- False accusation made without evidence. Dishonest. Interesting that you would use dishonest tactics so quickly, when this was my first interaction with you, and even tried to offer suggestions of how to undertake harm reduction while minimizing costs. Dishonesty is not a good look. You might want to do better.
- Ok, good, we've established that you consider a 150%+ overdose in your tablets to be of no concern to you. This is in direct contrast to anyone that actually cares about good quality.
So, we've now established:
1. Qingdao Sigma Chemical has an extremely sub-standard approach to ensuring product quality.
2. Even when the empirical evidence shows you have a very low-quality batch, you take no action to mitigate the risk to your customers.
3. You use dishonest rhetorical tactics to try and distract from the fact that you are a low-quality operation willing to put your customers at risk.
I'm not sure what's worse, your lack of concern for quality and your customers, or your dishonesty.