lightspan
New Member
I agree with you on this point and I have no reason to believe otherwise. My point is, what makes your contribution credible or anyone else's, without first hand knowledge to the quality of his product or services?
I'm not knocking Mike, I'm just saying, statements of support for any source without personal knowledge can influence eager and gullible newbies to attempt an order before all the facts are in.
I'm not focusing on Mike, but this happens too often with other sources even without the reputation Mike has.
Interesting point regarding noobs jumping too soon, but Mike has chosen to protect himself and noobs alike by only accepting vets or those who can have vets to vouch for them. I approve of this practice. With other "new" sources that pop up though, this point is quite valid.