Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

[Keilani]

Oh man, it's been a while since some rando I've never interacted with has tried his hand at amateur psychoanalysis in an attempt to insult me.

My time is my own, unlike yours, so you can be forgiven for being unable to comprehend how I can post whenever the mood strikes without a paycheck signer breathing down my neck.

I'm not a "kid", but based on the low quality of your posts, I know what you (and your brother) are.

Late middle aged losers, embittered from careers that have peaked out at low value jobs where you eke out a living measured by ticks on a time clock.

Do me a favor. When the inevitable moment comes that you feel a sudden sharp pain in your chest, in those last moments, recall my words.

You didn't live a fraction of the life that you could've. Your entire petty existence was squandered making other, better people prosperous.

And that's how it should be. Shit sinks to the bottom of life's septic tank.

Bravo

 

[ThreeSix]

But @Ghoul… All the forum guys told me “Pharma gets it from the same factories the UGLs do”! Are you saying they were… *gasp*… Wrong?!

I source my testosterone via a doctor from a pharmacy in central EU and we are all out of testosterone as of lately, since China closed their factories. Go figure.

 

[Vyvynette]

Is 20% extra fres for insurance is the new standard here? Getting pricier and pricier by the day

 

[vizzorz]

Is 20% extra fres for insurance is the new standard here? Getting pricier and pricier by the day

Yeah for international packs

 

[Dirthand]

Is 20% extra fres for insurance is the new standard here? Getting pricier and pricier by the day

I can't say for sure but I beleive if you are from Canada it's been like that since forever.. but since I'm not I am only speculating!!

 

[Esteronez]

where can I find pricelist?

 

[eggrollfever]

UniUni, may just be a west coast thing

Got Uni in the northeast recently as well. I would definitely prefer USPS, at least you know what to expect with them.

 

[Dirthand]

where can I find pricelist?

QSC TG Channel

QSC announcement Channel

t.me

 

[DugPrime]

Is 20% extra fres for insurance is the new standard here? Getting pricier and pricier by the day

I never get asked to pay an extra fee for insurance.

 

[Juiced_lizard]

I never get asked to pay an extra fee for insurance.

I believe it depends on the country it’s getting shipped too.

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

 

[Clover 0080]

lol ya forsure u can order drugs on probation forsure the same thing as state laws and not like breaking federal laws on probation... Jesus the brain power here sometimes.

No one is coming to your door over a personal supply of steroids/weightloss drugs, etc. lol

 

[readalot]

I don’t understand your request here, nor the interest.
You’re looking for funding something that has nothing to do with Q samples or have an interest back for my sales, right?

Thanks for running the test and sharing the results. Would be great to drill down on the -ene question in the raw so results aren't diluted by other stuff in the finished product. That's why I am organizing a group buy for an -ene standard so we can run at various ratios with API to determine if the -ene peak is properly resolved from the API peak for Test C and Test E. If it isn't them there are some Test raws on the market that are quite impure. That's what the GCMS testing I had done with a vendor suggests.

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

Test Decanoate finished oils results.

An extra GCMS Enhanced testing was added due to suspicions on the quality of raws, tested 90.16% by Deadbeef:

D

Thread 'QSC low purity test decanoate raws'

Dec 28, 2024

Response from Tracy when emailed about it:

Hello, 90% is acceptable. No replacement. Not all batchs will be perfect, some will be +98%, some will be lower, it's the principle of raw powders, so you test them and adjust your brews based on purity results, it's not like if it was contaminated with some other steroid.

• deadbeef
• Replies: 157
• Forum: Analytical Lab Testing

• 
• 

The finished oil was brewed earlier, before his test, assuming the purity is 99%.

The HPLC finished results ended up accurately dosed.



GCMS testing shows no contamination.

The lines 2 and 3 are to be ignore, because it's from Janoshik previous GCMS test of another sample.
17.beta.-Acetoxyandrosta-4,6-dien-3-one is a common impurity found in testosterone raws and other steroids.

The following molecules are MCT constituents:
Glycerol tricaprylate.
2-(Decanoyloxy)propane-1,3-diyl dioctanoate.
3-(Octanoyloxy)propane-1,2-diyl bis(decanoate).
Decanoic acid, 1,2,3-propanetriyl ester.

 

[readalot]

Test Decanoate finished oils results.

An extra GCMS Enhanced testing was added due to suspicions on the quality of raws, tested 90.16% by Deadbeef:

D

Thread 'QSC low purity test decanoate raws'

Dec 28, 2024

Response from Tracy when emailed about it:

Hello, 90% is acceptable. No replacement. Not all batchs will be perfect, some will be +98%, some will be lower, it's the principle of raw powders, so you test them and adjust your brews based on purity results, it's not like if it was contaminated with some other steroid.

• deadbeef
• Replies: 157
• Forum: Analytical Lab Testing

• 
• 

The finished oil was brewed earlier, before his test, assuming the purity is 99%.

The HPLC finished results ended up accurately dosed.

View attachment 310984

GCMS testing shows no contamination.

The lines 2 and 3 are to be ignore, because it's from Janoshik previous GCMS test of another sample.
17.beta.-Acetoxyandrosta-4,6-dien-3-one is a common impurity found in testosterone raws and other steroids.

The following molecules are MCT constituents:
Glycerol tricaprylate.
2-(Decanoyloxy)propane-1,3-diyl dioctanoate.
3-(Octanoyloxy)propane-1,2-diyl bis(decanoate).
Decanoic acid, 1,2,3-propanetriyl ester.

View attachment 310989
View attachment 310990
View attachment 310991
View attachment 310992

To confirm, that's GCMS of finished oil. Well done. Testing the raws with GCMS even more useful (no dilution with other stuff you add to make finished product).

Very useful tool. Now we need to put the question on Test C and Test E raws to bed. That's where the reference standard for -ene impurity becomes critical. Will allow determination if that impurity is "invisible" to HPLC (vs API).

 

[Cereal masturbator]

Test Decanoate finished oils results.

An extra GCMS Enhanced testing was added due to suspicions on the quality of raws, tested 90.16% by Deadbeef:

D

Thread 'QSC low purity test decanoate raws'

Dec 28, 2024

Response from Tracy when emailed about it:

Hello, 90% is acceptable. No replacement. Not all batchs will be perfect, some will be +98%, some will be lower, it's the principle of raw powders, so you test them and adjust your brews based on purity results, it's not like if it was contaminated with some other steroid.

• deadbeef
• Replies: 157
• Forum: Analytical Lab Testing

• 
• 

The finished oil was brewed earlier, before his test, assuming the purity is 99%.

The HPLC finished results ended up accurately dosed.

View attachment 310984

GCMS testing shows no contamination.

The lines 2 and 3 are to be ignore, because it's from Janoshik previous GCMS test of another sample.
17.beta.-Acetoxyandrosta-4,6-dien-3-one is a common impurity found in testosterone raws and other steroids.

The following molecules are MCT constituents:
Glycerol tricaprylate.
2-(Decanoyloxy)propane-1,3-diyl dioctanoate.
3-(Octanoyloxy)propane-1,2-diyl bis(decanoate).
Decanoic acid, 1,2,3-propanetriyl ester.

View attachment 310989
View attachment 310990
View attachment 310991
View attachment 310992

I used to leave cash in someone’s bag in the gym and he’d drop the gear In my bag in the changing room, now we get whatever the fuck these graphs are with our order …. As bob Dylan wrote, the times they are a changing

 

[readalot]

I used to leave cash in someone’s bag in the gym and he’d drop the gear In my bag in the changing room, now we get whatever the fuck these graphs are with our order …. As bob Dylan wrote, the times they are a changing

You are welcome.

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

To confirm, that's GCMS of finished oil. Well done. Testing the raws with GCMS even more useful (no dilution with other stuff you add to make finished product).

Very useful tool. Now we need to put the question on Test C and Test E raws to bed. That's where the reference standard for -ene impurity becomes critical. Will allow determination if that impurity is "invisible" to HPLC (vs API).

Good luck with that.
QSC will always continue to perform whatever testing is need to advertise its products, and whenever there is an interest that brings a return of investment.
I am sure when the interest in your question one day raises, you'll see more participants in the subject.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Test Decanoate finished oils results.

An extra GCMS Enhanced testing was added due to suspicions on the quality of raws, tested 90.16% by Deadbeef:

D

Thread 'QSC low purity test decanoate raws'

Dec 28, 2024

Response from Tracy when emailed about it:

Hello, 90% is acceptable. No replacement. Not all batchs will be perfect, some will be +98%, some will be lower, it's the principle of raw powders, so you test them and adjust your brews based on purity results, it's not like if it was contaminated with some other steroid.

• deadbeef
• Replies: 157
• Forum: Analytical Lab Testing

• 
• 

The finished oil was brewed earlier, before his test, assuming the purity is 99%.

The HPLC finished results ended up accurately dosed.

View attachment 310984

GCMS testing shows no contamination.

The lines 2 and 3 are to be ignore, because it's from Janoshik previous GCMS test of another sample.
17.beta.-Acetoxyandrosta-4,6-dien-3-one is a common impurity found in testosterone raws and other steroids.

The following molecules are MCT constituents:
Glycerol tricaprylate.
2-(Decanoyloxy)propane-1,3-diyl dioctanoate.
3-(Octanoyloxy)propane-1,2-diyl bis(decanoate).
Decanoic acid, 1,2,3-propanetriyl ester.

View attachment 310989
View attachment 310990
View attachment 310991
View attachment 310992

I don't understand.

Either

- the HPLC test of the raws (90% purity) is correct

Or

- The GCMS test of the oil (no impurities corresponding to the 10% of the weight of the raws detected) is correct

I do not see how both tests could be correct. Unless the impurity detected in the HPLC somehow disappeared in the brewing process (like water evaporating).

Help a brotha out here

 

[readalot]

I don't understand.

Either

- the HPLC test of the raws (90% purity) is correct

Or

- The GCMS test of the oil (no impurities corresponding to the 10% of the weight of the raws detected) is correct

I do not see how both tests could be correct. Unless the impurity detected in the HPLC somehow disappeared in the brewing process (like water evaporating).

Help a brotha out here

Finally getting some interest in this important topic. I will be reading with keen enjoyment. Thanks for asking the questions.

Lots of degrees of freedom in there to nail the answers down.