Qingdao Sigma HPLC testing

I can agree to disagree and respect your argument. I’m good. We will let Millard decide if this presents a risk to the community at large.

I have emailed the compromised users I could find. So they are aware. My primary interest is in protecting people in our community.

Will let them decide their path forward.
agreed.
I just felt that in the last few weeks sources try to fuck each other over every single issue in despair of competition and ive thought you were another source who created a second handle to fuck a competitor
 
agreed.
I just felt that in the last few weeks sources try to fuck each other over every single issue in despair of competition and ive thought you were another source who created a second handle to fuck a competitor
That I get entirely.
 
no, unfortunately i dont get you.
go to http://www.janoshik.com/verify (www.janoshik.com/verify), insert the task number and the key which are shown in the post made by the user himself and you will see the Mail address.
of course the source made me mistake not to take the ones posted by the user, this is correct, but nevertheless he didnt dox him if you ask me.
All these labs has been shared by the customers in public, so if someone of them do not agree with this, I can prove when and where it was shared easily.
I never share private labs, if it was so, you will have at least 200 extra lab tests here.
 
I think it's more up to every customer who think I shared the data without their permission to prove how did get it if it wasn't public. All these labs have been posted either in lab testing forum, or our 700 pages thread, with shared task number and key. If some of them do not feel confortable about it I have no problem that his lab can be removed but as far as I know all of them are happy regular customers who will be glad sharing these labs and most of them got compensation for posting them in public.
What you think you should do and what you are required to do in this situation are not the same.
 
The lab test can be removed, and I will apologize for the mistake, but since I am pretty sure I didn't get any of those in private, I can 100% prove how these were posted in public.
I have removed the reports with unredacted email addresses as a security precaution without prejudice. Since the issue has been raised that you may have posted member email addresses without their permission, you can repost these lab reports only if you can prove (with a URL to the original post containing the lab report) that the email addresses are already disclosed in the public domain by the member(s)
 
Do you realize you just Doxed a shit ton of your client’s emails by being lazy and stupid and not removing their contact information?

Not all of them are labs you idiot.

This is exactly what your critics hate about you. Good product, horrible common sense, protection protocols and ZERO CLIENT PROTECTION OR CARE.

@Liska and others are right.

You are a threat to the community. You stupidly talk about your shipping methods openly and now blatantly post your clients emails on the lab reports they trusted you with.

@Millard this has got to be handled, addressed with this idiot rep and the post revealing client emails removed.

This behavior has to violate community protocols.
You made an alt account just to post this?
You are very lame
 
I can agree to disagree and respect your argument. I’m good. We will let Millard decide if this presents a risk to the community at large.

I have emailed the compromised users I could find. So they are aware. My primary interest is in protecting people in our community.

Will let them decide their path forward.
jesus christ you're an insufferable cunt. Please take your bullshit elsewhere. Clearly no one else here cares.
 
So now we start pointing fingers at users arbitrarily. You see my point? Obviously this is not my main profile. That doesn’t mean I’m a client. Be careful doing that to these people.

It is possible the users didn’t know this. (So your pointing it out further doxxed them) This whole thread needs to be locked and removed for security of the community.

You get my point in all this? It is one thing for a user to mistakenly doxx himself/herself, it is entirely a different thing for a source to do it.

If QSC had had the reaction of immediately rectifying the information mistake on his/her part I would have been the first to recognize this and laud the integrity.

This source is dangerous in that he/she won’t ever admit mistakes and needs to re-evaluate priorities. (Which should be client confidentiality)
Why not post from original account then mister community?
 
QSC had my permission to use the lab test I did on the custom order TRT+ blend that has now become a part of their standard list. The rep actually contacted me after I posted the result (I openly posted it in the testing forum) to confirm it was OK to reference.

Link...
 
Top