Pharmacom Labs / TEST-E 300 1-9-15 Pharmacomstore

[Johnson513]

Video Removed

The vials are relabeled for stealth purposes. That's why I taped the label. You can see the cap and the backside of the label has the Pharmacom mark.

This is supposed to be Test-E 300.
It glowed at first, kind of, then faded away pretty quick. I've seen well dosed Test-E first hand with labmax and this just isn't it... I would expect to see a lot more glow, and continual glow over time.

This is my 8th labmax, so I'm no expert, but this is a fail in my mind...

Pic- 7 minutes after drops


Pic- 10 minutes after drops


Pic- 12 minutes after drops


Thoughts gentlemen?

 

[fresnos2k]

Thanks for taking the time to test and informing the rest of us. Always appreciated.

 

[ebkallday]

What oil was used? MCT, GSO? Apperently the two make a huge difference.

If its GSO I wouldn't hold much weight on that labmax just yet. I'd post the link but I'm on my phone. Peep the new thread on oils in labmax in the testing section.

 

[BIGMESC]

I looked like it started to glow at first then fizzled out.
check this thread as ebkallday said.
https://thinksteroids.com/community/posts/1190287/

 

[Johnson513]

I looked like it started to glow at first then fizzled out.
check this thread as ebkallday said.
https://thinksteroids.com/community/posts/1190287/

What oil was used? MCT, GSO? Apperently the two make a huge difference.

If its GSO I wouldn't hold much weight on that labmax just yet. I'd post the link but I'm on my phone. Peep the new thread on oils in labmax in the testing section.

Generally speaking,

Yes, I read the thread and the findings by Jonsal which is a great find....
BUT, the colors I am comparing to are the ones from labmax which hasn't posted a MCT oil base color. So, if I'm using the same base or a base similar to the LM site, I would expect a glow like the chart states on the LM site....

For instance, the Ultimate Pharmacuticals labmax test I did came out with a strong constant glow. UPharma uses GSO...
https://thinksteroids.com/community...0---Labmax---12-31-14.134361276/#post-1181532

IMO, LM still works for comparing any oil EXCEPT for MCT. In the case that a UGL uses MCT, the glow would benefit the seller more than the buyer.
In using the Ultimate Pharma LM test as a baseline, the Pharmacom sample doesn't come close as I see an initial glow that quickly faded.

Maybe Pharmacom should think about a crossover.... I know I would if I was the CEO of JohnsonPharma.

 

[ebkallday]

Well in that case brother, it looks like you got crap. Almost looks like test C. Def not 300mg/ml Test E that's for sure. Darius has been around a little bit, did this sample come from him. He seems to be opened to making things right.

 

[Johnson513]

Well in that case brother, it looks like you got crap. Almost looks like test C. Def not 300mg/ml Test E that's for sure. Darius has been around a little bit, did this sample come from him. He seems to be opened to making things right.

Yeah... It came from him.
Sounds like he's gonna make it right... We'll see.
He seems like a solid dude though...

 

[ebkallday]

Yeah... It came from him.
Sounds like he's gonna make it right... We'll see.
He seems like a solid dude though...

Keep us updated my friend.

 

[Johnson513]

Keep us updated my friend.

Will do EBK

 

[msmith22]

Thanks Johnson for lm, defiantly keep us updated

 

[heady muscle]

Yeah... It came from him.
Sounds like he's gonna make it right... We'll see.
He seems like a solid dude though...

Bummer my friend, but it sounds as if you have a good handle on it with Darius. Hoping for the best.

 

[daledd]

I have the same test e 300, should i be worried?

 

[jackmeoff1]

Yeah... It came from him.
Sounds like he's gonna make it right... We'll see.
He seems like a solid dude though...

i get that Darius is a solid dude. Is he admitting to this being bad?

 

[daledd]

i get that Darius is a solid dude. Is he admitting to this being bad?

Is labmax accurate enough? Also, @Johnson513 did you start using the test?

 

[Johnson513]

i get that Darius is a solid dude. Is he admitting to this being bad?

Sorry brother, I don't know... He's sending me other gear on a $300 credit. I'm not sure if that's admission or just solid customer service or both... He never straight out told me that the gear was bad though. When I emailed him my original LM video (not this one), he said he wasn't too familiar with LM testing and he was going to be in contact with Pharmacom. I wanted to go to him first to see if anything would come if it before I posted. We went back and forth a few emails and eventually I got busy and the issue was put on the back burner. Then someone asked about Pharmacom one day here on MESO, so I posted a new labmax for people to come to their own conclusions... I dunno if I answered your question though.

 

[Johnson513]

Is labmax accurate enough? Also, @Johnson513 did you start using the test?

No, I didn't use it. After I get the replacements, I will test and post. If it's to my liking, I will pin that in March.

Is LM accurate enough? It's mainly a pass fail test only. Its supposedly used by LE to determine positive/neg for different drugs. IMO, I like it as a first line of testing with AAS, but I'm speaking for just me. I'd go to LM website and read what they have to say and then make a call that sits well with ya...

 

[big boi]

Thank u for the test Johnson 513

 

[bambamredbull]

I was about to place a order with the same guy. Any advice on that source

 

[daledd]

I was about to place a order with the same guy. Any advice on that source

Honestly ive been pretty satisfied, ive had my gear for a week now and im already seeing test side effects like acne well being increased libido more confident( first cycle so bear that in mind).
Beside that theres not much i can say, communication is good, shipping is fast and the gear is definately legit pharmacom. Im getting bloodworks in a month so ill be able to tell you more then.

 

[Pimppapa1977]

So what's the word