Well, I may be an idiot but so are you.
You did not get what I meant, at all, and I am not "insinuating" anything.
But according to you, i am defending the source.
Seriously.
I didn't place any "doubt on customers concerns".
Where is that?
You are manipulating this in the way it pleases you and I couldn't care less for it.
I certainly don't disagree with the principled stance you are trying to exhibit here but where has this been?
Even being able to do it, you wouldn't practice what you preach, since you are so concerned about customers being ripped off, because people would think you do it for financial gain.
This is bs.
However, you have now redeemed yourself; you have had the chance for a bit of swagger, here, to take issue with someone questioning the all talk no action, and what kind of "harm reduction" all that awareness has produced.
So this you write: "i think it has to do with a lack of masculinity, and years of subtle propaganda from large companies themselves" you do in reverse.
They defend so as not to be accused and so do you.
I respect + appreciate all the members that, instead, are on sources threads, every day, pushing for accountability, real change and improvements, even if they get accused by others or the sources themselves to have an "agenda" to bring them down.
You do you and philosophise about the lack of masculinity, in the meant time.
To each their own.
