing the right thing. If that ever happens here on Meso, I think I will go back to being a natty.

I've noticed this on a few forums too. It's funny watching the AMA and SF reps, along with the mods, twisting themselves into pretzels to discredit the tests.

Heavyiron is a member here and could easily have looked into this thread (if he hasn't already) but instead, he chose to protect his advertising sources by posting this bullshit response, along with the requisite threats of the ban hammer:

AMA mast p- FAIL? - Page 7
I don't see any evidence. I see a random post with no pictures, video or any evidence at all. Please do not post this without clear and convincing evidence. This is a board rule violation and may result in your account being closed.

Thanks​

And then he closed the thread, ensuring nobody will be able to confirm the validity of the tests once they're verified as legit. Once again, we see the reputations of the *supposed* veterans in this community, and in particular, those on censored boards, for what they really are - all about those ad dollars.

Have I ever mentioned how much I hate censored boards? What a joke they are!

AMA mast p- FAIL? - Page 9
1. No advertiser bashing or flaming allowed at any time.

2. No lab results posted without a copy of the labs, protocol used and a current picture of the product.

3. If your results are sub standard respectfully contact the advertiser FIRST before posting.

4. No trolling, flaming or insults.

Thread closed​

 

[jets]

These guys are just too much...[)]

http://anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/16458-Deez-Nutz-Sale%21%21%21

 

[Mike Oxbig]

I just read through the entire thread at ASF. Jesus Christ, talk about a circle jerk.

 

[Dr JIM]

A Meso member apologized on ANOTHER FORUM for presumably uncovering the manufacturer of BUNK gear and posting the results.

That makes NO SENSE and I would ask that you contact said "member" to ensure the "apology" is legit.

Otherwise the remorseful epiphany on behalf of our Meso mate sounds like concocted garbage much like Sciroxx and AMAs gear!

FYI
It seems ironic I've had three unidentified third party purveyors of truth question the validity of the LM tests as reported on Meso.

ALL THREE contend LM is some company based in "Europe", is of dubious distinction, must not be trusted, and "need my help" clarifying what tests of this nature are useful for?

NOTHING they contend, except perhaps at best, the ability to identify a substances with a STEROL backbone and NO MORE)

Now what are the chances these "concerned citizens" are legitimately troubled by the presence of a few "unverified" tests on the net ? (rather than being shills for a "poor performer" with a vested interest in the results themselves)?

ABSOLUTELY ZIPPO!!!!!


Jim

 

[Dr JIM]

Well CBS I was replying to Flesners comments while you posted yours.

Nonetheless statements made by those with a direct or indirect relationship or vested interest to a particular lab are not worth the ink required to post them, and since the age of the net arrived years ago and no ink is required well ..... you get the idea,

Now of course in a pure world everything would be perfect and every lab would deliver products of undeniable quality and in a timely manner, yea DREAM ON!

But I've often wondered where in the hell does this notion come from, we the consumer have the burden of proof rather than the lab itself.

BUT yea since most mates have limited resources let's propagate and standardize similar criteria which establish self serving rules designed to protect the MANUFACTURER.

Thereafter I/WE will proclaim ALL AAS distributed by MY/OUR UNDERGROUND LAB GTG and anyone who makes statements to the contrary will be banished from MY/OUR FORUM or any other board where MY/OUR company advertises, cool!

Gotta love this overlooked yet institutionalized SCAM!

NOW THATS ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT, and that's not just my opinion it's how the REAL pharmaceutical world operates. (Not that I'm some "Big Pharm" supporter)

Yep the drug companies must first prove (within a reasonable doubt) the medication is GTG and not the consumer, a duh, Gomer!

Why crap even the suggestion an experimental form of consumer "means analysis" could or should be substituted for the existing mechanism is ludicrous.

However, we ALL know that's precisely what is occurring whenever an UGL AAS is being used by our bro's!

So rather than refuting some negative result posted on Meso, I would welcome (hope u don't mind M) ANY UGL to post their confirmatory video (although there is NO SUCH THING, PERIOD!!!).

Personally I don't believe it's an unreasonable request because it's IDENTICAL to the standard propped by some forums, and is one of several lame "rules" often used by "advertisers" to protect a vested interest, their wallet, PERIOD!

Utterly PATHETIC!

Regards
Jim