Mass Spec Thread

This is awesome. I mean its terrible to see a bad test that people used money to buy, but hopefully this info will reach the people affected so they pitch that shit.
 
Mythotic you are the freaking man bro, we all owe you a huge thank you.

MFL I couldnt be more disappointed in you guys a mainstay here making a fortune off this board meanwhile taking zero precautions to make sure members are getting quality safe gear. You guys have shot the golden goose.

Htp You will surely be receiving an order from me in the near future I can measure my own var out no problem. These tests are finally a way to weed out the men among the boys. A complete game changer.
 
Mythotic you are the freaking man bro, we all owe you a huge thank you.

MFL I couldnt be more disappointed in you guys a mainstay here making a fortune off this board meanwhile taking zero precautions to make sure members are getting quality safe gear. You guys have shot the golden goose.

Htp You will surely be receiving an order from me in the near future I can measure my own var out no problem. These tests are finally a way to weed out the men among the boys. A complete game changer.

You are welcome, but I can't take all the credit, lots of good people on this board who make it all happen...
 
Does anyone know if the purity can be changed significantly from the brewing process?
80% isn't bad on QR's tren-ace, but it's certainly not the 97%+ pure they claim. I am going to still use them since they are the best out of the few public powder sources available.
 
I dont think the tren ace at 53% means its only half the mg.
    • 100mg/ml is slightly over‐estimated.
slightly isnt 47mg
 
I honestly think these labs won't pay. I know guys have asked labs to pay and they are hesitant to say the least. Bottom line it is up to us. We could assign a few trusted members, because it should be in the hands of a few not just one, to handle bitcoin, reload cards or whatever to get testing done. This is the next phase in the ugl world period
 
I honestly think these labs won't pay. I know guys have asked labs to pay and they are hesitant to say the least. Bottom line it is up to us. We could assign a few trusted members, because it should be in the hands of a few not just one, to handle bitcoin, reload cards or whatever to get testing done. This is the next phase in the ugl world period
UGLs aren't even willing to do this type of testing privately (to assure their raw powders or their final product is good). They obviously don't want to pay for the results to be public when they little confidence themselves knowing exactly what the results will be.
 
UGLs aren't even willing to do this type of testing privately (to assure their raw powders or their final product is good). They obviously don't want to pay for the results to be public when they little confidence themselves knowing exactly what the results will be.

I agree. Youll have a hard time getting labs to put money up for this kinda of testing, but it doesnt hurt to ask. I think some know they arent getting quality raws, and still produce product anyways. Just to make money..
 
I honestly think these labs won't pay. I know guys have asked labs to pay and they are hesitant to say the least. Bottom line it is up to us. We could assign a few trusted members, because it should be in the hands of a few not just one, to handle bitcoin, reload cards or whatever to get testing done. This is the next phase in the ugl world period
Meso is a high traffic FREE source board that is effectively run by it's members.

A year's worth of testing would likely still be cheaper than a single monthly sponsorship fee on some source boards. It's inevitable for powder sources to go south but as long as the problems are rectified it's a non-issue.

The very nature of a free source board unfortunately attracts cheap undesirable sources with an even shorter shelf life than most UGLs. If nothing else it will help weed them out.
 
Are you saying that MFL tren isn't 53% dosed or 53 mg but more like 85-95mg?

Hormone was only 53% pure, the mg/ml are roughly around 85-95mg...So the product is under dosed per the label and the hormone purity is no where near where it should be...
 
Can you further explain that Myth. I am guessing that because you are saying that each ml contains 85-95 mg of tren that it isn't the same as say a tren testing at 90 percent purity with the same mg per ml. This is were I am getting confused.
 
Back
Top