Legit Source for Trestolone/ Ment?

No worries my man. I just hate to credit Jano with a blanket statement when I know personally he is not the only one, appreciate you retracting your statement. I see no problem with giving credit when credit is deserved. Reality is if they are an legit analytical firm. Then trest Should not be be an exception. It is a 19-nor from the nandrolone family. Not some space age compound. For those that think it has some magical power that other compounds don’t. Other than one of the metabolites being methyl-estrodial, lol, nothing special about the shit. Just proof that science is able to create yet another compound that really serves no purpose in the real world. Nobody is gonna take the shit as a male contraceptive. The juice is not worth the squeeze. Sort of like anadrol’s use for treating children. It’s just plain silly.

I said I was intrigued by it, not that I was going to sell my first born so that I could run it
 
So Lab4Tox can’t detect it?
No they can't, and neither does SIMEC
Reason being that certified reference standards aren't commercially available, and it doesn't seem to be listed in the NIST GC-MS database.



I dont have problem with W&m in January
View attachment 114580
It doesn't have the GC-MS m/z chart, so he never conclusively identified it as Trestolone.
That could be another substance. Even the whole chart could be made up.
 
No they can't, and neither does SIMEC
Reason being that certified reference standards aren't commercially available, and it doesn't seem to be listed in the NIST GC-MS database.





It doesn't have the GC-MS m/z chart, so he never conclusively identified it as Trestolone.
That could be another substance. Even the whole chart could be made up.

Secend page
Screenshot_20190701-201734_Gallery.jpg
 
Without the Mass Spectrum (m/z chart) those results coulda have been pulled out of the hat.

Out of all possibilities, he's going to get lucky guessing some obscure compound that doesn't get much recognition?

i just find that explanation hard to believe. A blind sample could be any compound or just straight oil. If he's guessing, then he should be in Vegas playing blackjack.
 
Out of all possibilities, he's going to get lucky guessing some obscure compound that doesn't get much recognition?

i just find that explanation hard to believe. A blind sample could be any compound or just straight oil. If he's guessing, then he should be in Vegas playing blackjack.

Hahahahahaha you are completely fucked up !!
1 No reputable, true lab grade chemicals supplier sells Trestolone AFAIK
(Steraloids might sell it, but it's likely an special order item)

2 @Weights & Measures / @janoshik have never shown pics of their reference standards, let alone pics of such a hard to get standard.
(they can post pics with the batch number and expiration date deleted)

3 Without reference standards they can't compare their HPLC or GC-FID retention times to anything.

4 Even if the retention times matches, without a Mass Spectrum (m/z chart) they can't be sure it's Trestolone indeed

5 Even with an m/z chart, there's no NIST (GC-MS library) entry for Trestolone to compare to.
 
Without the Mass Spectrum (m/z chart) those results coulda have been pulled out of the hat.
I get your knowledge on the matter, but come on man - pulled out of a hat? Obviously they have the standard, whether they’ve proven it or not. Unless LabMax has a test for this.
 
Dead thread but wth...

Anyone ever heard of Never settle labs? Apparently it’s a research site with MENT and a few other things...
 
Motorboat Labs has good reviews. They're out of trest at the moment, but they say it will be back in stock in a week or two.
 
Back
Top