[SOURCE] Canadian Domestic Anabolics Introduction

[CDNDA]

Again I'm not taking a stab at you, just commenting as the image you portray is unusual for this type of business.

I know you're still waiting for the tangle labels to come in, but do you have a picture or design of what they will look like? Surely you have an image of what they will look like.

Okay, how soon can you get Pharma Grade Proviron tablets in? Preferably by Bayer.

No, no and I'm not taking it that way I need to set myself apart. If Coke and Pepsi were the same it wouldn't matter much which you purchased. I'm modeling my approach after GAIN. The laundry detergent. It started out as the bargain brand. Offering a great product for a cheap price now it's among the industry leaders at top billing.

Yes, of course I know what they look like. I designed them. I draw, paint and sculpt clay in my spare time. An artist of sorts if you will. I wont release them until I have all of them and I can do a full lineup shot. I know it is frustrating. I want to have them more badly than you want to see them.

Please email me. I wont conduct business in the open...too many prying eyes. Plus it's no ones business except yours and my own.

CDNDA@Protonmail.com
CDNDA@Tutanota.com

 

[Fitwelder]

What esters are in the t500?

 

[3ml]

Why don't you use XVG completely stealth transaction

 

[CDNDA]

What esters are in the t500?

Testing a few options. Will release more info as it gets closer to release.

Why don't you use XVG completely stealth transaction

Because Verge is flakey as hell...lol.

On a more serious note,

Ill accept many forms of cryptocurrency. Eth, btc , ltc, ripple, etc etc. Clients may let me know how theyd like to pay and if I can do it. I will. Im open to working with my clients to find a solution that works for all parties involved.

 

[WCL]

Testing a few options. Will release more info as it gets closer to release.




Because Verge is flakey as hell...lol.

On a more serious note,

Ill accept many forms of cryptocurrency. Eth, btc , ltc, ripple, etc etc. Clients may let me know how theyd like to pay and if I can do it. I will. Im open to working with my clients to find a solution that works for all parties involved.

300 Test E
175 Test D / 25 Test P (or all Test D instead)

with 10-15% EO

Will likely yield the best result in terms of PIP and smoothness

 

[Steve84]

300 Test E
175 Test D / 25 Test P (or all Test D instead)

with 10-15% EO

Will likely yield the best result in terms of PIP and smoothness

Why not just all test e with EO?
25 prop is kinda dumb in my opinion. Serves little purpose as you only inject every 3/4 days. And 25 is nothing in terms of the overall concentration.
Do long esters or short esters don't see much point in doing both together as you usually pin to a long ester schedule. Keep the levels flat.

My opinion

 

[WCL]

Why not just all test e with EO?
25 prop is kinda dumb in my opinion. Serves little purpose as you only inject every 3/4 days. And 25 is nothing in terms of the overall concentration.
Do long esters or short esters don't see much point in doing both together as you usually pin to a long ester schedule. Keep the levels flat.

My opinion

EO:
The main reason is that unless you are using a specific filter (which isn't used on many of the methods use to filter large batches), the EO will melt the filter. I haven't seen the type needed in high volume filtration devices, only syringe filters. I can't speak much on the topic, but any lab that offers 100% EO blends, ask them how they are filtering, and what is the filter made of. If they don't have the right answer, they may be accidentally producing unfiltered product. the correct filter needed is PTFE. PVDF filters have been widely used, but at 100% EO you may run into issues as well. Both are used for high solvent combos.

The second reason is that the amount of EO that generally provides positive dispersion properties, but without the possible negative PIP, is an amount between 10-25% total volume.

You are right. 100% EO will hold 500 mg Test E with no issue, and if filtered properly and the client handles the EO- it is a winner.

As for the splitting of the esters, I have found decanoate and enanthate to be able to blend together without PIP. The short ester thrown in helps to increase the amount of testosterone that the long ester of decanoate displaced. Perhaps that is redundant and not needed, but this is a my personal preference. I have also found it to be received well with a short ester added in a small amount.

 

[CDNDA]

300 Test E
175 Test D / 25 Test P (or all Test D instead)

with 10-15% EO

Will likely yield the best result in terms of PIP and smoothness

I brewed one very similar to this.

I also made a 500 test E, a 300mg Test e/ 200mg Test C and bunch of variations with test P, Test D etc etc etc...

I brewed about 10 different ones. I wont release it until it's right. I don't believe in just pushing out products for the sake of it.

Why not just all test e with EO?
25 prop is kinda dumb in my opinion. Serves little purpose as you only inject every 3/4 days. And 25 is nothing in terms of the overall concentration.
Do long esters or short esters don't see much point in doing both together as you usually pin to a long ester schedule. Keep the levels flat.

My opinion

I don't like 100% EO. I hate it in fact. I don't like using more chemicals than absolutely needed. I doubt I'll ever do 100% EO unless I'm contracted to make it for a client. My aim is to make my compounds as gentle as I possibly can. It works yes, works very well. But at what cost? Everything has a cost. I want my clients to be as healthy as possible. I'm biased against EO yes..it's true...I don't react badly to it I just believe in less chemicals.

Many people inject EOD with longer acting compounds. Myself included. That's why I dosed my compounds like I did when I started out. However not everyone does this and I am adjusting to thst to appeal to broader range of clients.

 

[CDNDA]

Electrum? Or are you meaning ethereum , isn’t electrum a wallet? Or is it a coin?

Right you are...lol. Yes...Ethereum is the coin. Electrum is a wallet. Ill be alright..

 

[Steve84]

EO:
The main reason is that unless you are using a specific filter (which isn't used on many of the methods use to filter large batches), the EO will melt the filter. I haven't seen the type needed in high volume filtration devices, only syringe filters. I can't speak much on the topic, but any lab that offers 100% EO blends, ask them how they are filtering, and what is the filter made of. If they don't have the right answer, they may be accidentally producing unfiltered product. the correct filter needed is PTFE. PVDF filters have been widely used, but at 100% EO you may run into issues as well. Both are used for high solvent combos.

The second reason is that the amount of EO that generally provides positive dispersion properties, but without the possible negative PIP, is an amount between 10-25% total volume.

You are right. 100% EO will hold 500 mg Test E with no issue, and if filtered properly and the client handles the EO- it is a winner.

As for the splitting of the esters, I have found decanoate and enanthate to be able to blend together without PIP. The short ester thrown in helps to increase the amount of testosterone that the long ester of decanoate displaced. Perhaps that is redundant and not needed, but this is a my personal preference. I have also found it to be received well with a short ester added in a small amount.

I think I said that wrong... what I implied was why not 500 test E using ba/bb and only EO as required to get it to hold.
I don't think Pharmacom is 100% EO on their blend of e-500 I think they use the combination of the 3.
From what I understand you shouldn't use more EO than what is required.

Again still learning this crash course on brewing lol

 

[Nissan]

EO:
The main reason is that unless you are using a specific filter (which isn't used on many of the methods use to filter large batches), the EO will melt the filter. I haven't seen the type needed in high volume filtration devices, only syringe filters. I can't speak much on the topic, but any lab that offers 100% EO blends, ask them how they are filtering, and what is the filter made of. If they don't have the right answer, they may be accidentally producing unfiltered product. the correct filter needed is PTFE. PVDF filters have been widely used, but at 100% EO you may run into issues as well. Both are used for high solvent combos.

The second reason is that the amount of EO that generally provides positive dispersion properties, but without the possible negative PIP, is an amount between 10-25% total volume.

You are right. 100% EO will hold 500 mg Test E with no issue, and if filtered properly and the client handles the EO- it is a winner.

As for the splitting of the esters, I have found decanoate and enanthate to be able to blend together without PIP. The short ester thrown in helps to increase the amount of testosterone that the long ester of decanoate displaced. Perhaps that is redundant and not needed, but this is a my personal preference. I have also found it to be received well with a short ester added in a small amount.

The first thing that came to mind... Lol!

 

[Fattest_animal]

View attachment 83780

The first thing that came to mind... Lol!

Just imagine Heisenberg swole as fuck.

 

[CDNDA]

Had many positive emails but clients are reluctant to post bloods or feedback. I will not divulge client emails or even who my clients are. They seemingly wish to remain anonymous as is their right.

In saying that i will be requesting my own bloodwork. Getting it done and posting it here. Not just the numbers but the actual results from the lab. I know that a source posting their own bloodwork is viewed with a measured skepticism but at this point it's time for some hard evidence. So once i get those done ill be posting them up.

Anyone posting bloodwork will receive a credit on their next order. Those leaving feedback will also receive a credit (albeit a smaller credit) on their next order.

My new list is now complete and will be dropping very soon. Ive listened to the membership, my own clients as well as my own instincts to provide you all with many more new and exciting options.

Exciting things are afoot from my little upstart lab! Stay tuned!

 

[Vita]

Look, do yourself a favor and don't post your own bloods. doing so will only cause issues as you stated. No one here is coming down on you all that hard so sit back and see what happens. If you really want a review offer store credit for the amount of a lab test and the price of a vial of oil, I'm sure someone will jump on that. Not talking about a simple little Labmax home test, but an actual breakdown of what's in the vial.

You should however set a few conditions on this like:

Whoever is thinking of doing this can't let you know what their intent is until after they receive their product.

Total allowable cost for testing you will reimburse.

Minimum number of posts or time as a member hear (no tests done by a member with one post will be taken serious).

If the test comes back bad refund instead of credit.

 

[CDNDA]

Look, do yourself a favor and don't post your own bloods. doing so will only cause issues as you stated. No one here is coming down on you all that hard so sit back and see what happens. If you really want a review offer store credit for the amount of a lab test and the price of a vial of oil, I'm sure someone will jump on that. Not talking about a simple little Labmax home test, but an actual breakdown of what's in the vial.

You should however set a few conditions on this like:

Whoever is thinking of doing this can't let you know what their intent is until after they receive their product.

Total allowable cost for testing you will reimburse.

Minimum number of posts or time as a member hear (no tests done by a member with one post will be taken serious).

If the test comes back bad refund instead of credit.

I hear you. Ive offered credits for testing of any kind in my first OP i believe and I've offered it a couple weeks ago. So far no takers. Ofc if any products come back over 10% less than label claim i would fully refund anyone or offer replacement product from a new batch.

Im wanting to be proactive. I'd send them to Analyzer myself but again. It'd be viewed with the same measured skepticism.

I am entirely open to your suggestions. I appreciate your post. Im doing my best to show that I am constantly working hard on providing the best I can.

 

[Steve84]

I hear you. Ive offered credits for testing of any kind in my first OP i believe and I've offered it a couple weeks ago. So far no takers. Ofc if any products come back over 10% less than label claim i would fully refund anyone or offer replacement product from a new batch.

Im wanting to be proactive. I'd send them to Analyzer myself but again. It'd be viewed with the same measured skepticism.

I am entirely open to your suggestions. I appreciate your post. Im doing my best to show that I am constantly working hard on providing the best I can.

I actually in some Regards disagree with the statement that if you send your own stuff to Analyzer it isn't viewed seriously.

With being a new lab... it's easy to say you can dose your products correctly. I think it's more of what is the outcome by sending to Analyzer yourself on your own products.

Well that answer is that it can spark interest that you brewed properly dosed gear.
Does it speak to as much credibility as a client testing anonymously... no
But for members on the fence... you might spark interest.

The way I see it, random bought testing vs your own testing... it just shows validation to your claim I brewed and it came out such and such.
Just by testing yourself don't take away your credit for someone randomly testing/bloods.

 

[UpNorth]

I test every batch I make. The batch tested low. Instead of sending out sub par product I chose to inconvenience the client and ensure quality control.

No one has ever reported my gear being dirty or under dosed as of this writing.

I'll be staying on this forum. Every source has had issues. I will never send out a low quality product. If that means I piss off some special snowflakes in the process...so be it. I will not lower my standards in the name of profit. As stated in my intro.

I'm not now or have ever been CN.

Take care.

I hear you. Ive offered credits for testing of any kind in my first OP i believe and I've offered it a couple weeks ago. So far no takers. Ofc if any products come back over 10% less than label claim i would fully refund anyone or offer replacement product from a new batch.

Im wanting to be proactive. I'd send them to Analyzer myself but again. It'd be viewed with the same measured skepticism.

I am entirely open to your suggestions. I appreciate your post. Im doing my best to show that I am constantly working hard on providing the best I can.

I thought you had a hplc testing source... you already said you did and you "wouldn't name them, but you have your ways" But now you are posting your own bloods as a way to legitimize your product? I have a hard time trusting a thing you say

You realize everything you write on this forum stays up for people to read..?

 

[DIE KRAFT]

CDNDA, please respond to my email.

 

[Vita]

I actually in some Regards disagree with the statement that if you send your own stuff to Analyzer it isn't viewed seriously.

With being a new lab... it's easy to say you can dose your products correctly. I think it's more of what is the outcome by sending to Analyzer yourself on your own products.

Well that answer is that it can spark interest that you brewed properly dosed gear.
Does it speak to as much credibility as a client testing anonymously... no
But for members on the fence... you might spark interest.

The way I see it, random bought testing vs your own testing... it just shows validation to your claim I brewed and it came out such and such.
Just by testing yourself don't take away your credit for someone randomly testing/bloods.

Problem with the lab testing their own gear is people will say the gear came from the labs "special supply". It really needs to be something sent to a customer that the lab has no idea it's being tested. And that customer has to be solid in the community.

Sasquatch Labs just paid out $400.00 US for someone to post Uncapped bloods. Even at that amount they hit their 72page before someone finally posted their bloods.

 

[Steve84]

Problem with the lab testing their own gear is people will say the gear came from the labs "special supply". It really needs to be something sent to a customer that the lab has no idea it's being tested. And that customer has to be solid in the community.

Sasquatch Labs just paid out $400.00 US for someone to post Uncapped bloods. Even at that amount they hit their 72page before someone finally posted their bloods.

That's true..but like I said, it's what do you want out of it.
His own testing vs no testing? I'll take some testing.

And doesn't replace customer testing..just is something to help shore up business interest.