PurplePandaLabs Raw source

[PandaRep]

Well, obviously I’m not trying to start an argument- however, even if I were to do that, I feel as if you would just brush it off as “fake news” too add, the purple panda website shows raws tests, BUT regardless of how pure they actually are, they are going to always make them in the 99% range. Because just like any business, you have to stretch the truth to make money

So how would our mass specs be stretching the truth?
So I get the exact same raws that anymore else would... Im on trt, and stock pile my Rx and use my home brew. It's brewed @5%+. 200mg/ml. My labs are EXACTLY the same as what my Rx labs are.

Now sure you can call me a shill, whatever you'd like, but the fact is there mountains of proof for 4 years that our raws are solid and no proof that they aren't.

So here's the deal, believe the reddit stuff. And don't buy our products. No one's forcing you. Buy from someone else please. The odds are we're drop shipping their raws also. You're not understanding our market share, if we were selling junk, the wheels would have long since fallen off.

 

[Villain]

Today’s raw powders are of impeccable quality. I’ve always felt anything above 96% purity is a great product.

Surely you jest my friend. Anything less than 99% will just be recorded on the website as 99% pure to make money

 

[cyrus888]

Because that's what unvetted forums work.
Do you know who that person is that said that ,do they have a trackable history? Are they a competing source under a false user name? Lab work? Bloodwork? And real proof? No...there's none. It's just some dude running his mouth because he either has an agenda or just wants to troll.

Bring me your proof that our raws are underdosed.
Not someone's mis-made home brew, testing that shows we have under dosed raws. From a credible testing source.

Mate, any schedule or plan shipping to China?

 

[Iron Vett]

Surely you jest my friend. Anything less than 99% will just be recorded on the website as 99% pure to make money

I actually had a discussion with @janoshik about the internal testing of pandas raws. I had asked him if he had ever done comparative testing on the same batches of panda raws. He had said he had done it many times. He knows the person that conducts pandas test and says he is a good tester. The only thing that he has seen is that the panda tests will be set up to come out with the best possible purity. But even that leaves little difference from what the actual purity to the results of panda tests.

 

[janoshik]

I actually had a discussion with @janoshik about the internal testing of pandas raws. I had asked him if he had ever done comparative testing on the same batches of panda raws. He had said he had done it many times. He knows the person that conducts pandas test and says he is a good tester. The only thing that he has seen is that the panda tests will be set up to come out with the best possible purity. But even that leaves little difference from what the actual purity to the results of panda tests.

Hey hey hey... I don't see myself calling that guy a good chemist other than that yeah

 

[Villain]

The only thing that he has seen is that the panda tests will be set up to come out with the best possible purity.

Hey hey hey... I don't see myself calling that guy a good chemist other than that yeah

What is meant by that quote from Iron Vett?

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Yeah dude, you were spot on with that assessment. Shit, I like panda and even if I didn't I'd still be saying the same shit.

I bet he hasn't even asked any of the testing sources what they think. Gee, wouldn't that be a good place to start, detective Connor? Thank God Mayberry doesn't depend on you to keep it safe.

 

[Connor 25257]

 

[janoshik]

What is meant by that quote from Iron Vett?

This is raw data of tren e I tested two days ago when you look at it at 340 nm:



This is when you take a look at 240 nm:


This is what happens when you take a look at 190 nm:



This is an example to illustrate a point. I figure it's easier this way then going onto long walls of text.

 

[Connor 25257]

I just wanted to share some screenshots. I also came across a website in regards to open source boards.....not a good look seeing Meso as unreliable

 

[Silentlemon1011]

I just wanted to share some screenshots. I also came across a website in regards to open source boards.....not a good look seeing Meso as unreliable

Good for you for at least posting some evidence of your opinion.

However, Meso being unreliable.
Nope
IMHO it's the only reliable one.

Most idiots, retards and cucks looking for spoonfeeding come here and get told to fuck off.

So Meso gets called "unreliable" because we tell then to go and buy from insane places to see if they do their research

Too bad they're too stupid to even get the joke

 

[ICD-HardThings]

I just wanted to share some screenshots. I also came across a website in regards to open source boards.....not a good look seeing Meso as unreliable

Well than take your ass onto wherever the hell it is you need be and get your deep web clear net shit somewhere else. This board is one of brotherhood and doesn’t need your childish game playing ass that probably didn’t even do an intro.

Quit cloggin up this thread and go over to BOP or SST and find the reliability your looking for and be a fucking shill.

And so you know this isn’t a source board it is a harm reduction board. And take your spoon with you!

 

[BroScientist]

The unfortunate thing with internet reviews is that you don't know the motivation of the poster. There are legit reviewers, idiots, dick riding shills, and oppo "fake gear" trolls. But answer me this, why would any source underdose gear by 50% while charging low prices? Why wouldn't they just charge 100% more and not cut the product? You would think anyone with an established brand would have more to lose by sending out cut products.

I could see there being an issue with sourcing appropriately pure raws, but I don't see a whole lot of danger in sources cutting the raws, maybe except on the very expensive stuff.

As to the TestE PIP, that was a known issue, everyone got shitty raws a while back and it was discussed here. I don't remember if people had their raws replaced or not.

At the end of the day, no one can guarantee you anything, you read and take your chances.

 

[Connor 25257]

Well than take your ass onto wherever the hell it is you need be and get your deep web clear net shit somewhere else. This board is one of brotherhood and doesn’t need your childish game playing ass that probably didn’t even do an intro.

Quit cloggin up this thread and go over to BOP or SST and find the reliability your looking for and be a fucking shill.

And so you know this isn’t a source board it is a harm reduction board.View attachment 126240 And take your spoon with you!

I’m just trying to save people from burning a hole in their pockets. I’ve been scammed before, I don’t want anyone having to go through that bs. Also, UGbodybuilding is the furthest thing from a source board. While I’m sure they have some idiots, I believe that for the most part, they are one of the best boards around. Just like them, I am a firm believer in never ordering from a website, as you’ll either get scammed or get junk. It’s best to buy from someone whom takes orders via email only. *protonmail of course*

 

[BroScientist]

@janoshik So which test is more trustworthy?

 

[ounick28]

View attachment 126228


This is raw data of tren e I tested two days ago when you look at it at 340 nm:

View attachment 126229

This is when you take a look at 240 nm:
View attachment 126231

This is what happens when you take a look at 190 nm:
View attachment 126238


This is an example to illustrate a point. I figure it's easier this way then going onto long walls of text.

@BroScientist I assume the lower frequency is more accurate and hence why the retention times are longer and their are more peaks in the test?

I literally just learned all my knowledge of this during a 10 minute google search, but I am wondering how do you identify which peak is what compound? I assume it has something to do with the unique retention volumes of each peak, but how to you tie that to a single compound with the almost infinite amount of possible compounds?

 

[janoshik]

@janoshik So which test is more trustworthy?

All the three reports are the same test. That was the point.

It was to illustrate that by changing a single parameter on a report (what to show on the graph) you can change the 'purity' percentage a whole lot and that the percentages shown on the graph are not necessarily the same as weight % of the actual compound in the sample. That's why purity testing requires very experienced chemist.

@BroScientist I assume the lower frequency is more accurate and hence why the retention times are longer and their are more peaks in the test?

I literally just learned all my knowledge of this during a 10 minute google search, but I am wondering how do you identify which peak is what compound? I assume it has something to do with the unique retention volumes of each peak, but how to you tie that to a single compound with the almost infinite amount of possible compounds?

No, it's the same test, the retention time of trenbolone enanthate is 6.695 minutes in all cases, if you notice. That's also an answer to your second and third question. Trenbolone enanthate can be identified in that graph by retention time compared to standard (in addition to other stuff). The only thing that is changed is showing different wavelength on the graph.

 

[ICD-HardThings]

I’m just trying to save people from burning a hole in their pockets. I’ve been scammed before, I don’t want anyone having to go through that bs. Also, UGbodybuilding is the furthest thing from a source board. While I’m sure they have some idiots, I believe that for the most part, they are one of the best boards around. Just like them, I am a firm believer in never ordering from a website, as you’ll either get scammed or get junk. It’s best to buy from someone whom takes orders via email only. *protonmail of course*

We already have our village idiot. Fuck @balco and don’t have room for another so please find a board that has a slot to fill.

 

[Iron Vett]

What is meant by that quote from Iron Vett?

@janoshik testing confirmed that the panda testing was indeed good

 

[janoshik]

@janoshik testing confirmed that the panda testing was indeed good

Yeah. The wavelength choice is probably for simplicity sake.