colossus25
Member
Guess who's back bitchso instead of defending your pal Analyzer you go on full attack mode to divert attention.
lost all argumentsnothing left
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Laboratory testing of AASs, GH, peptides...
- Thread starter Analyzer
- Start date
Whoremoans
Member
Pretty positive he's a labmax shill @mands i posted something about roidtest a while bad and he PM'd me explaining how they don't work and labmax is the only way to test or whatever. He has an agenda.
colossus25
Member
so instead of defending your pal Analyzer you go on full attack mode to divert attention.
lost all arguments
Let me answer that question... yes he charged members for his little lights and test kit he ordered online. This is just fucking ridiculous at this point and just like @mands said isn't even worth the time.
@mercury let me dumb it down for you since you are too fucking stupid and incoherent to understand what is being said:
NOBODY HERE IS ENDORSING ANYONE WE HAVE OUR OWN QUESTIONS FOR ANALYZER THAT ACTUALLY MAKE SENSE. YOU LOST ALL CREDITABILITY THE MINUTE YOU SAID GC/MS ISN'T SUITABLE FOR TESTING AAS, WHEN IN FACT ALL MAJOR DRUG TESTING ORGANIZATIONS CLAIM IT IS OPTIMAL. YOU DO NOT KNOW THE SCIENCE BEHIND ANY OF THIS IT IS BLATANTLY OBVIOUS AT THIS POINT.
And another thing stop taking my jokes and insults thats just weak you cock juggler.
colossus25
Member
All the most respected members on meso have stepped up and bashed this fool including you. I think our work here is done.
mercury
New Member
Some more facts
1. Mands tells everybody what is he having tested - a pharma (or fake pharma) anadrol and pharma (or fake pharma) primo
2. The dosages of those exact products are literally available everywhere and even if they weren't it's easy to assume standard concentration of primo mg/ml and anadrol pills are wide known
3. So mands sends these to the guy and receives data for anadrol that are pretty much the same as expected (and cannot be verified otherwise) and BAD data for primo (first test showed 86?)
4. Suddenly the expected result of 100 mg/ml is produced with some special method totally different from anadrol?
And at the same time we have attempts to discredit Simec(accredited lab) by Analyzer himself and Jano who has been here for a while and built trust.
1. Mands tells everybody what is he having tested - a pharma (or fake pharma) anadrol and pharma (or fake pharma) primo
2. The dosages of those exact products are literally available everywhere and even if they weren't it's easy to assume standard concentration of primo mg/ml and anadrol pills are wide known
3. So mands sends these to the guy and receives data for anadrol that are pretty much the same as expected (and cannot be verified otherwise) and BAD data for primo (first test showed 86?)
4. Suddenly the expected result of 100 mg/ml is produced with some special method totally different from anadrol?
And at the same time we have attempts to discredit Simec(accredited lab) by Analyzer himself and Jano who has been here for a while and built trust.
mercury
New Member
try
https://chemometec.com/
and nobody will dispute any fake results
https://chemometec.com/
and nobody will dispute any fake results
colossus25
Member
Lol you just keep regurgitating the same exact "points" which are absolutely ridiculous. Bro you're done here, shit you're pretty much done on meso. Nobody is going to listen to shit you have to say and you keep dodging every question we have for you. Your best bet is to just leave meso and go pretend that you know what you're talking about somewhere else. You've been exposed its over go away now....
mercury
New Member
the fact is that this thread was read over 3000 times and idiots like you were ignored except a few trying to push the fake lab testing
colossus25
Member
The irony of you calling me an idiot while every thing you said about gc/ms was proven to be absolutely wrong. And i already told you go and quote where i was apparently pushing this lab you lying sack of shit.
How about you answer the question that you have been asked about 20 times now even though i know the answer.
Did you charge people for a labmax test?
@Analyzer
@Docd187123
Edit: @mands or anyone else who has the background to answer.
To attempt to put this argument to rest I would like to ask for an explanation of "preparative flash chromatography" in order to get the standard that was used for this testing of this primobolan. Is this an accredited practice or just something that works and will give an accurate reading.
I do not claim to have any extensive background in chemistry and really don't care if this is an accredited procedure or not. If it is accurate enough for the intended purpose of this testing we are trying to establish here for Meso, it's good enough for me.
@Docd187123
Edit: @mands or anyone else who has the background to answer.
To attempt to put this argument to rest I would like to ask for an explanation of "preparative flash chromatography" in order to get the standard that was used for this testing of this primobolan. Is this an accredited practice or just something that works and will give an accurate reading.
I do not claim to have any extensive background in chemistry and really don't care if this is an accredited procedure or not. If it is accurate enough for the intended purpose of this testing we are trying to establish here for Meso, it's good enough for me.
Where and when did @Analyzer discredit Simec? You refuse to answer/admit that you have a dog in this fight, though other members know it is the case. You come on here with your ignorant bs attempt to discredit and then are stupid enough to think that your shill account @kunt isn't obviously part of your game. It speaks volumes on your part that you refuse to acknowledge the questions asked probably more than 10 times now and then, to top it all off, have the balls to call other guys in here shills. Fucking pathetic asshole. You must of bumped you head.
sound like mllard thinks its not quiet good
Correction. Millard said nothing about the procedures used. He only stated that it would not (edit)meet AL requirements since the test being performed for the members of Meso will not have public acknowledgement of the lab's information.
colossus25
Member
We spoke about this a few pages back. From the looks of it so far, it is not accredited but rather just a small clandestine operation for the sole purpose of providing us with a reliable testing option. He may have had the standards before hand and there is a possibility that he might not want to share where he obtained them for some sort of security reason (I could be wrong). We are currently waiting on him to provide photographic evidence of the lab and equipment which he is using to test our aas.
Whoremoans
Member
No, he discredits that too, unless it's labmax.
colossus25
Member
mercury
New Member
do not just disoriented at the end of discussion and expect somebody to spend whole day with you explaining over and over again. Just look for and you will find that he stated that Simec is no accredited lat etc.
colossus25
Member
So kunh can type perfect English all of a sudden? lmaoo log back on as mercury already this tactic isn't working.
Hey buddy. I realize the testing will not be accredited. I am interested in the explanation of "preparative flash chromatography" that @Analyzer used to obtain the standard for the primo test.
As I said above. If this procedure is going to be used for all standard samples used for comparison in this testing of our samples, and it is good enough for the purposes of our testing here for Meso members, I don't care if it is an accredited "procedure" or just something that is going to work for our tests.
Similar threads
