Mass Spec Thread

[whodatnation]

Just what I need. Good news lol. Definitely will be waiting to see this Myth.
Awesome new sub forum Millard!!

Not quite what I meant, although the tests people were waiting on are in and delivered...

I was referring to better news, MS wise

 

[ccccc123]

Not quite what I meant, although the tests people were waiting on are in and delivered...

I was referring to better news, MS wise

Thank you for great contribution around!!!

 

[Nitrust]

We should have a member appreciation thread for members such as mythotiK. I love this forum

 

[alphastrength50]

yes Myth is the man!

 

[lightspan]

titan mass specs. test e, test p, and anavar.

Test e was about 202 mg/ml of powder, the powder was 68% pure. The actual dosing of the finished oil is 55% test e based on 200*.68. Matches up with my bloodwork nicely, about 50%
dosing.

Test p is a joke.

the anavar is a pill, accordingly the concentration number means little, but it is anavar.

 

[lightspan]

clean and clear labs test e

 

[weighted chinup]

titan mass specs. test e, test p, and anavar.

Test e was about 202 mg/ml of powder, the powder was 68% pure. The actual dosing of the finished oil is 55% test e based on 200*.68. Matches up with my bloodwork nicely, about 50%
dosing.

Test p is a joke.

the anavar is a pill, accordingly the concentration number means little, but it is anavar.

68% purity @ 202mg/ml would explain the test levels you got back on your labs earlier in the Titan thread.

At a little over 50% of the advertised dosed, your labs seem to line up fairly well with Dr.Scally's estimate on where serum t levels should fall...

That prop is miserable. The only explanation for such a piss poor product would be a complete lack of quality control measures on Titans end.

 

[Colt44]

titan mass specs. test e, test p, and anavar.

Test e was about 202 mg/ml of powder, the powder was 68% pure. The actual dosing of the finished oil is 55% test e based on 200*.68. Matches up with my bloodwork nicely, about 50%
dosing.

Test p is a joke.

the anavar is a pill, accordingly the concentration number means little, but it is anavar.

The TE is no surprise whatsoever. Maybe some of these guys that have been saying you're right where you should be @2k will shut the hell up and find some properly dosed gear.

I guess you know why that prop was giving you so much pip. A lot of junk in there.

 

[flexx89]

the prop was killing me too. per 1ml how many mgs we talking ? salvageable or throw away?

 

[weighted chinup]

the prop was killing me too. per 1ml how many mgs we talking ? salvageable or throw away?

It's 76mg/ml @ 29% purity. 76*.29 = 22.04mg/ml is the finished product.

 

[flenser]

I'm still struggling with the low quantities of total powder in both test e and test p. I would have expected the exact opposite.

20% more instead of 20% less in the test e would have placed the hormone concentration at 204mg/ml and probably wouldn't have prompted LS to question his blood work.

25% more in the the test p instead of 25% less wouldn't have helped much, I guess. It's still pretty much bunk at 36mg/ml.

 

[showstoppa]

Not surprised by either result

 

[diesel707]

These results are just pitiful...fuck you think if you were a source you would test your own raw before brewing. Hell that's how people used to do it pre ORD. Lazy bastards these days.

 

[flexx89]

thanks for the math @weighted chinup

 

[devildog93]

So the best thing you had tested was the clean and clear test e @ 180mg or so where it was supposed to be 250mg/ml? My math might be off a bit, but damn. If i read it correctly it is underdosed to being with at 230mg of whatever instead of 250mg, then that 230mg is only 74% purity...making it 170mg/ml unless i did something wrong.

So basically you are having to do 4-5 shots to get what you would have expected to get from 3, awesome. What is sad is that is about as good as anything that i have seen tested lately.

 

[diesel707]

So the best thing you had tested was the clean and clear test e @ 180mg or so where it was supposed to be 250mg/ml? My math might be off a bit, but damn. If i read it correctly it is underdosed to being with at 230mg of whatever instead of 250mg, then that 230mg is only 74% purity...making it 170mg/ml unless i did something wrong.

So basically you are having to do 4-5 shots to get what you would have expected to get from 3, awesome. What is sad is that is about as good as anything that i have seen tested lately.

I agree pretty dismal really that this is one of the better results we have had. I have a couple I would like to send in when a chance comes to see how the "private" ones come to results.

 

[vvegas]

I saw cnc run off a paid board for screwing people over and completely burning them if I remember correctly ..

 

[tileguy123]

Hey guys I know there was some pathetic results from the MS on GETM

Test E,
Mast was Deca
and deca was underdosed test ,

but did anyone see results or labmax confirmation of the DBOL or ANAVAR

I have 2 bottles of ea from GETM ...

direction to any links where these were tested would be great

 

[FuriousWO]

So the best thing you had tested was the clean and clear test e @ 180mg or so where it was supposed to be 250mg/ml? My math might be off a bit, but damn. If i read it correctly it is underdosed to being with at 230mg of whatever instead of 250mg, then that 230mg is only 74% purity...making it 170mg/ml unless i did something wrong.

So this math is correct that's how you calculate the dosage from a mass spec? I'm asking out of ignorance nothing else

 

[matthewrhopkins]

It goes to show you that you really can't trust the mass spec results posted by the suppliers/sellers themselves.
These people have a vested interest in obtaining a good result from these tests.

Unfortunately, due illegality of these substances, we do not have the luxury of an independent third-party agency, such as the FDA , to conduct tests and ensure the safety of consumer products. Although the FDA should hardly be considered truly independent with all the lobbying and former corporate officers who get appointed to high positions in the FDA.

The burden lies on the consumers to ascertain the purity and the quality of products that we use. On that note, thank you MythotiK for being vigilant.

If anyone knows a European or foreign laboratory that conducts mass specs, please let me know. I want to ensure the quality of the products that I use and I am willing to pay for the testing myself.