Labmax test results

It is interesting and I honestly don't have an explanation for it. Should I assume the rest of the prop I have from him (all received in the same shipment) is g2g?

I would hope so, but who knows really. I was sent some test prop for free (all with caps) because the former user couldn't handle the pip it gave him. I'm pretty immune to pip for some reason, so the fact it didn't give me any doesn't say much.

One possibility I don't even want to think about is that I could have mixed up the syringes and used MF prop in both tests. I don't think so, but it's exactly the kind of mistake I would make. I will test it again tomorrow to be sure.
 
One possibility I don't even want to think about is that I could have mixed up the syringes and used MF prop in both tests. I don't think so, but it's exactly the kind of mistake I would make. I will test it again tomorrow to be sure.

Looking forward to your results!!
 
I'm starting to get the feeling you just like to be a pain in the ass..

Nothing wrong with disagreeing with people. Sorry but I couldn't find any proof that they were accurate. But if you don't like what I have to say it's as simple is NOT reading what I post. It's pretty easy actually :)
 
I don't really trust labmax. Can someone show me some proof that it's accurate?
What I have come to is labmax is accurate. The real issue is the kits are made using pharma grade products with exact manufacturing procedures. But they are being used to test ugl product that has changed hands sometimes and could be cut and the ratios of ba and bb as well as the carrier oil comes into play. Lets ask the question based on different ugl recipes so to speak what is the margin for error? What if the ugl's oil were off by not being exactly what the test was made based off of? What if the ugl uses EO how to these things effect colors? Labmax is the best we have and that's why pictures are so important so the guys like Flenser and gun and others that have done lots of them can make an educated decision. But I could be totally wrong?
PS it is our only way to put heat on ugl's and hope they feel it and put heat on the raw source until it gets changed
 
Last edited:
What I have come to is labmax is accurate. The real issue is the kits are made using pharma grade products with exact manufacturing procedures. But they are being used to test ugl product the has changed hands sometimes and could be cut and the ratios of ba and bb as well as the carrier oil comes into play. Lets ask the question based on different ugl recipes so to speak what is the margin for error? What if the ugl's oil were off by not being exactly what the test was made based off of? What if the ugl uses EO how to these things effect colors? Labmax is the best we have and that's why pictures are so important so the guys like Flenser and gun and others that have done lots of them can make an educated decision. But I could be totally wrong?

Good to know. Thanks, I'm going to do more research when I have the time. But I do agree that this is the best option right now. I just want to find real proof on accuracy. I agree always better to be safe than sorry. But my main question is what if labmax makes a mistake? I just have to do more of my own research. Don't want any cry babies complaining about what I post. :)
 
Good to know. Thanks, I'm going to do more research when I have the time. But I do agree that this is the best option right now. I just want to find real proof on accuracy. I agree always better to be safe than sorry. But my main question is what if labmax makes a mistake? I just have to do more of my own research. Don't want any cry babies complaining about what I post. :)
I would point out as Flenser did these test were developed for governments to use and they would not allow them if they didn't work!
 
I've heard that before in the thread. So your telling me the actual labmax kit was developed for goverment use?
Its a field test just like ones for street drugs! LE is not going to use something only to get it thrown out in court cause it was not right.
 
Just because you don't comprehend the science behind it does not mean it's inaccurate.

Lmao. Just because I don't trust something doesn't mean it is inaccurate. I'm just asking if anyone can point me in the direction of some proof. No reason for you to get your panties in a bunch.
 
Lmao. Just because I don't trust something doesn't mean it is inaccurate. I'm just asking if anyone can point me in the direction of some proof. No reason for you to get your panties in a bunch.


It's been pointed out to you already I saw just keep an open mind with science even Doc Jim did a good explanation of how it works.
 
It's been pointed out to you already I saw just keep an open mind with science even Doc Jim did a good explanation of how it works.

Ok I'll go back through and read more. I read at least 70% of this. But I'll look for more. I did ask the question earlier but never got a response or maybe I forgot to follow up who knows. Lol
 
Ok I'll go back through and read more. I read at least 70% of this. But I'll look for more. I did ask the question earlier but never got a response or maybe I forgot to follow up who knows. Lol


I just saw you asked for clarification it's been a long day on mast e so am a little pissed right now since it might be fake.
 
I just saw you asked for clarification it's been a long day on mast e so am a little pissed right now since it might be fake.

It sucks this shit isn't like other drugs. We can't just dip our fingers in and have a taste to see if the shits real. Lol. On another note I am ordering one to test all the product I ordered. Some thing I know are legit and some I'm not sure about. So I'm going to sample it.
 
Back
Top