Let's just cut the shit ok?
I brought up a very thoroughly researched and documented argument that all point to the fact the small "de minimus" packages everyone gets their gear and ancillaries from are gong to be subject to much stricter enforcement in the very near future. I pointed out it would be prudent to stock up because once this happens, it's very likely going to get much harder to get these things than it is now. We just got a very small taste of it with India pharma vendors all experiencing a significant uptick in seizures.
After some low information clowns dismissed that out of hand, like Malfeasance, Declan, a Canadian who takes the opposite position of everything I say, announced, in the name of "Harm Reduction" that this was terrible, dangerous advice and would lead to arrests for "intent to distribute". His followers, like Dirthand, immediately started parroting that line, insisting I was putting people in danger with this terrible advice. "Stocking up" was presented as some terribly risky, life destroying advice and I should stop saying it immediately.
Of course they present no details, no law, none of the elements required to be charged with the crime, no news stories, no cases, and certainly no convictions. The legal equivalent of "feels".
All these cases must be sealed from the public record, and defendants flown out to Guantanamo Bay for secret trial and held prisoner in black sites.
Exactly how much stocking up would make my advice the "Harm" these retards were screaming it is? How much would put you in danger of "Intent to distribute"? 2 vials? 1 multi dose vial? They can't answer, because they're know nothings who don't possess any intellectual integrity.
BTW, clowns, most states mirror federal law, where .5ml is a "unit" of anabolic steroid oil. 20 units per 10ml vial. Up to 999 units, 49 vials, is the same offense level as one GRAM of pot. Ooo, better not "stock up" or you're going down for hard time. There, look at that, you've learned something about this subject that's factual, and not based on your "gut feeling", irrelevant anecdotes, and third hand stories.
Unlike them, I did the legwork, looking into the law, searching cases in the databases set up for that purpose, and the news.
There's not a single case documented anywhere of simple possession of AAS being prosecuted as "intent to distribute" without a pile of evidence unquestionably demonstrating sales.
And it dawned on me these "Harm Reduction" hypocrites had not only turned their homes into drug labs, becoming Schedule III manufacturers, the highest level of drug crime by the way, and god help you if there's a gun in the house adding a mandatory DECADE to the sentence, they actively encourage others to do so without ONCE warning of the serious, real, consequences of what happens if someone is caught. Unlike the imaginary "caught with 2 dozen vials of Test" at home they claim I'm putting people at "great risk" for suggesting, manufacturing does get prosecuted on a regular basis.
It's not about harm reduction by warning of the dangers of "stocking up", leading to "intent to distribute" charges. It's about some retards with a grudge saying whatever bullshit sounds good to take a swipe at me.
I bring research, the law, and facts to the table. They bring nothing but feelings and anecdotes.