[Labmax] UP NPP 100

dmt31

New Member
2 drops from 27g. According to the labmax site, this is a fail as the colors before UV are off, but I see the bright green under UV light (it was more visible in person) I will call this a pass, but I'm sure others will have their opinion to share. I still have not see someone ever post a labmax on NPP, that they themselves did, in this section, that looks like the labmax site. So either nobody has ever had real NPP, or something like what I have is really what we're looking for as the green is definitely present.

http://imgur.com/v8g7aua,8xjYnps,RO93cUm,S7IlFNk,AzkEKBm
 
it is hard to see, I do not see the greenish color, I had real NPP a while ago and it looked nice greenish

your looks more orange but I am not sure if this is the right color you have there
 
it is hard to see, I do not see the greenish color, I had real NPP a while ago and it looked nice greenish

your looks more orange but I am not sure if this is the right color you have there
It was hard to see, but it was there, hidden in the middle of the oil. I wasn't thrilled with the result, but I'm pretty confident it was a pass. I'd like you to check the Mast P thread, I could use your advice
 
These are things that confuse me. I have ran this NPP for about a year and it has always been fire I can only think of one other source whose NPP stood up to this. Now not to say things cant change. It goes back to labmax again and how accurate is it when the ester changes and not the compound. I like to know what was the first labmax and some research on its consistency testing the same compounds over and over again from the same vial is there subtle differences each time. DMT this has nothing to do with you just thinking openly I and the rest of the forum appreciate the time, money, and effort you have put into this.
 
These are things that confuse me. I have ran this NPP for about a year and it has always been fire I can only think of one other source whose NPP stood up to this. Now not to say things cant change. It goes back to labmax again and how accurate is it when the ester changes and not the compound. I like to know what was the first labmax and some research on its consistency testing the same compounds over and over again from the same vial is there subtle differences each time. DMT this has nothing to do with you just thinking openly I and the rest of the forum appreciate the time, money, and effort you have put into this.
I don't doubt it's fire, and this is a pass to me like I said. No offense taken
 
I don't doubt it's fire, and this is a pass to me like I said. No offense taken
No it's not that I look at your test and then the labmax site just seems I get confused it's not just yours. It has been crossing my mind a bit the last coupe of weeks. Like I said in the other thread I really wish we had better but labmax is it for now.
 
It goes back to labmax again and how accurate is it when the ester changes and not the compound.

this is why you have two vial A and B

it was discussed here many times

the initial color in via A is olive green for NPP and orange for Deca, this is how you use difference with esters.

the same goes from test prop and test enan etc.

you just need to learn the test and you will see that it is very useful and accurate.
 
this is why you have two vial A and B

it was discussed here many times

the initial color in via A is olive green for NPP and orange for Deca, this is how you use difference with esters.

the same goes from test prop and test enan etc.

you just need to learn the test and you will see that it is very useful and accurate.
You know you defending labmax is about the same as sources defending their gear. I am just asking questions openly and like I said in the other thread I am not saying throw it out the window.
 
You know you defending labmax is about the same as sources defending their gear. I am just asking questions openly and like I said in the other thread I am not saying throw it out the window.

i dont believe labmax is good at telling between esters. tren e vs tren a, ive never been able to tell a difference from labmaxes ive seen, even with vial A and B.

"it was discussed here many times"- it was also thought that for awhile glow intensity correlated to concentration/purity and that was proven iffy. just because something is discussed before can we not question the validity?
 
i dont believe labmax is good at telling between esters. tren e vs tren a, ive never been able to tell a difference from labmaxes ive seen, even with vial A and B.

"it was discussed here many times"- it was also thought that for awhile glow intensity correlated to concentration/purity and that was proven iffy. just because something is discussed before can we not question the validity?
Test e aND test c look literally nothing alike in a labmax, that's just one off the top of my head
 
Test e aND test c look literally nothing alike in a labmax, that's just one off the top of my head

good point, i've seen a really good test e (blue) and test c labmax (orange-yellow-greenish). i think jim has mentioned this before, but how are these 2 vials suppose to test over a dozen compounds as well as their esters? just seems a bit far fetched...
 
You know you defending labmax is about the same as sources defending their gear. I am just asking questions openly and like I said in the other thread I am not saying throw it out the window.

it is fact how it works, it was proven here many time I have been using this test for a long time, you simply do not understand the test.

people come here do not have a clue about the test but a lot to say

people pay $5 for test vial and expect it to be HPLC or GC/MS
 
Back
Top