*ALERT Source avoids responsibility!*
For those who already know me here on the forum, you are aware of my concern about sources for the community. This time it happened to me. I ordered a pack of retatrutide from this source on 19/11/2025. Payment was made, everything was fine. It was shipped after 3 business days, all good. The problems started with the delivery. I was tracking the delivery and noticed that the package was marked as delivered to someone named "FLOR." Flor is a female name in Portugal. I checked the street where the delivery was registered, and it was not mine. Immediately, I informed the source on Telegram and explained that it was marked as delivered but not to me, rather to someone named Flor. I called DPD, and the information I received was that the sender had to contact them since they are the main client of DPD. I asked the source to urgently call them so the error could be detected in time. Today, 7 days have passed since the delivery, and the source on Telegram is starting to blame me! It's surreal. I was accused of trying to scam the source (even though I made sure to send the DPD tracking, which clearly says: "Received by Flor," and it also shows the street where it was delivered, which DOES NOT match mine). I was accused of signing as Flor (a 95kg bearded man signing as Flor=Flower would be the most normal thing in the world), and the source just wants me to place another order to compensate for the mistake. Obviously, since I don’t need more products and have no responsibility for what happened, I did not accept. I just want to receive what I paid for. At this moment, I am without money and without the product, waiting for a resolution that is either a reshipment of the product or a refund, something the source refuses to do. I will update here in posts as things progress. I didn’t want to attach photos of the Telegram conversation for principles' sake because, even after being fully accused of everything without any proof (and if the source denies it, I will attach the Telegram conversation), I still think it’s wrong to expose personal conversations unless strictly necessary. I am waiting for a resolution, and after 7 days of insisting, posting here is my only option.
For now, I will attach only the part with the source’s brilliant suggestion.