Pharmacom Labs Bold 300 - HPLC-UV - 2015-06 - performed by SIMEC via AnabolicLab.com

I would definitely like to hear Dr JIM's thoughts on whether or not the data in the LABMAX / MMC testing report is sufficient or of a good standard though.

If I haven't done so in the next few days, it would help if you would either post or forward a PM my way as a reminder to do exactly that, mate.
 
(Oh and by the looks of the Pharmacon Bolo pic, whoever purchased these products is buying in HIGH VOLUME, which is far removed from what one may expect or need to receive as a cyclist, the latter being more susceptible to selective scamming IME)

Why would you make such a baseless claim (accusation)? How can you conclude "whoever purchased these products is buying in HIGH VOLUME" from pictures of a single product?!? Please share. (BTW, you are wrong - this was no bulk purchase.)



It's pretty simple really if one desires reproducible results the samples MUST be obtained by TRUSTED NO BODIES, WEEKEND WARRIORS OR someone similar to your average Meso member! Otherwise I'm inclined to believe selective sample distribution to those whom are "well known in forum or BB circles" is responsible, at least in part for results I've never seen the likes of before.

Your inclination that lab results were positive because samples must have been obtained by "well known in forum or BB circles" is also wrong.

I've already addressed the reasons why buyers who are well-known in bodybuilding circles and forums who have a long order history and established relationship with a source are terrible choices. As you can see, I am in agreement with you on the importance of this.

For the record, I will explicitly state that the trusted buyers used for the first batch of samples are not at all well-known on bodybuilding forums or bodybuilding circles. They are not competitors and I don't think most even post at all on bodybuilding/steroid forums. Furthermore, they had never previously ordered from the reseller/source. Not only that, they had never previously used any of the products of the manufacturers selected for testing.

I'd still like to know why the involved web sites are not being revealed.
I realize you may not agree with the reasons but I've already answered this question many times in this thread and others.
 
I would like to say TY to Millard and all the people behind Anabolic Lab and all the people that donate, I think its amazing wot you lot are doing Thanks
 
Why would you make such a baseless claim (accusation)? How can you conclude "whoever purchased these products is buying in HIGH VOLUME" from pictures of a single product?!? Please share. (BTW, you are wrong - this was no bulk purchase.)





Your inclination that lab results were positive because samples must have been obtained by "well known in forum or BB circles" is also wrong.

I've already addressed the reasons why buyers who are well-known in bodybuilding circles and forums who have a long order history and established relationship with a source are terrible choices. As you can see, I am in agreement with you on the importance of this.

For the record, I will explicitly state that the trusted buyers used for the first batch of samples are not at all well-known on bodybuilding forums or bodybuilding circles. They are not competitors and I don't think most even post at all on bodybuilding/steroid forums. Furthermore, they had never previously ordered from the reseller/source. Not only that, they had never previously used any of the products of the manufacturers selected for testing.


I realize you may not agree with the reasons but I've already answered this question many times in this thread and others.

My error I mistook the Alpha box for what I thought contained ten 10ml vials of Bolo.

Apologies
Jim
 
Back
Top