Labmax test results

This is patently false and I am only replying to this because you are so vociferously admonishing others.

The Labmax tests are precise enough to detect .3mg... so, if there is essentially ANY hormone in your oil, you'll get a color representative of that steroid, to varying degrees.

So, in your 10ml vial of what you think is Test P, assuming that there is about 30 drops to a milliliter and you only use 1 drop per steroid test, you could have 90mg in the entire fucking vial and still have a color representative of the hormone.

30 drops/ml x 0.3mg/drop x 10 ml/vial = 90 mg per 10ml.

So, yes, theoretically, you could push 10 times the normal volume into yourself, or 1 vial per pinning session, and get results... but, it wouldn't be pretty.

we can argue for a long time but you guys pay $200 for a kit with a lot of test vials to last you a year or longer and you expect to have analysis like from GC/MS which cost over $300 just for a single test.

I have been using the test kit and it is the best tool for the price to check your gear. It worked perfect for me so far and no more bunk gear.
 
Another test from a member at OLM posted today. Tested Gear's 365 var which is called pharmatech. Said it tested to be var and posted pictures as well.
 
Has anyone noticed tren a and tren e have essentially the same labmax results? Was plannng on switching to tren e from a, but if it's tren a in the e vial I won't know it until the night sweats go away... 3 weeks and 6 pins later.
 
Has anyone noticed tren a and tren e have essentially the same labmax results? Was plannng on switching to tren e from a, but if it's tren a in the e vial I won't know it until the night sweats go away... 3 weeks and 6 pins later.


If you've accidentally been pinning 200+mg of tren ace thinking its tren e, you'd definitely be able to tell. Pinning that much tren ace at once would hit you like a truck. I had the same concern but the 2 compounds kick in so differently I think it's pretty easy to tell them apart unless you're a freak of nature and 200mg of tren ace doesn't do anything to you. Even if it's actually 100mg/ml of tren ace, pinning it e3d would cause some funky side effects.
 
Last edited:
If you've accidentally been pinning 200+mg of tren ace thinking its tren e, you'd definitely be able to tell. Pinning that much tren ace at once would hit you like a truck. I had the same concern but the 2 compounds kick in so differently I think it's pretty easy to tell them apart unless you're a freak of nature and 200mg of tren ace doesn't do anything to you. Even if it's actually 100mg/ml of tren ace, pinning it e3d would cause some funky side effects.

Hmm, that should work. Thanks. I'm on a pretty low dose, but can adjust it for a couple of weeks during the switch. If I wake in a pool of sweat, I'll know why.
 
Labmax just confirmed the tren a and e tests are indistinguishable, but said they are working on a fix.

He mentioned using the clen test with tren. Tren a is more green and tren e is more yellow, but you would have to set them next to each other to see the difference.
 
Labmax just confirmed the tren a and e tests are indistinguishable, but said they are working on a fix.

He mentioned using the clen test with tren. Tren a is more green and tren e is more yellow, but you would have to set them next to each other to see the difference.
Damn flenser you got them on speed dial??? [:o)]
 
Did a labmax test on a recent batch of MFL test c. At the same time I tested prescription grade watson test c. Didn't see any significant difference between the two samples.

Is the fluorescence test considered more accurate than a color check under normal white light conditions? Seems like unless I have a known good sample to compare to, that it could be hard to tell exactly what color you have, based on the fact that many of the labmax samples state color requirements that are not significantly different from one another. I kept my samples overnight and noticed that the fluorescence color was virtually identical between the 2 samples, so I assume the fluorescent test is more forgiving - is that right?
 
Did a labmax test on a recent batch of MFL test c. At the same time I tested prescription grade watson test c. Didn't see any significant difference between the two samples.

Is the fluorescence test considered more accurate than a color check under normal white light conditions? Seems like unless I have a known good sample to compare to, that it could be hard to tell exactly what color you have, based on the fact that many of the labmax samples state color requirements that are not significantly different from one another. I kept my samples overnight and noticed that the fluorescence color was virtually identical between the 2 samples, so I assume the fluorescent test is more forgiving - is that right?

I like to go by the pics and videos on the labmax site when they are available. The color chart is just enough information to be confusing IMO. The test c video is here:

Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVTBZCqvDoY&feature=youtu.be

The UV result is the most important IMO. Unfortunately, it's also the most difficult to take pics of.
 
I like to go by the pics and videos on the labmax site when they are available. The color chart is just enough information to be confusing IMO. The test c video is here:

Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVTBZCqvDoY&feature=youtu.be

The UV result is the most important IMO. Unfortunately, it's also the most difficult to take pics of.

I also find the color chart kind of confusing to based on the similar colors between so many samples and I also don't know how to necessarily tell if my computer display colors of the shown samples are exactly matching the real colors. The side by side comparison with the known good sample did give me confidence in the results.
 
I also find the color chart kind of confusing to based on the similar colors between so many samples and I also don't know how to necessarily tell if my computer display colors of the shown samples are exactly matching the real colors. The side by side comparison with the known good sample did give me confidence in the results.

A known good sample is best, yeah. Sort of expensive burning a test kit for something you know will pass, but I did the same thing early on.
 
Probably a stupid question but I see that the tests pick up just about every Testosterone except Test Base powder. Is the test worth getting for this? Any chance it would pick it up?
 
Any body test pharma grade, galenika test e. to seeif it is legit or fake

Yes, tested it back in November and came back good. I have been using the Galenika ICN's as my only test for years and know that they are real not only because of the source but because of bloodwork I get along with bloodwork my friends get as they use it for HRT. So when I first got my kit it was one of the first things I tested because I was skeptical of the labmax kit itself and wanted to test something I knew was real to see if the kit worked like it should, and it did.
 
Does attaching photos directly from tapatalk work on here? Want to know before so I don't post a bunch of dead attachments.
 
Has anyone had any good Test P lately ? Looks like most have failed Labmax. I'm just wondering if everyone's Prop is bad and from the same supplier or if someone's has used some lately that they know for sure is good and properly dosed ?
 
Back
Top