It seems to me, from what I've seen, that labmax is very inconsistent at best. I'm wondering if with
@Millard Baker 's new lab testing program that a sample could be taken from a vial and labmaxed before it's sent to the lab to see if the lab results are consistent with the labmax results. of course by opening the vial that could cause speculation that the vial was tampered with before testing so maybe two vials purchased at the same time. One is lab maxed, one is lab tested.
One could say if the results are inconsistent that even though they were purchased at the same time that they could be from different runs. I think time would show consistency or not. One might say why labmax if we're lab testing. The answer is because Millards lab testing is all about safety and if, in time, this comparison shows that labmax can't be trusted then there are people throwing away good gear because labmax said it was bunk or using potentially bunk gear because their labmax said it was good.
To the contrary, it may show labmax to be a valid form of testing for the presence of hormone. At this point there are alot of people putting their trust in something, that due to many variables, may or may not be trustworthy. We aren't chemists and we only have opinions based on what the labmax test manufacturer is telling us what "their" product does. Isn't that the same thing the ugl labs do. We're using a test that we really don't know for sure works consistently to test a product that we really aren't sure what it is.
I don't know if it's accurate or not...but then again I'm just above idiot.
