What is the shelf life here in general and specific ATP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is the shelf life here in general and specific ATP.
I always injected gh IM, weird to say maybe but I got used to with my daily Sustanon injections, so I thought I already know how to pin a muscle as I rotate between 12 sites and the gh needles are micro.Your numbers aligned closely with the results of a paper I read recently, which is why I suspected you injected IM.
In a study of trained, lean athletes, IM produced GH peaks more than 2.5x higher than SubQ at the same dose. This was with doses similar to PED use, not the low medical GH replacement doses.
Numbers are given as Mean (Minimum / Maximum).
View attachment 334800
Area under the curve (total exposure to GH) IM was from 1.5x to 2x higher than SubQ. From what I understand, this significantly boosts GH's fat loss and cognitive effects.
IGF was roughly the same for IM and SubQ. Area under the curve (total exposure to IGF) was slightly less with IM (~10%), reducing the IGF anabolic effect a little.
View attachment 334801
Overall, it looks like you might get a lot "more" out of a dose using IM administration than SubQ. All the GH receptor benefits (fat burning. cognition) of a dose more than twice as high, while only sacrificing 10% of the IGF (anabolic) benefits.
View attachment 334802
Thanks for sharing that. If you want the full study lmk and I'll DM you a copy. Out of curiosity, any particular reason you started injecting IM?
Narrator: He's not 4%That's gotta be stage ready? Just a noob here but didn't think that was sustainable for long at all?
4% ? You do know how lean that is right, send the forum tit pics or you're lyingIM thigh, occasionally I’ll go subq, 195, 4%BF.
yeah clearly not accurate at all lol 99% of everything that claims to tell bodyfat is complete fraudMine was measured by an InBody to be at 3%. I was closer to 9% at the time. I still bragged to nearly everyone I knew
Last weeks DXA work? And yes, I rounded down .5. Oh well. Shoot me.4% ? You do know how lean that is right, send the forum tit pics or you're lying
Last weeks DXA work? And yes, I rounded down .5. Oh well. Shoot me.
And 110% pure dumb luck with genetics.I'm going to attribute this remarkable achievement (at 48!) to the most obvious factors.
10% diet and workout protocol
20% IM rHGH
80% Filtering
![]()
See, I knew it. 4% was a total lieLast weeks DXA work? And yes, I rounded down .5. Oh well. Shoot me.
Gimme two weeks.See, I knew it. 4% was a total lie
It’s not. And I’m not going to squeeze any more. I am about to go into bulk mode next week. I’d fucking lose hard.If this is a bet, calling on the great @readalot
Very impressive especially at “our” age to be that low. I start feeling shitty anywhere below 8%It’s not. And I’m not going to squeeze any more. I am about to go into bulk mode next week. I’d fucking lose hard.
I aint asking for a pic but you must be miserable. Mad respect dude even the measurement is under a few percent.It’s not. And I’m not going to squeeze any more. I am about to go into bulk mode next week. I’d fucking lose hard.
Im asking for a pic. I wanna see.I aint asking for a pic but you must be miserable. Mad respect dude even the measurement is under a few percent.
That's very interesting, thank you sharing that. Would love the full study to peruse.Your numbers aligned closely with the results of a paper I read recently, which is why I suspected you injected IM.
In a study of trained, lean athletes, IM produced GH peaks more than 2.5x higher than SubQ at the same dose. This was with doses similar to PED use, not the low medical GH replacement doses.
Numbers are given as Mean (Minimum / Maximum).
View attachment 334800
Area under the curve (total exposure to GH) IM was from 1.5x to 2x higher than SubQ. From what I understand, this significantly boosts GH's fat loss and cognitive effects.
IGF was roughly the same for IM and SubQ. Area under the curve (total exposure to IGF) was slightly less with IM (~10%), reducing the IGF anabolic effect a little.
View attachment 334801
Overall, it looks like you might get a lot "more" out of a dose using IM administration than SubQ. All the GH receptor benefits (fat burning. cognition) of a dose more than twice as high, while only sacrificing 10% of the IGF (anabolic) benefits.
View attachment 334802
Thanks for sharing that. If you want the full study lmk and I'll DM you a copy. Out of curiosity, any particular reason you started injecting IM?
I would greatly appreciate a copy of the study, brother. Thanks for sharing this info.Your numbers aligned closely with the results of a paper I read recently, which is why I suspected you injected IM.
In a study of trained, lean athletes, IM produced GH peaks more than 2.5x higher than SubQ at the same dose. This was with doses similar to PED use, not the low medical GH replacement doses.
Numbers are given as Mean (Minimum / Maximum).
View attachment 334800
Area under the curve (total exposure to GH) IM was from 1.5x to 2x higher than SubQ. From what I understand, this significantly boosts GH's fat loss and cognitive effects.
IGF was roughly the same for IM and SubQ. Area under the curve (total exposure to IGF) was slightly less with IM (~10%), reducing the IGF anabolic effect a little.
View attachment 334801
Overall, it looks like you might get a lot "more" out of a dose using IM administration than SubQ. All the GH receptor benefits (fat burning. cognition) of a dose more than twice as high, while only sacrificing 10% of the IGF (anabolic) benefits.
View attachment 334802
Thanks for sharing that. If you want the full study lmk and I'll DM you a copy. Out of curiosity, any particular reason you started injecting IM?
