PEP test-e contaminant testing?

Tao, buddy, bad news... That's just you. I may have mites in my eyebrows and strange fungus under my toenails, but worms are not a standard human accessory.

I knew I shouldn't have sniffed all that dog shit. I thought we had those as well as other parasites?
 
I knew I shouldn't have sniffed all that dog shit. I thought we had those as well as other parasites?

Our bodies are pretty much a cesspool of bacteria

[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_microbiome]Human microbiome - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

But, if you have worms, I suggest a heartgard. :D
 
Last edited:
TRT patients and AAS users inject air into the vial to equalize pressure. Considering the air is often not clean (maybe unless you have a HEPA filter), aren't we also injecting similar bacteria into muscle like found in this vial? I agree it would be wise to filter it, thanks for testing 03xx
 
I supposed but there are not many aerosol bacteria around. I'll try to find a paper so you don't have to take my word for it.
 
Hi 0352 ( tow gunner I guess ? )

Thanks for doing this.

I am wondering do you have access to pharm Test like Watson ?

I am curious as to how that would compare vs Peps vs Your Mouth Sample.

So if pharm grade had 0 black dots then that would mean PEP was a bit dirty.

Would be nice to have something aside from Labmax to test a source.

And thanks again ( 2nd time )
 
Pharma stuff won't have anything they have incredibly strict guidelines to follow. I would test it if I could get my hands on it though. The mouth is an extreme example, if peps stuff had that level of bacteria after 24 hrs it would be bad. It was a low level contamination that will be mitigated by filtration...be a tow gunner they said, no humping, then they gave me a jav and took our trucks away in country haha
 
I've been following this thread very close as I'm on my 5th pin of test-e.

What do you guys make of Goose's post in pep's main thread regarding him seeing no bacterial contanimation?

I do not see any indication of what you deem as "bacterial contamination" in these slides.
Id say so if I did and I dont.
A brand new house has a large amount of foreign bacteria just from the people traipsing through it.
BA is bacteriostatic(not bacteriocidal) yet it would be highly unlikely any compound which is oil-based and posessing a minimum of 2-4% Ba Harbors any prolific colonies though it is highly likely that it may posess microbes of a staggering array but not likely in any quantity to support a tangible threat to anyone with even a compromised immune system.(though technically possible). It would be foolhardy to use any AS when physically compromised unless ordered and closely monitored by a competent healthcare provider. Wouldnt you agree?
It is a simple matter of a sterile or evacuated vial just doesnt doesnt have what the vast majority of human-harmful microbial entities need to thrive. Yes there are strains of anaerobic bacteria which can and do live in the airless environment likened to a vial but the number of microbes which are considered lipophagocytotic,or being able to survive by"eating" lipids are pretty rare comparatively speaking.
I find it interesting that someone with the vast amount of organic chemistry knowledge you must posess to postulate such a theory would crawl so far out on a limb as to suggest otherwise
I didnt know really how else to nip such a preposterous statement in the bud before some folks misinterpret what youve said as anything even approaching plausability.
No hard feelings Im sure!
If I were you, and Im certainly not,not smart enough sadly...Id choose law as a profession as opposed to microbiology as lawyers are notorious for asking questions they already know the answers to such as"Has Kane provided a response to any of the questions he was asked to provide the answers to?"
That is actually clever how you have used terms like"floatergate" in quotation marks as if to suggest that you are truly quoting someone other than yourself!
Yes,Were you an attorney I should like to engage your services if I were to be caught doing something I shouldnt be doing! HAHA(I KID!!)
Forgive me but Im not sure if this post is a treatise from the Centers for Disease Control or an article in a grocery store tabloid.
Actually I think the author is just having a bit of fun with those of us not wise enough to tell the difference!!
He sure is a kidder!!! Thanks for the witty post BR..I havent had such a powerful belly laugh all day! Do please write some more,Im eager for another moment of joviality!
Good day Sir,
Goose
 
If he does not see bacteria in the photos I have provided he is not very versed in bacteria culturing. There is clearly bacteria in both of those photographs.
 
I've been following this thread very close as I'm on my 5th pin of test-e.



What do you guys make of Goose's post in pep's main thread regarding him seeing no bacterial contanimation?


I think this test needs to be done across a wide array of gear ( pharm, naps, Astro etc ) for us to SEE what the bar should set at.

Personally my bar is only the best if it goes in my body.
 
If he does not see bacteria in the photos I have provided he is not very versed in bacteria culturing. There is clearly bacteria in both of those photographs.

That is not what he is saying. If you read his post, he is implying that the amount of bacteria in these slides does not deem it to be considered contamination.
 
The definition of contamination is the presence of minor and unwanted constituants. This is a mild contamination, you can filter it out and most people will be fine. Personally I don't want to be the that cannot kill these cells and gets an acute infection. There is a reason that the FDA has such stringent requirements for injectable medication sterility. For me I am happier knowing that there is some level of bacteria around and that level is low enough to filter out.
 
Last edited:
Quick question, yesterday after I was done filtering the test I pulled what was left in the filter and it was gelatin like or coagulated oil.
What was that exactly? And is it possible the 2 u filter would also filter some of the steriods molecules or this is impossible due to size? Thanks
 
The coagulation could have been some oil with air bubbles or even the filter itself. You will not filter out any steroid molecules.
 
Ok thanks, just want to make sure I won't be injecting pure salad oil for couple of months, I am marinated and greasy enough.

And I didn't heat the oil prior to filtering just after to clear it from the air bubbles. Will see if all this has any impact on the pip.
 
Hey samsc. A question if it's cool I would go back and read what you said but finding it in this thread would be like a needle in haystack cause it moves so fast. I know your talking about test e but can you tell me more about your pip. Just trying to get a frame of reference, I have some but don't plan to use it for a bit. Thanks man.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top