Labmax test results

The fact is that some of the members have been here for a while and have already proven themselves. So if a respected member like Flens post results but can't or didn't get pics then I trust him. But if some stupid fukin dipshit, who just created an account last month and has no reputable post starts some shit then I just ignore him or flame his retarded ass.

I could count the amount of members I trust on both hands with a couple fingers left over. Other have a long way to go before I trust them. Obviously, some will never be trusted.

That makes sense. But it's not really providing everyone with help. Isn't this forum supposed to help everyone who needs help? So if you trust someone who post something it doesn't mean everyone will. So shouldn't everyone have to follow the same rules just to respect everyone in the forum? Someone I trust may post something I believe but that doesn't mean everyone will. Everyone should have to follow the same rules for the fairness of the entire forum. I highly doubt people will not agree with this.
 
The fact is that some of the members have been here for a while and have already proven themselves. So if a respected member like Flens post results but can't or didn't get pics then I trust him. But if some stupid fukin dipshit, who just created an account last month and has no reputable post starts some shit then I just ignore him or flame his retarded ass.

I could count the amount of members I trust on both hands with a couple fingers left over. Other have a long way to go before I trust them. Obviously, some will never be trusted.

I do recall reading in other threads that some high ranking accounts have been sold to scammer or sources. So how can everyone trust someone because they are told by everyone else that he is reliable. All I'm saying is everyone should follow the same rules.
 
Just got my Labmax kit today and have some interesting results. I have photos to provide proof for everything, just busy with work so I wont be able to deal with those at the moment.

Biologic Tren Ace- Pass
Biologic Tren Enan- Pass
Biologic EQ- Pass
Biologic Mast Enan- No Test for enan but it was not Mast Prop, looked very similar to EQ
Biologic Test Cyp- Pass
Biologic Test Prop- FAIL (was Test Enan)
Biologic Anavar- Pass
GP Deca- FAIL (A/B colors looked right but was bright blue under UV. not green)

I'm not good at uploading photos in this forum, but if someone is willing to upload them please PM me and I'll categorize them all into a dummy drop box folder that I'll send you the link to.
 
Just got my Labmax kit today and have some interesting results. I have photos to provide proof for everything, just busy with work so I wont be able to deal with those at the moment.

Biologic Tren Ace- Pass
Biologic Tren Enan- Pass
Biologic EQ- Pass
Biologic Mast Enan- No Test for enan but it was not Mast Prop, looked very similar to EQ
Biologic Test Cyp- Pass
Biologic Test Prop- FAIL (was Test Enan)
Biologic Anavar- Pass
GP Deca- FAIL (A/B colors looked right but was bright blue under UV. not green)

I guess that explains Bio's infamous "pipless prop." No surprise there.
 
Also explains why I still felt so awesome the first few weeks of pct after finishing off with "test prop". This test was from the same vial I used to end my last cycle.
 
Also explains why I still felt so awesome the first few weeks of pct after finishing off with "test prop". This test was from the same vial I used to end my last cycle.

Yeah, that will totally fuck up your PCT timing:(
 
I want to update the other thread.. is there any definitive tests for Ascendant Labs Deca or Mast E?

We still don't have a test for mast e, unfortunately. AL was game to provide a sample for labmax to GC/MS, but he balked when he learned he had to send it to Canada. If someone has some and wants to send labmax a 1ml sample, PM me.

I am less than optimistic about it, though. AL's bunk prop looked just like Pep's bunk prop indicating they might have gotten their raws from the same supplier. Makes me think AL's mast e will be mast p, the same as Pep.
 
As promised, I tested PEP's Test Prop.

First, I'd like to say that I don't think that little bit of fluorescence in Bkent's test should meet the threshold for proof of Pass/Fail. For instance, I think the florescence should be as pronounced as on the website. But, I don't have much experience with this, so maybe guys like Flenser can weigh in.

This angers me, because I have a good amount of Pep gear on hand.

I don't have before/after pictures, take that for what it's worth, I don't give a fuck. I have one before picture and both vials, A and B, both look brown. It was too hard to see any fluorescence under UV light with Pep's shit, which since I didn't know what to expect from the test, I chose not to take a picture.

I fucked myself, because instead of using the test on a known source (Astro's Test E, which I have bloods to back-up that it's legit), I started with Pep's Test P, and since it was my first time, was initially unsure of how to interpret the results. There was little florescence, but mostly the vial was just brown, both under UV and normal light. There were little flecks of fluorescence, but mostly it was just brown. BTW, I have a rated UV light between 365nm-375nm.

Anyways, I saw LITTLE fluorescence on the Test P, not the glowing vials the website shows. After testing two different Pep Test P vials that came in my shipment, I decided to test Astro's Test E as a control. Astro's Test E displayed the pronounced fluorescence I expected from the test.

In my opinion, though it has hurt me for $400 in Pep Test P and Sustanon, I would have to say that PEP's TEST P was a FAIL. I ordered early January.

Before picture: Both look brown as shit. I use imgur, because it removes EXIF data.

http ://imgur.com/sYAPau7

Did you use 365 nm UV light here?
 
As promised, I tested PEP's Test Prop.

First, I'd like to say that I don't think that little bit of fluorescence in Bkent's test should meet the threshold for proof of Pass/Fail. For instance, I think the florescence should be as pronounced as on the website. But, I don't have much experience with this, so maybe guys like Flenser can weigh in.

This angers me, because I have a good amount of Pep gear on hand.


Before picture: Both look brown as shit. I use imgur, because it removes EXIF data.

http ://imgur.com/sYAPau7

While the fluorescence definitely wasn't like the video, It was there in hand. It was glowing on the sides of the vial, but the gear itself definitely did not glow.

The only reason the picture is at a weird angle is because of the hand placement..I'll have another person handy to take pictures the next time I test something. But it was definitely a pass.

Not only because of the Labmax, but because it elevated my own test levels, so I knew the gear had Test E. The dosage however is another story, but we all know this is where the Labmax platform falls short.
 
The dosage however is another story, but we all know this is where the Labmax platform falls short.

you do not know how to use the test, if all colors match then you have good pharma quality, well you are not sure about the potency you simply adjust the dosage untill you feel.

you pay $200 for the test kit, which gives you a lot of tests and you expect the same results like from GC/MS which cost over $300 or more per single test.
 
you do not know how to use the test, if all colors match then you have good pharma quality, well you are not sure about the potency you simply adjust the dosage untill you feel.

you pay $200 for the test kit, which gives you a lot of tests and you expect the same results like from GC/MS which cost over $300 or more per single test.

You misunderstood what i wrote. I get that it doesn't and never did test for potency/dosage.
 
We still don't have a test for mast e, unfortunately. AL was game to provide a sample for labmax to GC/MS, but he balked when he learned he had to send it to Canada. If someone has some and wants to send labmax a 1ml sample, PM me.

I am less than optimistic about it, though. AL's bunk prop looked just like Pep's bunk prop indicating they might have gotten their raws from the same supplier. Makes me think AL's mast e will be mast p, the same as Pep.

Hmm, I wonder how AL's deca is then.
 
These tests are QUALITATIVE vs. QUANTITATIVE.

Fancy words for: "what” vs ”how much".

Great for telling you that the Deca you bought is actually Test but not useful to tell you that your 250mg/ml Test is dosed correctly.

It absolutely not going to tell you that your gear is "pharma grade".

Even GC/MS cannot do that.

Pharma grade means that all ingredients meet (in the USA) the applicable USP or NF standards and the final injectable was manufactured according to cGMP and also meets the appropriate USP standards. I've attached the USP32 standards for Test E.

LABMAX tests are a great achievement, but they were designed by M.M.C. International B.V. to be presumptive tests (presumably for law enforcement) for the presence of a named controlled anabolic. They are NOT an analytical test.

Walt

PS: For the disbelievers... M.M.C. Store - Products - Steroid Substance Identification Refill Kit



you do not know how to use the test, if all colors match then you have good pharma quality, well you are not sure about the potency you simply adjust the dosage untill you feel.

you pay $200 for the test kit, which gives you a lot of tests and you expect the same results like from GC/MS which cost over $300 or more per single test.
 

Attachments

you are just another one who does not understand the test, it took me a while to figue out so I do not blame you too for low inteligence.

labmax will detect the presence of steroid and if you have good quality it will shaw all the right colors so you know that you have good gear

the other problem is potency, well you just adjust dosage untill you feel, it is simple like that
 
Back
Top