sade's MAIS case

EasyRider

New Member
I always had symtpoms of low T before roids it's just the ED hit me after the cycle.

I never checked what my levels were before touching Testosterone Enanthate but I suspect that they were very high, like 1200+. These are the levels that men with MAIS have and I took Test E for 9 months which is extreme abuse and they must have lowered them to where they are now. 879, 844 etc... I always had symptoms of Low T such as depression, difficulty concentrating, lower libido than most males etc... I could always get erections on demand but sometimes lost them upon penetration.

I always lacked confidence with women because I was skinny build and couldn't gain muscle by working out and eating 3000+ calories a day which is the reason I took 500mg Testosterone Enanthate for 9 months. I only gained a few pounds from that cycle even though I was working out 3 - 4 times a week and eating plenty clean foods, around 2 gram protein per pound of bodyweight and like I said earlier; 3000+ calories every day. I was surprised when I didn't put much mass on like other guys and my training partner and best friend.

I always knew that something was wrong.

Something just doesn't seem to be right here.

Does anyone else find this MAIS diagnosis based on T x LH kinda fishy considering roids background at a young age?

Something baffles me here-- you're not being objective, all issues you listed as low testosterone signs may have nothing to do with it.

1) You never new your levels before roids, it's just a speculation.

2) Testosterone 800 is not really high or abnormal.

3) Depression, concentration problems, lower libido than most males, confidence with women are not exactly the signs of sex hormones problems. There are many introverted / melancholic / asthenic / ectomorphs / boyish / ADD folks out there, but it doesn't mean treatment with testosterone will make them the opposite of what they are. These things simply have nothing to do with TRT and are not cured by it. All that can be referred to general constitutional health.

4) What real symptoms of low T did you have-- in that age that would be developmental issues. If before roids you had normal puberty (maybe later than some people, but still in normal timeframe), secondary sex characteristics development, no boobs, normal penis length, public hair development, in other words you were developing normally-- if this is true, that means you were normal! It would mean hormones worked. E.g. were you the least masculine in school, college etc? Did you have women's public hair pattern? Is it even possible to to have AIS if you never had real developmental issues?

5) The only thing to support MAIS theory is you high LH. Are you also infertile, have azoospermia?

6) What about AR gene testing, all point of AIS is malfunctioning receptor, are you going to confirm that?

So, why I'm skeptical, interested and saying all that, this is because:

1) I have similar story, EXCEPT my LH is normal (however my test is up to 1000ng/ml and free test is 30% higher than normal), so I don't qualify for MAIS by simple LH x T test, however all issues are there. It does mean that it's not AIS causing problems in similar situation and that in your case it MAY BE not AIS as well. There's definitely something else may be involved.

2) I too "always knew that something was wrong", however I now realize it really wasn't-- all real problems worth attention started after steroid use. It doesn't mean I didn't have weak hormonal system that could be easily disturbed, but not MAIS by any stretch.

3) You're too quick to use really subjective arguments and jump to conclusions which make me think you're not willing to be objective, just want to rush with this diagnosis.
 
Something just doesn't seem to be right here.

Does anyone else find this MAIS diagnosis based on T x LH kinda fishy considering roids background at a young age?

Something baffles me here-- you're not being objective, all issues you listed as low testosterone signs may have nothing to do with it.

1) You never new your levels before roids, it's just a speculation.

2) Testosterone 800 is not really high or abnormal.

3) Depression, concentration problems, lower libido than most males, confidence with women are not exactly the signs of sex hormones problems. There are many introverted / melancholic / asthenic / ectomorphs / boyish / ADD folks out there, but it doesn't mean treatment with testosterone will make them the opposite of what they are. These things simply have nothing to do with TRT and are not cured by it. All that can be referred to general constitutional health.

4) What real symptoms of low T did you have-- in that age that would be developmental issues. If before roids you had normal puberty (maybe later than some people, but still in normal timeframe), secondary sex characteristics development, no boobs, normal penis length, public hair development, in other words you were developing normally-- if this is true, that means you were normal! It would mean hormones worked. E.g. were you the least masculine in school, college etc? Did you have women's public hair pattern? Is it even possible to to have AIS if you never had real developmental issues?

5) The only thing to support MAIS theory is you high LH. Are you also infertile, have azoospermia?

6) What about AR gene testing, all point of AIS is malfunctioning receptor, are you going to confirm that?

So, why I'm skeptical, interested and saying all that, this is because:

1) I have similar story, EXCEPT my LH is normal (however my test is up to 1000ng/ml and free test is 30% higher than normal), so I don't qualify for MAIS by simple LH x T test, however all issues are there. It does mean that it's not AIS causing problems in similar situation and that in your case it MAY BE not AIS as well. There's definitely something else may be involved.

2) I too "always knew that something was wrong", however I now realize it really wasn't-- all real problems worth attention started after steroid use. It doesn't mean I didn't have weak hormonal system that could be easily disturbed, but not MAIS by any stretch.

3) You're too quick to use really subjective arguments and jump to conclusions which make me think you're not willing to be objective, just want to rush with this diagnosis.

Hi EasyRider,

I have genetically confirmed MAIS (my mutation is in exon 1, and others with the same mutation as me have been published that also have MAIS).

My puberty was normal. My dick and balls are normal. My body hair is of the male pattern. I don't have boobs. In other words, I developed normally.

My LH is, and has always been normal. My T is usually around 1200, although it varies; it has been as low as 800 on several occasions (morning measurements).

My ASI is not elevated (125 ish).

Furthermore, I am fertile. My sperm count isn't even lowish; its normal, as are motility and morphology.

So why did I get tested for MAIS?

I saw several endocrinologists for an unrelated health problem. I mentioned to them that I thought it was odd that I didn't have much facial hair. They told me it was normal variation, that not everyone can grow a full beard.

I checked the literature, and found the various disorders of sexual development. None of them really fit me, particularly since most men with MAIS can grow facial hair just fine. However, I was curious because it just didn't seem normal to me that I could have such a high level of T and still go beardless.

One of my doctors agreed to "screen" me by giving me a fertility test. Normal. I went back to the research, and learned about DHT.

I knew I didn't fit the profile for 5-a reductase, particularly since I had normal genitalia and was fertile. However, I knew that facial hair was related to DHT. So I asked my doctor to test me. He agreed. It was normal. However, it was interesting to find that the ratio of T to DHT was unusually high. However, SHBG, free T, etc. were all normal.

Much like yourself, I grew up skinny, and didn't have an easy time putting on muscle. Like many others in their teens, I had mild gynecomastia (puffy nipples). None of this is unusual though, nor is it unusual to grow up with body image issues.

And although I had been dismissed by many doctors, I wanted to know for sure. So I told my doctor: "I want the test. I'll pay cash out of my pocket if I need to." He gave me the run-around. Eventually I saw a genetic counselor, and told her that "Doctor X suspects MAIS." She gave me the test. It was positive.

So what does that tell us? Here's the take-away:
  • MAIS is probably underdiagnosed because it's presentation is subtle. There are probably lots and lots of people out there that have it, but will never know because the test is expensive, and the symptoms are easy to ignore as "normal variation."
  • Because the presentation is so subtle, pretty much the only time MAIS is ever diagnosed is during a diagnostic workup for male infertility.
  • If you're not infertile, chances are that even if you do have MAIS, you'll never even know it.

So it is possible that you too have MAIS, although statistically it's unlikely, since your ASI is not elevated. Is it impossible? Certainly not, as my own case illustrates.

Lastly, and most importantly, you have to ask yourself: If the presentation for this disease is so subtle that I may not even know I have it, is there any real value for being diagnosed? The answer here is usually no.

This is because, typically, MAIS goes untreated. If (like Sade) you have some symptoms, then the diagnosis is useful. Likely, his symptoms will subside with higher T levels. Some people need treatment because they are infertile, and they want to father children (T has been shown to make this possible in men with MAIS as well).

As far as Sade's case goes: there aren't very many things that can result in elevated LH and T that don't also result in hyperandrogenism. This is why he was diagnosed so quickly by an AIS expert. If you try, you can come up with alternate explanations, but they would be less likely, and thus should become suspicious only if MAIS could be ruled out (e.g. by a negative genetic test). Here are a few such alternate explanations:
  • Sade is in the beginning stages of primary testicular failure, and it has been progressing unusually slowly, and also has a tumor in his pituitary that is hypersecreting LH.
  • Some unknown chemical agent has permanently desensitized his androgen receptors. Note that Sade has not used finasteride, nor other 5AR inhibitors.
  • The polyglutamine tract in Sade's AR is unusually long, and he has an early onset of Kennedy's disease. He just hasn't had any other other symptoms present yet.
  • A tumor in Sade's pituitary is hypersecreting LH, but his body has started to become insensitive to this particular kind of LH (it has happened before, strange as it sounds).

MAIS is more likely than any of these. Even if he never gets the test, it is still possible in the future to eliminate MAIS as a possibility: T should cause his LH to come down; if it doesn't, then it's not MAIS.

Here's my advice to others that find themselves wondering, could this be me? Could this be the reason that I'm this way? if you've got some issues with your body that are making you unhappy, then do what everyone else does: eat better, work out, and make the best of it. Take some martial arts classes. Even if you do have MAIS, you should be able to get into better-than-average shape and can defend yourself. You don't have to be posing on stage in BB competitions in order to feel OK about your body. If, like myself, you also have a scientific curiosity and want to know for sure, then get the test. Just don't expect the test to be easy to get, and expect to pay for it yourself (about $2,000 in the US).

And if you still feel bad about your body and choose to take steroids to compensate, you're certainly not alone; research shows that men who abuse steroids are more likely than controls to feel insecure about their bodies and to have eating disorders. (Check PubMed / Google Scholar if you want to see for yourself.)
 
...

3) You're too quick to use really subjective arguments and jump to conclusions which make me think you're not willing to be objective, just want to rush with this diagnosis.

I've noticed this as well and it is something he should think about as it makes the job of the doctor's that much more difficult as well
 
Structure:

If I recall, your current treatment is Testim. Is that correct? What is the dose? And do you have follow up sex hormones?

If not, what is the treatment?
 
Last edited:
Structure:

If I recall, your current treatment is Testim. Is that correct? What is the dose? And do you have follow up sex hormones?

If not, what is the treatment?

Yes, for MAIS the treatment is T. The dose depends on the individual, and on what the intention of treatment is; for example, the dose is usually higher in the studies done on (temporarily) reversing male infertility due to MAIS. In someone like Sade, the goal of the treatment should be to normalize LH by supplementing with T.

And of course, regular blood work. I wouldn't advise anyone to go to a doctor that would prescribe T without regular follow up blood work...

I myself have tried many treatments, all with the intention of exploring various hypotheses using myself as a guinea pig. Do I need any of them? No. I don't have the issues that Sade has.

One hypothesis I had was that E2 keeps T levels sub-optimal in men with MAIS. Here's the idea: We know that T is elevated in men with MAIS. This is because the body's defective androgen receptors don't use T efficiently, and thus "see" T as being too low. LH increases, which in turn increases T. However, aromatase functions normally, and thus the aromatase "sees" high levels of T, and works to convert it to E2. E2 receptors are also normal in MAIS, so the body's E2 receptors "see" high levels of E2, and feedback to lower T production. The end result is that although men with MAIS have elevated levels of T, their T levels are lower than their androgen receptors would like it to be, because of this E2 feedback.

I experimented on myself by taking a low dose of an aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole). It worked as expected, lowering my E2, and raising my T. I used it for about 3 months (my E2 was 25) before the anastrozole gave me tenosynovitis in both wrists. Thus, I had to discontinue it...
 
Yes, I'm infertile. I know because my count is low. Dr Conway wants me to get my fertility tested. My Free Testosterone last September was *34.4 pg/ml on a range of 8.8 - 27.0. Last May it was *32.7 on the same range of 8.8 - 27.0. My bioavailable T ordered by Dr Crisler was *303 on a range of 72 - 235 whilst my LH was 11.4 at this point. My DHT which was taken a couple month back was *4.00 on a range of 0.9 - 2.9 and Free Androgen Index was *111.5 on a range of 40 - 100.

My androgens are always elevated and so is my LH which was as high as 25.3 last August while my FSH was only 4.8.

Dr Gerard Conway has been dealing with AIS issues all his career and he dianosed me with MAIS because he saw my bloodwork. My persistently high T levels, LH levels, Free T levels, Bioavailable T levels, DHT levels, high Free Androgen Index high E2 levels and persistently elevated ASI. He diagnosed me and I'm happy with that. I was prepared for the genetic test but Dr Conway said I wouldn't need it because my bloodwork confirms a diagnosis of MAIS. Those were his words and he knows his shit.
 
I'm going to the GP tomorrow and will ask if I can have it tested on Dr Conways recommendation. I'm not paying for it though.
 
Something just doesn't seem to be right here.

Does anyone else find this MAIS diagnosis based on T x LH kinda fishy considering roids background at a young age?

Something baffles me here-- you're not being objective, all issues you listed as low testosterone signs may have nothing to do with it.

1) You never new your levels before roids, it's just a speculation.

2) Testosterone 800 is not really high or abnormal.

3) Depression, concentration problems, lower libido than most males, confidence with women are not exactly the signs of sex hormones problems. There are many introverted / melancholic / asthenic / ectomorphs / boyish / ADD folks out there, but it doesn't mean treatment with testosterone will make them the opposite of what they are. These things simply have nothing to do with TRT and are not cured by it. All that can be referred to general constitutional health.

4) What real symptoms of low T did you have-- in that age that would be developmental issues. If before roids you had normal puberty (maybe later than some people, but still in normal timeframe), secondary sex characteristics development, no boobs, normal penis length, public hair development, in other words you were developing normally-- if this is true, that means you were normal! It would mean hormones worked. E.g. were you the least masculine in school, college etc? Did you have women's public hair pattern? Is it even possible to to have AIS if you never had real developmental issues?

5) The only thing to support MAIS theory is you high LH. Are you also infertile, have azoospermia?

6) What about AR gene testing, all point of AIS is malfunctioning receptor, are you going to confirm that?

So, why I'm skeptical, interested and saying all that, this is because:

1) I have similar story, EXCEPT my LH is normal (however my test is up to 1000ng/ml and free test is 30% higher than normal), so I don't qualify for MAIS by simple LH x T test, however all issues are there. It does mean that it's not AIS causing problems in similar situation and that in your case it MAY BE not AIS as well. There's definitely something else may be involved.

2) I too "always knew that something was wrong", however I now realize it really wasn't-- all real problems worth attention started after steroid use. It doesn't mean I didn't have weak hormonal system that could be easily disturbed, but not MAIS by any stretch.

3) You're too quick to use really subjective arguments and jump to conclusions which make me think you're not willing to be objective, just want to rush with this diagnosis.

Even if I took the Genetic Test and it came back negative; the fact that my LH is so high means that my brain thinks the T I'm producing is low and is unsatisfied and screaming for more. Taking T will lower this demand and if the genetic test does come back normal, then it'll mean that AAS downregulated my androgen receptors and now I need higher than normal T levels to feel well.

Also, gaining only a few pounds from a 9 moth cycle of test E is kind of weird isn't it? If my androgen receptors were functioning fine then don't you think I'd be pretty huge by now? And the fact that I sometimes lost erections upon penetration in my early 20's isn't normal either. I also have mild gynecomastia.

I told the doc all about my past steroid use and he still diagnosed me with MAIS.
 
Androgen receptors arent downregulated by AAS.

Exactly, but EasyRider seems to think that Dr Gerard Conway is a douchebag and is wrong in diagnosing me with MAIS and if what he thinks is true then it must mean that I've downregulated my androgen receptors because my LH is constantly high which means that my brain thinks my T is low and because he thinks that this only happened after steroids, then the only thing that can explain my elevated T and LH is downregulation after steroid abuse because he seems to think I don't have MAIS.
 
Exactly, but EasyRider seems to think that Dr Gerard Conway is a douchebag and is wrong in diagnosing me with MAIS and if what he thinks is true then it must mean that I've downregulated my androgen receptors because my LH is constantly high which means that my brain thinks my T is low and because he thinks that this only happened after steroids, then the only thing that can explain my elevated T and LH is downregulation after steroid abuse because he seems to think I don't have MAIS.

Or you have had MAIS all along and possibly the AAS actually did have an effect on your AR.
I dont know if the effect of AAS on MAIS as related to AR DR has been studied.
But here is how to find out:
PubMed home
 
Or you have had MAIS all along and possibly the AAS actually did have an effect on your AR.
I dont know if the effect of AAS on MAIS as related to AR DR has been studied.
But here is how to find out:
PubMed home

Of course, anything is possible. However, in my opinion, the simplest explanation (and statistically most likely) is usually a better route for investigation (Occam's razor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

But to entertain the hypothesis: among the documented cases of men with MAIS that have been treated with higher doses of steroids to temporarily reverse infertility, some have been treated on more than one occasion, and there was no mention of downregulation, nor was there any significant variation in the results from the steroids (mind you, "higher" in this context means more than the usual amount used for medical purposes, which still doesn't come anywhere near the megadoses used by BB'ers, e.g. 250 mg / week).

For your reading pleasure: Pregnancy after hormonal correction of severe sper... [Lancet. 1994] - PubMed result

Lack of studies notwithstanding (i.e. just shooting from the hip), I don't see any connection / evidence between MAIS and AR downregulation.

If there's a reason to doubt this doctor's diagnosis, it is not apparent to me. If it were to be disproved in the future, then I'd guess Sade has a very unusual presentation of primary hypogonadism. In either case, the treatment would be the same: T.
 
Of course, anything is possible. However, in my opinion, the simplest explanation (and statistically most likely) is usually a better route for investigation (Occam's razor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

But to entertain the hypothesis: among the documented cases of men with MAIS that have been treated with higher doses of steroids to temporarily reverse infertility, some have been treated on more than one occasion, and there was no mention of downregulation, nor was there any significant variation in the results from the steroids (mind you, "higher" in this context means more than the usual amount used for medical purposes, which still doesn't come anywhere near the megadoses used by BB'ers, e.g. 250 mg / week).

For your reading pleasure: Pregnancy after hormonal correction of severe sper... [Lancet. 1994] - PubMed result

Lack of studies notwithstanding (i.e. just shooting from the hip), I don't see any connection / evidence between MAIS and AR downregulation.

If there's a reason to doubt this doctor's diagnosis, it is not apparent to me. If it were to be disproved in the future, then I'd guess Sade has a very unusual presentation of primary hypogonadism. In either case, the treatment would be the same: T.

Or in the vernacular of the streets: KISS (keep it simple stupid)
Do you think that the severity of ARI Sx might have a normal distribution or is it more like you have it and thats it or you don`t.? The reason I bring it up is that different individuals seem to have differing responses to the DA levels brought on by male orgasm. DA and libido are inversely related as is DA and T. Since the refractory period varies from hours to days even within the same age group I`m wordering if differing AR efficiency is somehow involved. This appears to be the case with other receptors, i.e. LDL receptors. Just a thought.
 
Or in the vernacular of the streets: KISS (keep it simple stupid)
Do you think that the severity of ARI Sx might have a normal distribution or is it more like you have it and thats it or you don`t.? The reason I bring it up is that different individuals seem to have differing responses to the DA levels brought on by male orgasm. DA and libido are inversely related as is DA and T. Since the refractory period varies from hours to days even within the same age group I`m wordering if differing AR efficiency is somehow involved. This appears to be the case with other receptors, i.e. LDL receptors. Just a thought.

Yes, you are correct that there is a range of AR efficiency in the non-MAIS population. For example, the AR has two polymorphic sections: the polyglutamine tract, and the polyglycene tract. As the name implies, each microsatellite is a trinucleotide repeat (e.g. CAG-CAG-CAG...). There have been many studies on the effect of the lengths of these sections; it is evident that the efficiency of the AR is affected. For example, among caucasians, the average polyglutamine length is 21 repetitions. If your AR is significantly longer, then you will have less sensitivity to androgens. This is but one example; there are many other factors involved affecting the body's ability to use androgens. Some of these factors are used to explain how some people with ambiguous genitalia (i.e. PAIS) have no AR mutations.

This helps explain why the ASI has a range of normal; different people have different sensitivities to androgens, despite being perfectly normal. Of course, there are exceptions (some people will have a normal ASI, and yet will still have MAIS, and vice versa).

As previously mentioned, Sade's ASI is quite out of range. He's operating around 300-400, while normal is < 140 ish. In the study that looked at ASI that I've read (Hiort et al), men were first screened by ASI, and anyone with an elevated ASI was tested for AR mutations. Only two men had ASI's that were over 140. Both had MAIS.
 
Thaanks, I thought so but didnt know the biology of the thing, There is more I would like to get into re AI, but have to save it for later.
Sorry about hijacking your thread Sade. I`ll move the above to a separate thread if you want. Hopefully your problem is clearer now. :)
 
Thaanks, I thought so but didnt know the biology of the thing, There is more I would like to get into re AI, but have to save it for later.
Sorry about hijacking your thread Sade. I`ll move the above to a separate thread if you want. Hopefully your problem is clearer now. :)

It's ok man. Some people on here and Crislers forum still think I don't have MAIS.

If I don't have mAIS then why the fuck is my T so high after a 9 month Test E cycle? Why is my LH so god damn high? Why are my free T and bioavailable T levels over the range? Why is my DHT and Free Androgen Index over the range? Tell me that PLEASE. Because I just wanna know why they are so high and yet my LH is so high? And why the hell did Dr Conway diagnose me if I don't have mAIS?

You guys tell me now why my motherfucking T levels, Free T levels, Bioavailable T levels, DHT levels, Free Androgen Index levels and LH levels are elevated? You tell me now?
 
It's ok man. Some people on here and Crislers forum still think I don't have MAIS.

If I don't have mAIS then why the fuck is my T so high after a 9 month Test E cycle? Why is my LH so god damn high? Why are my free T and bioavailable T levels over the range? Why is my DHT and Free Androgen Index over the range? Tell me that PLEASE. Because I just wanna know why they are so high and yet my LH is so high? And why the hell did Dr Conway diagnose me if I don't have mAIS?

You guys tell me now why my motherfucking T levels, Free T levels, Bioavailable T levels, DHT levels, Free Androgen Index levels and LH levels are elevated? You tell me now?

I have no idea if you have MAIS or not. My only point is that if you do it wasnt caused by taking testesterone.
 
I have no idea if you have MAIS or not. My only point is that if you do it wasnt caused by taking testesterone.

Exactly my point zkt. I know it wasn't caused by taking test but some people still don't believe that I have it. If it's not MAIS then the test must have downregulated my androgen receptors by raising my Free T, Bioavailable, T, DHT, Free Androgen Index and LH levels. If it's not MAIS then Test E must have downregulated my receptors because my high LH means that my brain thinks my T is low and if it's not MAIS then Test E must have done this to my androgen receptors.

And also the fact that I only gained a few pounds from a 9 month cycle while eating 3000+ calories a day has nothing to do with MAIS either. I was born to be and stay skinny all my life. It has nothing what so ever to do with androgen insensitivity.
 
I think the only way you will discover what the actual diagnosis is will be response to treatment. The diagnosis has little meaning until you achieve symptom remission.
 
Back
Top