One Pharma: Bulk Cyp

but the relationship IS linear.
If 250mg a week gets us a peak of 2500, and 600mg a peak of 6000, then 1500 should get us 15000 and 1850 will get us 18500. Still Linear. There is no "diminishing returns" on blood serum levels. Just diminishing returns on the anabolic effect.

There are plus and minus in my opinion that go in effect here due to metabolism rates with drug absorption.

I am leaning that 7x is the lower end of what may be deemed acceptable although should draw suspicion of possible under dosing. With obviously 10x being the higher end.

Ofcourse this is only a theory. It would need mass spec to be conclusive.
 
The probl
There are plus and minus in my opinion that go in effect here due to metabolism rates with drug absorption.

I am leaning that 7x is the lower end of what may be deemed acceptable although should draw suspicion of possible under dosing. With obviously 10x being the higher end.

Ofcourse this is only a theory. It would need mass spec to be conclusive.

The problem is that there is mass spec.
 
Well I'm referring to the research study on the participant to evaluate dose relation to blood serum.

Blood analysis with mass spec would be required.
 
It might not look like it, but it will go back into solution. Fill a pan up with water and heat until they fully dissolve. Mine was crashed when I got it as well, and has not crashed since I heated them up.
 
So...what's the deal? Is the mass spec data garbage or is the most recent blood labs to be taken at full face value?

I feel like its the elephant in the room right now
 
what did the bloods come in at?
If the mass spec was from angus, the purity is an estimate and is not a sign of concentration.
 
Harry, are all those vials actually filled at different levels or does it just appear that way due to them crashing? Can't quite tell from pic
I have to heat them up to get them back in solution and then we can see if any are under filled
 
image.jpg

Here you go....back in solution and you can see the levels of each vial in this pic...note the two on the end are shorter vials....
 
Is it just me or does it look like the 4th bottle from the left starts a downward slope to the 7th one? My eyes may be playing tricks on me but I doubt it. What you think meso? Correct me if I'm wrong! The last vial although short still looks as if its missing some also.
 
Also the 4th vial back from the right looks like it could be missing a half ml or more.
 
Back
Top