MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
If you are referring to the quote above I wrote to iintensity? It was an example of the up-charging that happens. I already claimed later in the thread what "wholesale" price that I can get and it's not $1 an iu. I CAN see where I probably should of used could instead of can.
I can prove what I pay for Pharm Grade GH. Just come on over and visit.
Hahaha you know you are always welcome!I'm hurt you never invited me to "come over and visit"
I actually understand this point Jim. I am dissappointed at the commmunity and lack of participation required on their end. I would probably do the same considering you have done your part. Maybe people will step up but I have a feeling they won't they all have received what they are looking for. It would of probably been best for you and Mands to withhold the test until the community did their part.
I do care this is not the only place I hang out at. There as an agreement that those who donated IgF samples will post IGF tests. I think it is important for these tests not other tests done by other people but IGF samples coming from the same kit ad the samples tested. It seems you are trying too hard to discredit and don't get me wrong I like what you have done in the generic gh world. I think you are reaching here how bad we look. To you and Rajjin maybe. The whole community I think that point is highly debatable. At this point to the whole community it just might be a toss up to who has the agenda. I hear you on the genotropin sample but at this point the only agenda Jim would have is if he is peddling pharm gh and I would be very dissapointed because I have never received a show. As far as PM how many sponsors are peddling generic Gh. See this is how it looks to the community now we have to determine ourselves who has agendas and don't. Who is the laughing stock and who is not. Not easy considering that I don't think Jim has an agenda and I really don't think you do either. So I am left with what at the end of the day. Pharm Gh that is what I am left with.
Thanks Jim, I will check it out. Much appreciated.
I'll explain how the mg/mL were determined for the two gray caps tested, even though you could have figured it out yourself.
AS1776-3 GRAY CAP
The formula used was:
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
The figures inside the {} are from the Humatrope standard and can be found here.
Using the formula,
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
{3.72 mg/ml / 65,493,455} x 25,231,986 = 1.4 mg/ml
y = 1.4 mg/ml
AS1776-1 GRAY CAP
The formula used was:
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
The figures inside the {} are from the Humatrope standard and can be found here.
Using the formula,
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
{3.72 mg/ml / 65,493,455} x 24,773,978 = 1.4 mg/ml
y = 1.4 mg/ml
AS1625-2 rhGH HUMATROPE STANDARD
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
{3.72 mg/ml / 65,493,455} x 65,493,455 = 3.72
As you can see, there were no errors with the mathematics, the chemist didn't use the "wrong equation," and nothing was hidden or withheld. The results are correct.
The question now becomes whether or not you will accept the results or try to find another way to discredit the test. Obviously, that was a rhetorical question.
