Maybe one day after I'm more established in this forum =]
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Post your Controversial Opinions here
- Thread starter Liter O' Test
- Start date
Okay fine. Since you replied to my deleted message at lightning speed..
My controversial opinion:
It is MY opinion that Covid 19 vaccines are not vaccines, but a dual-use military bioweapon technology.
The mRNA technology can be used to induce human cells to produce any foreign protein with the right modified RNA sequence. The sequences can be engineered and printed out via a computer, encapsulated into a thin wall of lipids and pushed into cells.
The technology was deployed to the public "at warp speed" without a lot of human testing and I believe we are witnessing a pharma-government disaster that has largely been covered up by media and government agencies. The technology could become very useful for terminal patients with cancer and other ailments, but i think it was pushed out too fast and there are a lot of people that have been injured.
My opinion got me banned from Facebook and YouTube for one year.
bigMoJo
Member
You got banned for that? I've heard much more conspiratorial "conspiracy theories." Anyway, question... why is this "dual use" bioweapon a "pharma-government diaster?"
The reason I use the term "bioweapon" and "dual-use" is because any protein can be produced by human cells using modified RNA. Think of the possibilities not only for consumer applications but for the military. The DARPA website has a program dedicated to this tech called Project ADEPT and it was funded pre-covid (https://www.darpa.mil/attachments/ADEPTVignetteFINAL.pdf). The Covid 19 vaccines are not traditional vaccines, but it is gene therapy. Not the same as the traditional jabs we got as kids.
To answer your other question, I believe the jabs elevate the probability of heart attacks and possibly cancers based on anecdotal reports from people I know in the medical field (nurses, actual doctors, etc), people I know that have taken the jab who now have poor health, newly published research, and various people I trust on social media. The US government also tried to hide the list of 1,273 possible adverse events related to these products from the public for 75 years (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf - pages 30-38). Other lawsuit outcomes that are highly suspicious. I could write a literal book about this topic but trying to keep my response simple here. I am not really trying to convince anyone that my opinion is correct.
So do I win the prize for most contraversial opinion? =]
Last edited:
Liter O' Test
Member
No but i find your innocence amusing
Innocence? What do you mean?
My research into this topic mostly started when I was just laying around recovering from an accident. Was also out of work and had a lot of time to burn. The new mRNA technology was also fascinating the more I read about it. I went down a huge rabbit hole and was surprised by what I had discovered.
My takeaway from the past 4 years of accumulated research on the topic is to never trust the government blindly about anything. Trust but verify. People trust the gov way too much and get lazy with research. And it's hard to trust doctors blindly because most doctors just regurgitate whatever the government says because healthcare has become largely centralized and bogged down by federal government red tape.
I fully accept that I'm probably an overly paranoid person. There is no way I was going to let some person in a random parking lot shove a 6 inch swab up my nose to test for covid. No fucking way lol. It's the same with the jabs. Not letting the government stick me with some DARPA mystery oil mixed up in some top secret lab. Especially when they mandated the shit on the population. Felt like I was living in a George Orwell horror movie that year.
Last edited:
Liter O' Test
Member
yeah i agree with you and youre not paranoid. not only does it have a "chip" in it to track but also could be an interface for different frequencies to affect our mood or behavior
Trenbolonetax
Well-known Member
bigMoJo
Member
Yeah, no.
But, I'm going to nominate you for the prize for best hand-job of the week. I feel fully stroked after reading 40 pages of what you think is a shred of evidence supporting this "conspiracy." "Blood Pressure Decreased" is on that "list of 1,273 possible adverse events." Is that an adverse event?
The only real adverse event here is that I just wasted 30 minutes reading that.
