sorry if I missed it but has anyone tested tbol or anavar that's legit? if so what ugl was it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is patently false and I am only replying to this because you are so vociferously admonishing others.
The Labmax tests are precise enough to detect .3mg... so, if there is essentially ANY hormone in your oil, you'll get a color representative of that steroid, to varying degrees.
So, in your 10ml vial of what you think is Test P, assuming that there is about 30 drops to a milliliter and you only use 1 drop per steroid test, you could have 90mg in the entire fucking vial and still have a color representative of the hormone.
30 drops/ml x 0.3mg/drop x 10 ml/vial = 90 mg per 10ml.
So, yes, theoretically, you could push 10 times the normal volume into yourself, or 1 vial per pinning session, and get results... but, it wouldn't be pretty.
Has anyone noticed tren a and tren e have essentially the same labmax results? Was plannng on switching to tren e from a, but if it's tren a in the e vial I won't know it until the night sweats go away... 3 weeks and 6 pins later.
If you've accidentally been pinning 200+mg of tren ace thinking its tren e, you'd definitely be able to tell. Pinning that much tren ace at once would hit you like a truck. I had the same concern but the 2 compounds kick in so differently I think it's pretty easy to tell them apart unless you're a freak of nature and 200mg of tren ace doesn't do anything to you. Even if it's actually 100mg/ml of tren ace, pinning it e3d would cause some funky side effects.
Damn flenser you got them on speed dial??? [)]Labmax just confirmed the tren a and e tests are indistinguishable, but said they are working on a fix.
He mentioned using the clen test with tren. Tren a is more green and tren e is more yellow, but you would have to set them next to each other to see the difference.
Damn flenser you got them on speed dial??? [)]
Did a labmax test on a recent batch of MFL test c. At the same time I tested prescription grade watson test c. Didn't see any significant difference between the two samples.
Is the fluorescence test considered more accurate than a color check under normal white light conditions? Seems like unless I have a known good sample to compare to, that it could be hard to tell exactly what color you have, based on the fact that many of the labmax samples state color requirements that are not significantly different from one another. I kept my samples overnight and noticed that the fluorescence color was virtually identical between the 2 samples, so I assume the fluorescent test is more forgiving - is that right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVTBZCqvDoY&feature=youtu.be
I like to go by the pics and videos on the labmax site when they are available. The color chart is just enough information to be confusing IMO. The test c video is here:
Code:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVTBZCqvDoY&feature=youtu.be
The UV result is the most important IMO. Unfortunately, it's also the most difficult to take pics of.
I also find the color chart kind of confusing to based on the similar colors between so many samples and I also don't know how to necessarily tell if my computer display colors of the shown samples are exactly matching the real colors. The side by side comparison with the known good sample did give me confidence in the results.
Any body test pharma grade, galenika test e. to seeif it is legit or fake
Does attaching photos directly from tapatalk work on here? Want to know before so I don't post a bunch of dead attachments.