4leafclover
New Member
I just posted one above, I don't think you read. You use the slippery slope argument too much, those are not the only combinations of things that can go wrong.
If you've been in any kind of business, there are always more than 4 possible outcomes, you are attempting to over simplify and justify an extreme point of view. There is middle ground, and far less offensive things that can and do happen in this game. Get a grip...
No one has said that a UGL should be given a second chance if they jeopardize human lives. I've personally (read all my posts) argued for stronger critical thinking in the consumer base, as well as avoiding snap buying decisions.
But creating a dictatorship out of an open voice forum is a retarded idea... Standards are a good idea; hard and fast, inflexible rules are not. Unless they pertain to the harm of children, or family.
Done with this thread for a while.
If you've been in any kind of business, there are always more than 4 possible outcomes, you are attempting to over simplify and justify an extreme point of view. There is middle ground, and far less offensive things that can and do happen in this game. Get a grip...
No one has said that a UGL should be given a second chance if they jeopardize human lives. I've personally (read all my posts) argued for stronger critical thinking in the consumer base, as well as avoiding snap buying decisions.
But creating a dictatorship out of an open voice forum is a retarded idea... Standards are a good idea; hard and fast, inflexible rules are not. Unless they pertain to the harm of children, or family.
Done with this thread for a while.