Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Anyone mind helping me figure out which vials are what? I received an order today but I think the boxes were mislabeled and I’m an idiot and pulled everything out before doubt checking them thinking there might be a hint on the vials, first qsc order so I probably made some big mistakes lol
Looking closely, one thing that may help narrow it down a bit more if you are desperate. The MENT, MAS P should be a pretty painless inject. The Primo 200 and DHB usually give a more painful inject with most reporting DHB a bit more so. The sustanon can vary. I have seen painless sustanon, and I have had sustanon that hurts. Not perfect, but at least increase your odds slightly.
 
Looking closely, one thing that may help narrow it down a bit more if you are desperate. The MENT, MAS P should be a pretty painless inject. The Primo 200 and DHB usually give a more painful inject with most reporting DHB a bit more so. The sustanon can vary. I have seen painless sustanon, and I have had sustanon that hurts. Not perfect, but at least increase your odds slightly.
I find mast P is incredibly easy to draw with a 28g slin pin, too compared to more viscous oils.
 
Looking closely, one thing that may help narrow it down a bit more if you are desperate. The MENT, MAS P should be a pretty painless inject. The Primo 200 and DHB usually give a more painful inject with most reporting DHB a bit more so. The sustanon can vary. I have seen painless sustanon, and I have had sustanon that hurts. Not perfect, but at least increase your odds slightly.
Primo 200 Is pipless from QSC most of the time or super mild. The DHB I doubt it will be pipless quite the opposite
 
Primo 200 Is pipless from QSC most of the time or super mild. The DHB I doubt it will be pipless quite the opposite
For me, the primo 200 always leaves a bit of lump. Nothing crazy, but not as smooth as EQ, mast, etc. DHB I haven't tried but yeah definitely gonna give bad PIP as far as I understand.
 
For me, the primo 200 always leaves a bit of lump. Nothing crazy, but not as smooth as EQ, mast, etc. DHB I haven't tried but yeah definitely gonna give bad PIP as far as I understand.
For me it depends and it's really random and depends on the site. Just did 2ml primo 200 left glute yesterday evening and right now I can't feel a thing. Same if I inject into the VG. Zero.

PIP is sometime very subjective, can vary from person to person. I have refiltered the oil tho. Maybe it would have not changed the outcome but I still did.
 
For me it depends and it's really random and depends on the site. Just did 2ml primo 200 left glute yesterday evening and right now I can't feel a thing. Same if I inject into the VG. Zero.

PIP is sometime very subjective, can vary from person to person. I have refiltered the oil tho. Maybe it would have not changed the outcome but I still did.
This too, lol. Super subjective and individual. I didn’t refilter. Maybe that is my issue!
 
This too, lol. Super subjective and individual. I didn’t refilter. Maybe that is my issue!

While I'm hesitant to give "feels" assessments of anything, especially broad generalizations, in general, AAS oil or peptide, I've found a decrease in PIP post filtration.

In some instances, the difference was so dramatic, I had to check the tech literature to reassure myself I wasn't somehow removing active ingredient by using the wrong type of filter (not a concern with oils, only peptides).
 
On the left is a 12iu vial. On the right is a 36iu vial from QSC.

Both test “pure,” so how can this be?
The white stuff you see is mostly Mannitol, a filler/excipient. The same amount of Mannitol is used for all GH concentrations. The GH is only between 4 and 12mg for those stated IU amounts, which is a tiny bit of powder. Hence, the pucks basically look identical.

See below for how much 1mg of powder looks like:
1730814688078.webp
 
While I'm hesitant to give "feels" assessments of anything, especially broad generalizations, in general, AAS oil or peptide, I've found a decrease in PIP post filtration.

In some instances, the difference was so dramatic, I had to check the tech literature to reassure myself I wasn't somehow removing active ingredient by using the wrong type of filter (not a concern with oils, only peptides).
Gosh darn it. I may just be convinced. Ghoul, can you please link me to your thread or comment explaining what to acquire to do this? Would a vial spike suffice or should I just go for a syringe filter?

Sorry I’m being lazy and asking.
 
The white stuff you see is mostly Mannitol, a filler/excipient. The same amount of Mannitol is used for all GH concentrations. The GH is only between 4 and 12mg for those stated IU amounts, which is a tiny bit of powder. Hence, the pucks basically look identical.

See below for how much 1mg of powder looks like:
View attachment 301580
Thanks for that. I had no idea there was ever any filler.
 
View attachment 301578

On the left is a 12iu vial. On the right is a 36iu vial from QSC.

Both test “pure,” so how can this be?

What is wrong with the 36iu vial?!

He's concerned it's the same volume.

Filler explains the volume difference. It's not that there's less gh in one, one just has more filler

We should probobly stop referring to excipients as "filler", which implies something that's inert. These ingredients are an important part of the drug's "recipe", and perform a number of important functions. Antioxodants, anti-aggregation, PH adjusters, etc. Some can cause side effects in certain individuals.

If there are significant differences between pharma and UGL, this could be where a lot of that difference lies.

While we have bigger fish to fry, knowing the excipient "recipe" being used should be standard. Would you use an AAS with mystery ingredients?. We know what the pharma companies are using. They vary from company to company, but all excipient ingredients are listed in the box.

These things are being injected into our bodies, so I don't think it's unreasonable to expect them to be disclosed. I believe Tracy has done this once or twice on request.
 
Back
Top