Laboratory testing of AASs, GH, peptides...

Let's see what science direct says about GC/MS testing for AAS, shall we Mercury????

Well apparently it is a validated method to test for AAS according to them

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073817301275

Now let's see what the American Association for Clinical Chemistry says:

Oh wait, they use GC/MS to test for AAS for WADA.

Sports Drug Testing Laboratories - AACC.org

Mercury spews bullshit on the regular.
Yes sir almost like masterbater or whatever his handle is. How you doing docd.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 
The Forensic Science International Journal:


  • supplements were counterfeits.


  • Two supplements contained methandrostenolone at therapeutical doses.
The use of counterfeit or substandard medicines can have an important health impact, resulting in therapeutic failure, be toxic or even cause death. Anabolic steroids are a frequent target for counterfeiters worldwide, being the second most frequent counterfeited class in Brazil. The aims of this work were to optimize and validate a GC–MS method for the quantitative determination of anabolic steroids in tablet, aqueous suspension and oil solution forms, and to analyze pharmaceutical products sent to Brazilian Federal Police (BFP) for forensic analysis. Sample preparation included extraction with methanol in ultrasonic bath followed by centrifugation. The method was successfully validated and 345 samples of pharmaceutical products were analyzed (328 medicines and 17 dietary supplements). About 42% of the medicines were counterfeits, 28.7% of tablets, 12.0% of suspensions and 65.2% of oil solutions; 11% were considered substandards. Five dietary supplements contained undeclared anabolic steroids, including two containing methandrostenolone at 5.4 and 5.8 mg/capsule, equivalent to levels found in medicines. The proposed method is suitable for implementation in routine analysis for identification of counterfeits and substandard products. The analytical results show the need to raise awareness of consumers over the risks from the consumption of anabolic steroids from the clandestine market and for more incisive actions from government agencies aiming at decreasing the availability of these products.

http://www.fsijournal.org/article/S0379-0738(17)30127-5/abstract

Mercury attempts to discredit any testing that's not done by labmax. Isn't that fishy to anyone else????
 
So @Millard Baker would you use @Analyzer service to test products for anaboliclab.com

Analyzer already stated that Simec is not accredited to test AAS, I give my thumbs up.

I suggest we also change name from anaboliclab.com to analyzerlab.com

There was also recently this guy from UK, who also discredited Simec to be busted himself later that he does not have any clue in testing.
 
Let's see what science direct says about GC/MS testing for AAS, shall we Mercury????

Well apparently it is a validated method to test for AAS according to them

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073817301275

Now let's see what the American Association for Clinical Chemistry says:

Oh wait, they use GC/MS to test for AAS for WADA.

Sports Drug Testing Laboratories - AACC.org

Mercury spews bullshit on the regular.
Don't waste your time doc obviously he doesn't believe in what every other drug testing organization has to say but yet we're the ignorant ones. You and i both presented plenty of evidence to show how full of shit this ass hat is.
 
Just seen your ai looking yoked bro. He probably bounced he knows what's comming.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Thanks brother lol hopefully he did. He is just a fucking clown with an agenda, i gave him too much credit when i said he knew what he was talking about. Some simple basic research completely debunked all his "knowledge" lmaoo what a hoe nugget.
 
dis is bs

good friday is not evn free day

i searched external standard ..

how cud u USE EXTERNAL STANDARD if u DIDNT have standard on 13TH wen u mailed mands dat its 86mg?!

U SAD U DID MAKE STANDARD THE WEEK AFTER. LOL DOESNT ADD UP XPLAIN DIS
i will respell cautiosly

2./3. I did not have standard of primobolan for the first test, so I used external standard since I wanted at least preliminary result before holidays. I had impure raw primobolan left from previous testings. I purified it using preparative flash chromatography to get standard which I used for subsequent testing. That´s all...

1. you say you didnt have standard 4 the first test? ur sheet says it was done 4/13
2. then u say u USED external standard on 4/13
3. how coud u use EXTERNAL standard on 4/13 when u say u only make standard on 4/19?!


@mands
 

Attachments

  • gif.GIF
    gif.GIF
    11 KB · Views: 16
good point

thanks for smart thinking, something I cannot say about the rest trying argue about something they do not have clue about
Bro we already know thats you logging into another account lmaoo you really think we are stupid? And to answer your question with the FACTS, gc/ms is used to identify the compound in the test sample because it is more accurate and hplc is used to test the purity of the compounds once identified. Is it really that hard for you to grasp? There has been multiple links posted already go read and stop logging into your other handle. I already told you you're on time out, now stfu and go stand in the corner.
 
Bro we already know thats you logging into another account lmaoo you really think we are stupid? And to answer your question with the FACTS, gc/ms is used to identify the compound in the test sample because it is more accurate and hplc is used to test the purity of the compounds once identified. Is it really that hard for you to grasp? There has been multiple links posted already go read and stop logging into your other handle. I already told you you're on time out, now stfu and go stand in the corner.
if hplc is 4 purity does dat mean gcms cant see purity?
 
Back
Top