Sciroxx Labs Testodex Enanthate 250 - GC-MS/MS - 2016-01 - performed by ChemTox via AnabolicLab.com

[AnabolicLab.com]

Sciroxx Labs Testodex Enanthate 250 was determined to have actual content of 207 milligrams per milliliter testosterone enanthate and 65.3 mg/ml testosterone phenylpropionate. No other anabolic steroids were detected.

Correction: February 11, 2016
The original lab report dated January 29, 2016 was retracted by ChemTox. The original report stated that no other steroids were detected. The February 11, 2016 analysis of a second preparation of the same sample by ChemTox revealed the additional presence of 65.3 mg/ml testosterone phenylpropionate.

Steroid analytics courtesy of AnabolicLab.com: Sciroxx Laboratories Testodex Enanthate 250 Lab Test Results - Anabolic Lab

View media item 830
View media item 829
View media item 790

 

[myosaurus]

this was a surprise...

 

[Capt Forest]

this was a surprise...

Not to me. I always felt this brand was trash.

I would have thought it be lower actually

 

[GigaloRob]

Not to me. I always felt this brand was trash.

I would have thought it be lower actually

Thought that as well.

 

[Power_house90]

Lmao this doesn't surprise me!

 

[Sampei]

So good for gmp facility producing HGH xD they can't get a test E vial dosage right...

 

[G.I. Bro]

Let me first say, huge fan of anaboliclab.com and all it stands for. Also a fan of Millard. Main reason I still come to this board.

But I did notice something about this that may not be accurate. Karl often has test phenyl blended in the test enanthate. This is actually a choice. I do not know the exact ratios, so maybe it doesn't matter. But it appears the lab only tested for enanthate, and if so, isn't it possible not accounting for the test phenyl would yield this underdosed result? The full results indicate they did not test for anything but enanthate ester.

Millard, you may want to personally review this instance, the full labs, and the sample from the lab and see for sure. The sample will reveal a phenyl content I believe. I trust your word and know you'd make sure the type of test done didn't accidentally and unfairly sling mud on a brand. That is not what anaboliclab.com or your great service to the community is about. Sciroxx's mistake is he should list the phenyl content and ratio to avoid this, or not use it at all. But he did not do this. Still not sure his brand deserves to be tarnished if this is in fact the case.

I use pharmacom and sciroxx exclusively. I am not associated with either. But I know this result would be unfair of its shown he did have a phenyl/enanthate blend.

 

[Trapmonster]

Sciroxx Labs Testodex Enanthate 250 was determined to have actual content of 207 milligrams per milliliter testosterone enanthate. No other anabolic steroids were detected.

Steroid analytics courtesy of AnabolicLab.com: Sciroxx Laboratories Testodex Enanthate 250 Lab Test Results - Anabolic Lab

View media item 789
View media item 790

Let me first say, huge fan of anaboliclab.com and all it stands for. Also a fan of Millard. Main reason I still come to this board.

But I did notice something about this that may not be accurate. Karl often has test phenyl blended in the test enanthate. This is actually a choice. I do not know the exact ratios, so maybe it doesn't matter. But it appears the lab only tested for enanthate, and if so, isn't it possible not accounting for the test phenyl would yield this underdosed result? The full results indicate they did not test for anything but enanthate ester.

Millard, you may want to personally review this instance, the full labs, and the sample from the lab and see for sure. The sample will reveal a phenyl content I believe. I trust your word and know you'd make sure the type of test done didn't accidentally and unfairly sling mud on a brand. That is not what anaboliclab.com or your great service to the community is about. Sciroxx's mistake is he should list the phenyl content and ratio to avoid this, or not use it at all. But he did not do this. Still not sure his brand deserves to be tarnished if this is in fact the case.

I use pharmacom and sciroxx exclusively. I am not associated with either. But I know this result would be unfair of its shown he did have a phenyl/enanthate blend.

If it did have phenyl it would have been detected, take a look at the report. It detects other steroids if contaminated and according the the result none other were detected

 

[G.I. Bro]

If it did have phenyl it would have been detected, take a look at the report. It detects other steroids if contaminated and according the the result none other were detected

And so begins the parade of retards posting shit without knowing what they're talking about. Just have to crucify somebody. When I think of meso I think of pitchforks.

You're only partially understanding what happened here. You're right as to compounds but you're missing a big piece of the puzzle and I'm not spoon feeding you. Go back to the end of the line.

 

[Trapmonster]

And so begins the parade of retards posting shit without knowing what they're talking about. Just have to crucify somebody. When I think of meso I think of pitchforks.

You're only partially understanding what happened here. You're right as to compounds but you're missing a big piece of the puzzle and I'm not spoon feeding you. Go back to the end of the line.

I get what you're saying, but unless if you're trying to discredit AL.com what you're saying makes no sense.whether or not the phenyl blend was purposely mixed or not, if it was present, to make up for the missing 50mg, it would have been detected and shown up in the report as x-mg of phenyl or whatever else may have been in it. Now let me ask you, does that answer your question and show that I did understand your statement to begin with?

 

[Trapmonster]

With that said, if he had advertised it with phenyl like you claim he actually does, then it would have been a completely bs claim since Chem tox did not detect ANY OTHER COMPOUND in the sample

 

[G.I. Bro]

I get what you're saying, but unless if you're trying to discredit AL.com what you're saying makes no sense.whether or not the phenyl blend was purposely mixed or not, if it was present, to make up for the missing 50mg, it would have been detected and shown up in the report as x-mg of phenyl or whatever else may have been in it. Now let me ask you, does that answer your question and show that I did understand your statement to begin with?

Not discrediting them. AL is a website. My post history shows I'm about as big a Millard fanboy as it gets. An identified lab performs the testing. They'll confirm they tested for test E and not test phenyl. I'm driving I'm not fucking with this anymore. Just going to sit back and see how Millard handles it. If the sample has no phenyl then it's correct. That's what needs to be answered then addressed publicly.

 

[G.I. Bro]

With that said, if he had advertised it with phenyl like you claim he actually does, then it would have been a completely bs claim since Chem tox did not detect ANY OTHER COMPOUND in the sample

Without being rude again, you're not understanding.

 

[Trapmonster]

Not sure if you knew but Chem tox tests for all substances unlike simec that only tests for one. This was mentioned by Millard before.

 

[AnTabolic73]

Gi Joe isn't understanding. The chemtox report clearly states no ther anabolics found, and even lists phenylprop as one of the other steroids tested for.

 

[G.I. Bro]

I'm well aware it's supposed to screen for other predetermined compounds. I'm just going to wait and let Karl and Millard clear it up. You guys aren't working with all the info and I'm not sure I even am either.

But I do know I've seen emails from employees at the lab confirming only test E would be tested even if test phenyl appeared on the chromatogram. Also that no other test was requested. Also the full report itself. Have you been made privy to this gentlemen?

 

[mkulltra58]

I'm well aware it's supposed to screen for other predetermined compounds. I'm just going to wait and let Karl and Millard clear it up. You guys aren't working with all the info and I'm not sure I even am either.

Fucking shill

 

[G.I. Bro]

Fucking shill

Of course, I'm paid by sciroxx in gear to come in here and point out the possibility of a flawed analysis. It's all a grand conspiracy to continue selling bunk gear. Well done meso.

What if I'm just an abnormally aggressive, well educated consumer? What if I had been a customer of sciroxx and wanted answers. What if due to him trusting me, when I got in his ass, he provided pretty damn convicing evidence of said answer. What if said answer is that the sample had a blend of phenyl/enanthate and the full report and communication with lab indicates no such test for phenyl was performed?

 

[Docd187123]

I'm well aware it's supposed to screen for other predetermined compounds. I'm just going to wait and let Karl and Millard clear it up. You guys aren't working with all the info and I'm not sure I even am either.

But I do know I've seen emails from employees at the lab confirming only test E would be tested even if test phenyl appeared on the chromatogram. Also that no other test was requested. Also the full report itself. Have you been made privy to this gentlemen?

Is English your first language? If not then I can understand your confusion but if it is:

It clearly states in simple English that the sample was tested for test phenylpropionate. How much more clear you need it stated I have no clue but your response to Trapmonster was a worse than I'd expect from a 2nd grader whose toys were taken away. If your IQ has even 2 significant digits I'd be fucking surprised bc your lack of reading comprehension borders autism.

 

[G.I. Bro]

Is English your first language? If not then I can understand your confusion but if it is:

It clearly states in simple English that the sample was tested for test phenylpropionate. How much more clear you need it stated I have no clue but your response to Trapmonster was a worse than I'd expect from a 2nd grader whose toys were taken away. If your IQ has even 2 significant digits I'd be fucking surprised bc your lack of reading comprehension borders autism.

Again, until Millard and Karl decide how they are handling this, it pointless for me to sit here and just get flamed. From what I have seen, there is some doubt that the sample was tested for phenyl. I'm aware of the bottom portion of pdf 1 from the website listing compounds. But the internal email I saw reads differently and frankly, only Millard can talk with the lab and get to the bottom of it and I have faith he will. When he responds here I'm accepting what he states.