Pharmacom/Basic sold bunk/underdosed products for all orders MAY and JUNE

[stayinalive]

Ultimately you cannot trust any source out there. All you can do is go off of past experiences, blood work, and mass spectrometry testing through available means.

You want to avoid the guessing and potential money lost? Don't use gear. It's as simple as that.

It's not as simple as that. As consumers we GET that the potential of being scammed is ALWAYS going to be there. The problem here is that pharmacom has done this repeatedly and they are STILL allowed to sell here to scam MORE members. Every other source that acts like this gets kicked out of meso forever. Did pharmacom buy out meso or something? This has gotten ridiculous. Not the first time this is happened,but it should be the last. Members have lost way too much money Deadflex,more than most people make in a year in the United States. These guys need to take their scams and shady business practices out of meso.

 

[Dema]

If we scammed and sold bunk gear we wouldn't be here.. Meso wouldn't allow it you are right about that.. But we don't so that exactly why we are still here and we have hundreds of happy customers

 

[stayinalive]

If we scammed and sold bunk gear we wouldn't be here.. Meso wouldn't allow it you are right about that.. But we don't so that exactly why we are still here and we have hundreds of happy customers

Aren't you guys forum sponsors? I could have sworn I saw a pharmacom advertisement on the front page. Hmm are you here because you aren't scammers or because you "pay" people off????

 

[Millard]

ANABOLICLAB proves nothing. They can send a good vial to them and bad vials to everyone else.

@Millard Baker is this statement true?

No. It's not true. @stayinalive has no idea what he is talking about regarding AnabolicLab's procedure for sample collection.

Frequently Asked Questions - Anabolic Lab

Q: Do the manufacturers and/vendors know which products are being tested?

A: All samples are purchased secretly and anonymously from online steroid sources and submitted to an accredited lab testing facility without the knowledge of any seller or manufacturer. Every effort is made to ensure that sellers and manufacturers have no idea who is purchasing the product, which product is purchased, or when the product is purchased.​

 

[stayinalive]

No. It's not true. @stayinalive has no idea what he is talking about regarding AnabolicLab's procedure for sample collection.

Frequently Asked Questions - Anabolic Lab

Q: Do the manufacturers and/vendors know which products are being tested?

A: All samples are purchased secretly and anonymously from online steroid sources and submitted to an accredited lab testing facility without the knowledge of any seller or manufacturer. Every effort is made to ensure that sellers and manufacturers have no idea who is purchasing the product, which product is purchased, or when the product is purchased.​

Millard,why is pharmacom allowed to keep selling here if they already have pulled similar stunts in the past. Is it really worth ruining the forums integrity over some sponsorship money? I thought meso was about the CONSUMER and not the SOURCE. Why isn't pharmacom held to the same standard as everyone else on here?

Why are they allowed to sell if they have MULTIPLE scam reports. One vial that's legit proves nothing.

Also whats with advertising pharmacom on the main website? That seems to be a conflict of interest for our members.

@Millard Baker

 

[Millard]

Millard,why is pharmacom allowed to keep selling here if they already have pulled similar stunts in the past. Is it really worth ruining the forums integrity over some sponsorship money? I thought meso was about the CONSUMER and not the SOURCE. Why isn't pharmacom held to the same standard as everyone else on here?

Why are they allowed to sell if they have MULTIPLE scam reports. One vial that's legit proves nothing.

You really have no clue how the MESO forum works, do you?

MESO doesn't approve of any source. The official policy is to avoid ALL sources. MESO has never done a damn thing to help Pharmacom in the forum discussions. This is the exact same standard applied to every single source.

Don't believe me? Ask any knowledgeable member who has been here for any length of time and they will confirm that MESO has never intervened on behalf of any source.

MESO is 100% about consumer choice. MESO doesn't tell anyone who to buy steroids. MESO doesn't tell anyone who not to buy steroids from. The consumer assumes all responsibility for making decisions based on the information presented on the forum.

MESO encourages honest feedback on all sources including "scam reports". We have no doubt that there is an abundance of both credible feedback and fake feedback on the forum. However, we leave it to consumers to determine the credibility of the reports, both positive feedback and negative.

The only time MESO has banned sources from participating is due to threats of physical violence made against MESO members and/or their family members.

 

[stayinalive]

@Millard Baker Why are there pharmacom advertisements on the homepage then? Meso was supposed to be the safest place for harm reduction towards the consumer. Now we have Pharmacom advertisements on the homepage.

Don't you think taking money from Pharmacom/Basic hurts the credibility/integrity of your website?

@Millard Baker do you accept compensation from Pharmacom to post an advertisement on the front of your page?

Here you said:
"MESO doesn't approve of any source. The official policy is to avoid ALL sources. MESO has never done a damn thing to help Pharmacom in the forum discussions. This is the exact same standard applied to every single source. "

If that is the case why are they being advertised on the front-page. That sounds like an endorsement,am I wrong?

 

[Millard]

@Millard Baker Why are there pharmacom advertisements on the homepage then? Meso was supposed to be the safest place for harm reduction towards the consumer. Now we have Pharmacom advertisements on the homepage.

Don't you think taking money from Pharmacom/Basic hurts the credibility/integrity of your website?

Do you understand the concept of an advertising-supported revenue model used by broadcast, print and web publishers?

Publishers generate revenue by selling ad space. The publishers do not endorse the companies that advertise on their platform.

Since when have you ever opened up the New York Times, Wall Street Journal or seen a Google Ad and concluded "Gee, those publishers must endorse their advertisers as good-to-go". I'm sure a few idiots would make this assumption but you're not one of those, are you?

 

[Docd187123]

Dont make me put up the post where you defend pharmacom. You are trying to bail pharmacom out of this one fuck that.

Fartacom is leaving this board.

Right here 40 page thread on pharmacom fucking members over. Yet they are still allowed to sell here.

@Pharmacom Helper @Pharmacom Labs @IronJulius

And don't make me correct you yet again. Going after the truth doesn't mean I'm defending anyone but the truth. BigPaul started that thread bc he thought pharmacom sold Luca NPP that had bacteria/mold in it. I explained why it wasn't bacteria/mold and Simec confirmed that there was no bacterial contamination in the sample.

Golly this game is fun. What's next?

 

[Docd187123]

Since when have you ever opened up the New York Times, Wall Street Journal or seen a Google Ad and concluded "Gee, those publishers must endorse their advertisers as good-to-go". I'm sure a few idiots would make this assumption but you're not one of those, are you?

I'm good at answering the obvious so I'll answer this...yes, he is one of those idiots apparently lol

 

[stayinalive]

And don't make me correct you yet again. Going after the truth doesn't mean I'm defending anyone but the truth. BigPaul started that thread bc he thought pharmacom sold Luca NPP that had bacteria/mold in it. I explained why it wasn't bacteria/mold and Simec confirmed that there was no bacterial contamination in the sample.

Golly this game is fun. What's next?

There was two vials that looked like mold from two different people. If you want to read this thread you will find it. Stop defending pharmacom.

 

[Docd187123]

There was two vials that looked like mold from two different people. If you want to read this thread you will find it. Stop defending pharmacom.

I participated in the original thread by Luca and the thread big Paul started in response to it, the same one you copied here. Apparently you didn't bother to go after the truth and look for Simec's result of the bacterial contamination testing like I did bc then you'd have seen that what you think is mold was really crashed gear. If you want the truth you'll have to read to find it by otherwise you're free to live in your fantasy world.

 

[stayinalive]

Do you understand the concept of an advertising-supported revenue model used by broadcast, print and web publishers?

Publishers generate revenue by selling ad space. The publishers do not endorse the companies that advertise on their platform.

Since when have you ever opened up the New York Times, Wall Street Journal or seen a Google Ad and concluded "Gee, those publishers must endorse their advertisers as good-to-go". I'm sure a few idiots would make this assumption but you're not one of those, are you?

Pharmacom is plastered all over the website. I am just saying the community isn't what it was 10 years ago,I think you know that @Millard Baker . I admire the hustle but it's coming out of members pockets. This is a matter of integrity @Millard Baker you could at least ask pharmacom to refund the members here and to keep the scamming to the other forums that they bought out. Please at least consider telling them,no more bunk with the meso members.

@Millard Baker I understand they pay you good money,but have some mercy on some of the members here. Lot's of people here are good hard working Americans and they cannot afford to lose 1000$.

 

[stayinalive]

I participated in the original thread by Luca and the thread big Paul started in response to it, the same one you copied here. Apparently you didn't bother to go after the truth and look for Simec's result of the bacterial contamination testing like I did bc then you'd have seen that what you think is mold was really crashed gear. If you want the truth you'll have to read to find it by otherwise you're free to live in your fantasy world.

This is crashed gear?

 

[retpsd]

Before being called out on meso for being a rep on another board, I was just in fact another member here, I was a memeber here for more than a year before I even rep for Darius"... I know you might not agree with that but it's true. There was no answering pms or helping customers... I was just another member here talking shit learn/talking bout some juice... Now being called out this above is exactly why I say I'm forced here....

@Dema The smallest words have the largest meanings.
What you were is no longer relevant here because of what you are now.

Understand that statement is not personal and I'm not rep-hating by saying it.
It's the same discussion for a former member who turns source on MESO.

Even if you're intent wasn't to rep Pharmacom products on MESO, I'm assuming it was your choice to do so on other boards.

Once your alliance on other boards was discovered here by members, your legit choices here were:
Leave MESO or Publicly rep Pcom here as well.
You chose that latter, MESO members didn't force you to stay then and no members of MESO are forcing you to stay now.

 

[Docd187123]

This is crashed gear?

This is contaminated gear?



In regards to your picture, you either have the poster hike for Darwinism bc someone injected half of that vial with that in there or that person introduced contamination due to their practices. No way to prove it was the manufacturer since the goal has been opened and used and it's very convenient that the fingers cover the crimping on the vial so you can't see if the vial was opened and tampered with.

 

[Pharmacom Helper]

Dont make me put up the post where you defend pharmacom. You are trying to bail pharmacom out of this one fuck that.

Fartacom is leaving this board.

Right here 40 page thread on pharmacom fucking members over. Yet they are still allowed to sell here.

@Pharmacom Helper @Pharmacom Labs @IronJulius

This thread have a direct link with problem which one of our customer faced (crashed gear). And this thread created because paul think that we sell gear with mold.
Here is test result: Pharmacom npp simec

 

[stayinalive]

This is contaminated gear?

View attachment 72940

In regards to your picture, you either have the poster hike for Darwinism bc someone injected half of that vial with that in there or that person introduced contamination due to their practices. No way to prove it was the manufacturer since the goal has been opened and used and it's very convenient that the fingers cover the crimping on the vial so you can't see if the vial was opened and tampered with.

Docd but there are more pictures of the vial in the thread. You are a shill you have exposed yourself. You were defending pharmacom even though " I dont use pharma because I brew my own gear" so why are you defending them so hard then??Want me to post more pictures??

 

[stayinalive]

This thread have a direct link with problem which one of our customer faced (crashed gear). And this thread created because paul think that we sell gear with mold.
Here is test result: Pharmacom npp simec

That is a different vial do not try to grow a brain here.

Just some crashed gear right?

 

[Pharmacom Helper]

That is a different vial do not try to grow a brain here.

Just some crashed gear right?

I don't know what is this. And personally for me - it's strange to use gear with contamintaion like that. Don't you think so?