IronJohnDoe
Member
It was you! LolTechnically I still am a brother even with a gyna
Why couldn't you be a sister?
Now I can't mistake you with your updated avi, looking great by the way Sister!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was you! LolTechnically I still am a brother even with a gyna
My bad, then I don't want to take away anything from the new lady.
Is not the first time I call a she a he in this forum.
Last time I called a lady "brother" (in my defence she had a clover as an avi)
That was definitely a unique, unforgettable introduction. Glad it was resolved quickly (I totally didn't believe you were a separate person for about 15 minutes after your explanation...just sobered up from the meth...lol)I remember when I was a lurker not able to post. And then one day some drunk lunatic came on here randomly picking my name and saying I was his wife and a rep for tracy. Got me banned by Tracy and I couldnt even defend myself. Im assuming he just looked at all the users currently online and picked my name but I was sitting here fuming not able to even say a word lol. Luckily I was able to get myself unbanned the next day
We may have a different understanding of a term 'reasoning'. If you read the article you just quoted (or make chat summarize it), you'll find that it has nothing to do with mathematical computations. It's all about chain of thought and validating it's conclusions. I still stand by my original statement - LLMs can't count. They may call plugins or guess the result, but they cannot count.In your example it fails at self knowledge, not math. Here’s a description of the capability and how it is distinct from the 4o model:
In my experience it works quite well. Like any of these tools, it doesn’t absolve one from reasoning and verification, but it certainly accelerates certain activities.
It is quite good at statistics and I am not. In that sense I find it to be beneficial.
you'll find that it has nothing to do with mathematical computations. It's all about chain of thought and validating it's conclusions
It's all about chain of thought and validating it's conclusions. I still stand by my original statement - LLMs can't count. They may call plugins or guess the result, but they cannot count.
Good to know. Please educate me when you get a chance. Thanks.You are missing quite a lot because you are wrong about everything here.
Well yeah… it cost me 5 vials of trenJoined Wed. 8 posts. Lemme guess? You paid the upgrade fee?
Same. The focus is AMAZING (for someone with ADHD)Kinda funny you mention that ... for me personally I think i am more of an asshole/ smart ass off tren than when on tren.. When on tren to be way to serious and extremely focused.
Not saying i though you were being a smart ass or an asshole btw
I think we have the same wife. lolI tell ya, I’m liking this ChatGPT fella. He’s the opposite of my wife. She doesn’t compliment my IQ, at all.
Read The Drunkard's Walk by Leonard MlodinowProbability and Statistics is no joke, some of the dullest reading I have encountered.
I had to drop it on my first attempt.
Would you call me a nerd if I said that actually sounds interesting? They have it as a book on tape too!Same. The focus is AMAZING (for someone with ADHD)
I think we have the same wife. lol
Read The Drunkard's Walk by Leonard Mlodinow
ThanksI got different oils from QSC and from everything i had different batches. Sometimes the color was slightly different between batches. All was legit.
How do you guys cook lobster
Do you snort that partSplit it in half lengthwise and on the grill. Or if you're less adventurous, boiled whole.
Rock paper scissors for who gets the tomalley.
No you gotta dump truck it straight to the bloodstream of the anusDo you snort that part
Hand stand anus chuggingNo you gotta dump truck it straight to the bloodstream of the anus
"Performance" as in making less mistakes when guessing the answer. It still doesn't count or compute. It does its best to guess the correct answer using some learned answers. Often it is correct. But since it doesn't do real math without plugins, it's important to verify it's results. LLMs are known to hallucinate with realistic responses which may lead to false sense of security.Nothing? It describes how it has improved performance over 4o in a math benchmark. It wasn’t intended to prove anything other than the distinction between it and previous models. I’ve read elsewhere that some of the RL done was specifically intended to increase performance in mathematics.
Do you snort that part
No you gotta dump truck it straight to the bloodstream of the anus
idk its giving me the same vibes you get when you look in the kitchen sink strainer after washnig the dishes. Yucky little treatDo whatever but at least save a little to eat. It's delicious.
