Readalots Enhanced Testing

[Ateam2023]

There are a zillion people paying compound pharmacies $250 per bottle of test C from these TRT clinics.

How can you think people won't pony up an extra $5 for the extra piece of mind?

There is a reason stores like Whole Foods exist and are extremely profitable. People actually like paying more if they feel they get a better product.

The constant pessimism from you guys is impressive. Let these vendors give it a shot and let the market decide.

its simply "human nature" to NOT want to pay more for ANYTHING, Merely an observation , time will tell i guess,,,,

 

[narta]

You were asked when test c caused crippling pip, you responded with your tests

You are such a joke dude

He tries to stay relevant. Stop responding, he will quote himself every other day as he does in every other thread, trying to keep exposure for himself and ultimately, full of frustration that no one

will have a tamper tantrum and get banned in the process as it happened on all the other forums he participated and ultimately relapse with his other vices due to depression.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

He tries to stay relevant. Stop responding, he will quote himself every other day as he does in every other thread, trying to keep exposure for himself and ultimately, full of frustration that no one

You are right. I noticed he does that if he isnt getting any attention

 

[readalot]

and ultimately relapse with his other vices

The forums and AAS are the only ones. I promise.

Bye! Let's see how long I am on ignore this time.

You got better stuff to do.

 

[readalot]

You are right.

Bye.

 

[keenpen]

Finally, the knuckle draggers are gone.

Keep up the good work, readalot. Premium people want premium products!

 

[iris]

@narta

as it happened on all the other forums he participated and ultimately relapse with his other vices due to depression.

Narta, this is not nice.
Whatever this is, just throwing it in someone's face (and for what?) is really uncalled for.
Call him a dickhead, but stuff like this, no.

I missed all this bits and bobs from yesterday.
Lots of messages.

Could you, please, give me a little summary of this test cyp situation, if you don't mind? Is it about impurities or what?
I only saw up to where test e was mentioned.

Yes, call me lazy pos, but just this for me, please.
If you don't mind, of course.
Thank you.

 

[readalot]

Whatever this is

Made up BS when you have nothing else to grasp on to. My departure from other forums well documented and unfortunate when my presence interferes with forum's cash flow. That I'm here still is a credit to Millard and Meso. Tells you what you need to know.

Ad hominem trash common to forums.

 

[iris]

Made up BS when you have nothing else to grasp on to. My departure from other forums well documented and unfortunate when my presence interferes with forum's cash flow. That I'm here still is a credit to Millard and Meso. Tells you what you need to know.

Ad hominem trash common to forums.

Sometimes, stuff is written in haste, in a way that is not really meant.
I am sure it is the case with that, above.
I think that Narta has, so far, engaged with you in a rational way, whereas many others have just been intent in being sarcastic and offensive to your person.

Although I didn't particularly like that bit, I think he usually explains his point of view in a way that is fair.
If you are passionate about making your views known, so is he.


I am still waiting for my little summary when he has time...

 

[readalot]

I think that Narta has, so far, engaged with you in a rational way

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 5:57 AM

Would you like to pitch in with me to answer the -ene variant question on the Test ester raws? You been following that? Thoughts?

Test E is the only raw that suffers from that.

Uh, no. The work described in this very thread indicates Test Cyp also same issue.

Wait for it...

Test Cyp has crippling pip? Since when?

You are helpless...

Test E has crippling pip for some reason, maybe because they changed the procedure. So everyone goes for Test C nowdays. You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about...

• readalot

• 

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 6:00 AM

You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about some isomere in Test C.

Whoops, should have put this one in there too.

Have a great week.

• readalot

• 

 

[iris]

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 5:57 AM

Would you like to pitch in with me to answer the -ene variant question on the Test ester raws? You been following that? Thoughts?

Test E is the only raw that suffers from that.

Uh, no. The work described in this very thread indicates Test Cyp also same issue.

Wait for it...

Test Cyp has crippling pip? Since when?

You are helpless...

Test E has crippling pip for some reason, maybe because they changed the procedure. So everyone goes for Test C nowdays. You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about...

• readalot

• 

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 6:00 AM

You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about some isomere in Test C.

Whoops, should have put this one in there too.

Have a great week.

• readalot

• 

OK, like I said I have missed all that.

Can you, please, explain to me what HE is missing about this, as far as you are concerned.
You are referring to test cyp related pip that is linked to raws impurities.
He says it is not the case, it is just related to test e.
Is that it?

 

[readalot]

OK, like I said I have missed all that.

Can you, please, explain to me what HE is missing about this, as far as you are concerned.
You are referring to test cyp related pip that is linked to raws impurities.
He says it is not the case, it is just related to test e.
Is that it?

Conflating PIP with the presence of what appears to be significant contamination of some Test Cyp and Test E raws with -ene impurities (based on GCMS results). Read the exchange carefully if interested. It's a subtle switch.

And we all agree we have no idea what causes the reported PIP on some Test E products. So because there is no reported PIP on Test C then the GCMS is irrelevant to the question I originally posed? The question was exactly that....what do you think about the -ene impurities in the Test ester raws.

Around in circles.

So far not many are interested in the implications of a false positive on HPLC purity.

 

[iris]

Uh, no. The work described in this very thread indicates Test Cyp also same issue.

irrelevant

So far not many are interested in the implications of a false positive on HPLC purity.

Yes.
OK, so you were referring to the impurities and he was referring to those in relation to test e pip.
I read it as a misunderstanding of what was being pointed at, with regards to test c:
You reporting those impurities in test c = pip with that too, which was not the case.

I understand that Narta regards the impurities in test cyp are irrelevant, as they are inconsequential .
So, yes, there is no interest in this, unless users report problems with injecting the substance, like they do with test e.
Don't know if this is how he means it, exactly.
But I don't think your results were denied. Just deemed irrelevant to users.

 

[readalot]

Just deemed irrelevant to users.

Understandable. Should answer that open question which would take some more heroics. If folks finally understood that their 200 mg/ml Test Cyp (as tested by HPLC) was actually 170 mg/ml, that might be pertinent. Still a hypothesis at this point. Jano not interested in chasing down any further. Thanks for your interest.

 

[readalot]

You reporting those impurities in test c = pip with that too, which was not the case.

Hopefully a misunderstanding given the forum medium. But all the hate and willful nastiness gives me some hesitation.

 

[iris]

Hopefully a misunderstanding given the forum medium. But all the hate and willful nastiness gives me some hesitation.

Yes.
Narta is not nasty.
Just caliente

 

[iris]

Thank you and sorry about all the questions.
I wanted to understand what you guys were saying but fell behind.
Plus I am very thick with all this, so thanks for the patience

 

[Grey Spartan]

the vast majority of people "don't want to pay extra" for ANYTHING,,, ,, cars , food , taxes, and i imagine it'll be that way for steroids,,,

I will have to disagree. Look at all the people with iPhones and Apple products. Imagine if an underground source could get an occult following like Apple. They could remake the Apple commercial with the guy in a suit representing Windiows and the "cool kid" representing Apple. They would have the jacked knuckle dragger represent other UGL's and a skinny jeaned, oil filtering, PIP and side effect scared and somewhat jacked dude/chick/they them representing them. They could pitch advanced testing from raw to vial with the slogan "think different". Billions they would make I tell ya!!

 

[Millard]

TIL there is no need for lab testing of black market AAS because:

(1) There are no major problems with the products;
(2) Yet even if lab tests confirmed that there are no major problems, there is no guarantee that products I receive won't have problems; and
(3) If lab tests did actually find major problems, there is nothing we could do anyway.

Thanks @narta and @Spaceman Spiff

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

TIL there is no need for lab testing of black market AAS because:

(1) There are no major problems with the products;
(2) Yet even if lab tests confirmed that there are no major problems, there is no guarantee that products I receive won't have problems; and
(3) If lab tests did actually find major problems, there is nothing we could do anyway.

Thanks @narta and @Spaceman Spiff

We didnt say there is no need for testing the product. As you know, I do send quite a bit of stuff for testing to Jano. I post majority of my test results to share with people here. I didn't have to post anything, and I could keep the results to myself.

1. It's not that we said there are no problems with the product. With HPLC testing, we can check for the major issues that are coming across with the product, purity. As we know EQ, DECA are big ones to look out for. For the most popular anabolics, We haven't seen major problems with the products, but I am not saying nobody should test it.

2. Yes, I agree with this. You never know if you the next batch will have issues. OR if the raws will come from the same manufacturer. Most of these "Manufacturers" are drop shippers and utilize different companies. I have had 2 sets of raws from the same manufacturer that clearly look different

3. With HPLC testing we can get refund on the product. the small little detail of GCMS we need to know what we are looking for. What are we are we going to do? Refuse to purchase the product from the manufacturer? It is so hard to figure out what each of the impurities are.
While there is strength in numbers, Meso is hardly even 5% of the majority of the population of AAS users.


The most recent argument with Readalot was completely based off of asking if Test C causes Crippling PIP, he proceeds to send a report that is irrelevant as pain is subjective data. Then he asks if we are on drugs or if our anabolics are altering our train of thought.